News Forum Phone database

> New Topic
> Topic Locked
Esato Forum Index > General discussions > Non mobile discussion > U.S. planning for possible attack on Iran Bookmark topic

Quote:
On 2006-04-06 01:47:37, scotsboyuk wrote:
Well you will insist on posting tosh.


Yeh Tosh according to you...the majority of members actually like and supports what i do....not surprised by that remark after all your someone who took vanquish under his wings.

Quote:
On 2006-04-06 01:47:37, scotsboyuk wrote:
I'm sorry to have to deflate your ego, which from past experience seems to crave attention, but you are not something that attracts me to Esato, quite the opposite in fact.

I realise that you don't take much of an interest in anything that doesn't involve armchair protesting about topics you have little knowledge of, but I do actually post in mobile related topics, which you can see if you care to look.


I believe me i don't care in the slightest what a you think of me....I don't need attention from the likes of your anyway,..your the one who comes jumping into my threads with your rubbish that you post...looks like you do come here for me...come on baby i need your attention!

I like your little assesment of me their...rather interesting i'd say....protest and me?...never....so Just bitch away all you like dear boy!

So you do post in mobile related topics then?..oh ok...because im always here and i don't see much of you,..unless its in my non-mobile threads that is.

Quote:
On 2006-04-06 01:47:37, scotsboyuk wrote:
I see that you are still unable to grasp the written word properly. Read my post again and you will see that I didn't say Spanish was more widely spoken than English in the U.S.


are you sure your not a girl pretending to be a guy?

Quote:
On 2006-04-06 01:47:37, scotsboyuk wrote:
Countries have fought one another for as long as countries have existed, the modern world is no different in that respect. To think that has changed somehow in the past century or so is basically incorrect. We are no more advanced in terms of eradicating war and conflict now than we were in the Middle Ages. If anything wars have become more destructive and more people die in them.


And now america has the monopoly on wars either by being directly involved in them by aiding/funding or supporting them...so things have changed.


Quote:
On 2006-04-06 01:47:37, scotsboyuk wrote:
Well it is difficult not to disagree with the complete and utter drivel that is spouted at every turn with seeming abandon for facts and reason.

Of course for all your protestation you still don't provide any substantiating evidence.


Its funny how your the only one that thinks its drivel...everyone else seems to agree with me.....If anything its you and the rubbish that you spout everytime i post.,,and the end of the day i give my opinions,its tough if you don't like it....but thats just the way it is.

i'll provide evidence when i feel necessary to do so,otherwise you will just have to accept what i post.


Quote:
On 2006-04-06 01:47:37, scotsboyuk wrote:
This must be a question you either don't like or don't have an answer for since you seem to be avoiding giving a straight answer.


Like i said i'll answer what i need to or what i feel like answering...since you don't like what i post anyway so whats the point?

Quote:
On 2006-04-06 01:47:37, scotsboyuk wrote:
I'm in fine form thank you very much. I think it has something to do with the laughable toddle that seems to appear every time you are let near a keyboard.



You know your always welcome...after all we do go back a long way.

Im glad i make you laugh,because i also laugh at the crap you post in my threads.
--
Posted: 2006-04-06 02:16:36
Edit : Quote


Look I can be a real bitch when people disagree with me. I killed my own "can camera phones replace low-end digital cameras" thread by letting myself argue with Dazbradbury about trivial shit. People stopped posting to what would have otherwise been a good thread.

So the lesson I learnt was to let go of issues when the other person simply won't hear my point, or just has a major difference of opinion. Sometimes I notice in the arguments between axxxr and scots that they aren't necessarily at odds philosophically but are reacting to eachother because they are so different. Axxr makes blanket statements (example "Americans are evil") which if he really thinks about it he knows is not true. But Scots can't stand this "over-generalisation" and argues point for point. This makes Axxr think that Scots is nit picking. Then it just blows out from there

--
Posted: 2006-04-06 02:24:57
Edit : Quote


yeh but America is Evil ..

so is Australia come to think of it...after what you lot did to the poor aboriginis!
--
Posted: 2006-04-06 02:29:06
Edit : Quote


@axxxr - What is this issue about Australia's 'aborigins' mate How are they connected to the 'aborido's' . . . thanks!
--
Posted: 2006-04-06 02:39:54
Edit : Quote


sorry JN mate you will have to get max_wedge to answer that one.

--
Posted: 2006-04-06 02:41:31
Edit : Quote


Well were do I start? We virtually wiped out mainland aboriginal people (the native australians here before white man settled the country), and actually did completely decimate the Aborigines of Tasmania (the large island just off the bottom of Australian mainland). The aborigines of Tasmania were actually significantly different (physically and culturally) to the mainland guys, and not a single one exists to this day. A whole culture and people completely gone. Genocide in other words. It's an embarrasing and disgusting fact of Australian white history.

Even more recently (up to the 1970's), many aborginal tribes still living their natural lifestyle were rounded up and wiped out to the man, woman and child.

Those aborigines employed on white settlements or living on missions had their children stolen from them so they could be given to "proper" homes (which of course happened to be white people) to be raised in western traditions and assimilated into the white population. This was done as part of an actual policy of assimilation, designed to eliminate the aboriginal culture (and also eliminate any aboriginal people failing to play the white man's game). This policy was even called "the white Australia policy".

Some people in Australia still believe in assimilation, however only a small proportion thankfully.

Our current Prime-Minister, when Aboriginal people formally asked for an apology from the government for the stolen generation (as the stolen children have come to be called) and other injustices, outright refused (due to fear of increased liability in class actions by the stolen generation).

I am utterly ashamed.
--
Posted: 2006-04-06 03:26:30
Edit : Quote


Quote:
On 2006-04-06 02:16:36, axxxr wrote:

Yeh Tosh according to you...


... and anyone else who is half sane.

Quote:
the majority of members actually like and supports what i do....


I see the ego is once more coming to the fore. One imagines, like anything else you find inconvenient to your world view, that you simply ignore those who find your posts repetitive and/or total tripe.

Quote:
... not surprised by that remark after all your someone who took vanquish under his wings.


If by 'took under your wings' you mean 'didn't get into a schoolyard name calling match with vanquish' then yes I suppose I did.

However, you forgot to mention that the Masons were prompting me to do so at the behest of the CIA to support their secret reptilian masters from another dimension in their efforts to dominate Middle Eastern oil and keep Bush in power so as to help the Illuminati bring the New World Order a step closer.

Quote:
I believe me i don't care in the slightest what a you think of me....


Well at least you believe what you say!

Quote:
I don't need attention from the likes of your anyway,..


Ah yes the likes of me, as in people who do not subscripe to wild unsubstantiated generalisations and who ask you to provide evidence of your views.

Quote:
... your the one who comes jumping into my threads with your rubbish that you post...looks like you do come here for me...come on baby i need your attention!

I like your little assesment of me their...rather interesting i'd say....protest and me?...never....so Just bitch away all you like dear boy!


One wouldn't jump into a barrel full of excrement and in a similar manner I don't jump into your threads. Rather I look to challenge you on the ludicrous nature of your posts, which offend other members of Esato, and which have led to complaints about them. Apparently you find the concept of someone challenging your views and asking you to support them to be something to be avoided.

As difficult as it might be for you to believe I actually don't find your nonsense terribly interesting (one can substitute 'interesting' for most other positive adjectives here). Despite that I think it is important that someone points out the flaws (not to mention the rediculous nature) of your views.

Quote:
So you do post in mobile related topics then?..oh ok...because im always here and i don't see much of you,..unless its in my non-mobile threads that is.


I'm not surprised you don't notice, it must be time consuming offending other members of Esato or working yet another group into your conspiracy theories or thinking up more wild generalisations.

Quote:
are you sure your not a girl pretending to be a guy?


Clearly realising that you made a mistake here you seem to have resorted to going off at a tangent. I can't say I'm surprised, you show little indication of being able to hold to rational thought in other posts you have made.

Quote:
And now america has the monopoly on wars either by being directly involved in them by aiding/funding or supporting them...so things have changed.


I'm going to float a new concept for you here, providing substantiating evidence. Can you please provide us with evidence to show that every war in recent history has been started by or supported by America thus giving them a monopoly on war?

Quote:
Its funny how your the only one that thinks its drivel...everyone else seems to agree with me.....If anything its you and the rubbish that you spout everytime i post.,,and the end of the day i give my opinions,its tough if you don't like it....but thats just the way it is.


Your detachment from reality seems to be increasing. I know of several people who think your posts are total nonsense and, in some cases, offensive too. I also know of people who find your posts repetitive or boring. It would seem that you don't handle criticism very well and thus you have simply chosen to ignore it and pretend that it doesn't exist. I dare say the limit of universal agreement with your points stops at your frontdoor.

Quote:
i'll provide evidence when i feel necessary to do so,otherwise you will just have to accept what i post.


Spoken like a true autocrat. Why shouldn't you post evidence of your views? If they are true as you claim then there should be evidence. I don't have to accept a single word you post and I would encourage others do the same if they aren't already.

With that in mind let's translate your last statement there into straight forward English:

"I shall provide evidence when I actually have some because my posts usually contain wild generalisations I have just thought up and therefore don't have supporting evidence. Please don't ask me awkward questions that will expose my views for the used toilet paper they are."

Quote:
Like i said i'll answer what i need to or what i feel like answering...since you don't like what i post anyway so whats the point?


Translation:

"Yes you are correct this is a question I don't like and do not wish to answer so I shall just make a blanket statement saying that I don't need to. Since you point out the flaws in my statements what would be the point in me answering since more flaws would likely be pointed out?"

Quote:
You know your always welcome...after all we do go back a long way.

Im glad i make you laugh,because i also laugh at the crap you post in my threads.



From the looks of the innane mince you post I think we should be grateful that you are able to laugh at all.


_________________
"I may be drunk my dear woman, but in the morning I will be sober, and you will still be ugly." WSC

[ This Message was edited by: scotsboyuk on 2006-04-06 03:11 ]
--
Posted: 2006-04-06 03:50:05
Edit : Quote


it's in my opinion that the US shouldn't be attacking Iran.
IMO it should work both ways.
If Iran went into the US claiming that they had no right to have weapons because they feel threatened how would the world react. I'm sure not similarly.

Then there are those who say, "they are backwards".

There was a time when England and the US itself was a country of torture, pain, but also progression.

Countries need to be given the chance to adapt at their own pace, and only when the people of that country ask for help, should another country interfere.
--
Posted: 2006-04-06 04:04:04
Edit : Quote


@amnesia

The NPT says that certain countries can have nuclear weapons and others can't. Iran has signed that treaty and is bound by it. I think the concern comes from the fact that Iran kept its nuclear programme secret for so long.
--
Posted: 2006-04-06 04:13:18
Edit : Quote


Quote:
On 2006-04-06 04:04:04, amnesia wrote:
it's in my opinion that the US shouldn't be attacking Iran.
IMO it should work both ways.
If Iran went into the US claiming that they had no right to have weapons because they feel threatened how would the world react. I'm sure not similarly.

Then there are those who say, "they are backwards".

There was a time when England and the US itself was a country of torture, pain, but also progression.

Countries need to be given the chance to adapt at their own pace, and only when the people of that country ask for help, should another country interfere.



oh come on, do you seriously think it's all about the "manifest destiny" crap that the bush administration trying to push forth? they could care less about the state of the people in Iran.

it's all about the grease, baby, all about the grease.
--
Posted: 2006-04-06 04:13:55
Edit : Quote

---

New Topic   Topic Locked

Forum Index