Sony Ericsson / Sony : Tips and tricks : T68, T39 vs. T65...
>
New Topic
>
Reply<
Esato Forum Index
>
Sony Ericsson / Sony >
Tips and tricks
> T68, T39 vs. T65...
Bookmark topic
I do like my T65. The only thing lacking for me is an Infrared slot. I am an avid PDA user as well (Sony CLie) so I could very well use my cell phone along with that. Not asking even for bluetooth but just an IR will do ! But one of the features I love about it is you can even customize the message alert of a particular person! plus the SMS counter of course-very useful .
--
Posted: 2002-09-06 14:30:00
Edit :
Quote
I do like my T65. The only thing lacking for me is an Infrared slot. I am an avid PDA user as well (Sony CLie) so I could very well use my cell phone along with that. Not asking even for bluetooth but just an IR will do ! But one of the features I love about it is you can even customize the message alert of a particular person! plus the SMS counter of course-very useful .
--
Posted: 2002-09-06 14:31:00
Edit :
Quote
The IR eye on my T39 is everything! I works fine for synchronizing my calendar and contacts from Microsoft Outlook on my laptop with the calendar and contacts on the T39. Using the latest software from SE, one can also upload background pictures to the T39 (I tried it and it works smoothly). The phone book and SMS manager allows you to send text messages directly from the computer and to edit your phone book (through the IR connction). You'd miss all these with the T65, wouldn't you?!
--
Posted: 2002-10-14 04:52:00
Edit :
Quote
i'm gonna have to disagree with masu on the fact that the T68i has a lot of useless features. there's maybe about 3 things that's useless on it (Draw pictures/notes/timer) but it's not like Sony-Ericsson spent millions of dollars and countless years designing them. The only reason why T68i is a teen phone (me being 17 years old and owning one) is the price. It's the second cheapest full color phone on the market (opposed to the new Sprint one, forgot the model). It's not like we have unlimited budget here. All phones have their uesless features and quirks, and I've owned about 10 different cell phones and strongly believe that the T68i hit pretty close to home (despite slowness through menus and internet connection).
--
Posted: 2002-10-14 05:25:00
Edit :
Quote
Same here. I love the classic Ericsson look, especially on my T39m. The color, the flip, and the cool antenna (yeah, mind you!) makes it a stylish executive phone. Features are still at par with today's standards (except for the color and the MMS).
T68i and later SE models are so 'kiddie-designed'. I do hope SE comes up with more 'mature'-looking models.
Quote:
On 2002-08-25 06:08, the jackal wrote:
WHOA! I have to speak out and defend our ranks (t39m user) t65 is a nice phone, also with t68i. but for me a phone wbout a flip is not a mobile phone. my t39 goes perfect with my suites, very professional, we have to remember the days when u see a phone w/ a flip, its an ericcson! if t68i has a "flip", i already bought one! and the p800 is quite bulky for my coat pocket/belt pocket-holster, so i will be force to hand carry it
This post was posted from a T39
--
Posted: 2002-10-14 19:29:00
Edit :
Quote
MMS is crap anyway: expensive and useless. You want to send pictures and videoclips? Buy yourself a good digital camera
--
Posted: 2002-10-15 04:52:00
Edit :
Quote
Yes, the T39 has everything I whant in a phone; BT, GPRS, Small size, good batterylife, Nice design a.s.o..........
I've had it for over a year now and I have no intention of changeing it anytime soon.....
If i feel the need for a colour display, I just pick up my Ipaq 3870. =)
--
Posted: 2002-10-15 19:17:00
Edit :
Quote
I have a t65 r600 and a T300.
The T65 is a decent phone, somewhat better then the R600, but i like the R600 design better. Both lacks to much, so i bought a T300 instead which i just love.
I have not sold my T65 and R600 yet, dont know why... but the T65 is a good working phone. Its can stand a drop in the ground without getting big scrathces in the front. R600 is more fragile. But the T65 is a better phone, heavier, but better battery times.Dont know if im gonna sell both or just one yet.
I mean, what do you get for 2, 5 month old phones today. 140€ and 130€
That is no p800.Maybe a new front to my T300
--
Posted: 2002-10-15 21:35:00
Edit :
Quote
Any of you T65 owners, that have problems with the sim card location? My phone turns off when i run or something, the text 'Insert Sim' shows then...
So, anyone have any tips how i can get this problem fixed?
And is it some hidden menu's in T65?
Thanks mates
--
Posted: 2002-10-17 00:53:00
Edit :
Quote
thre is a great debate over the 65 or 68 which a lot of people have bounced off each other, yes i WANTED a 65 as it was A PHONE, but it has been superceded inthe stores in my area so i got a 68 as it was its replacement, yeah its a gimmik, not as much as the 68i ! but the reason i went for it was the battery life in the unit for talk time especially ......
what an awful lot of you have overlooked is the loverly t66 which i also have, a very small and compact unit. NOT A BRICK to compair with its two "rivals" the 65 and 68(i)
the moral of the story is its a question of taste, what one person likes the other may not.... simple and this group has a selection of 65 lovers and 68 lovers i dont like cod liver oil but i dont go on about it as a thread !
--
Posted: 2002-10-17 21:18:00
Edit :
Quote
New Topic
Reply
