>
New Topic
>
Reply<
Esato Forum Index
>
Sony Ericsson / Sony >
General
> se k700 vs nokia 6600
Bookmark topic
@cheesewhiz - How can I just forget about those advantages dude
Overall, the
K700i still wins the 'comparison' between the two pal . . . Maybe the Nokia 6230 can outbest the K7 here . . .
--
Posted: 2005-03-05 02:45:10
Edit :
Quote
But you gotta put up with the lousy screen. Get the k700 mate:-)
This message was posted from a K700i
--
Posted: 2005-03-05 04:16:36
Edit :
Quote
Yup! It's the K7 who wins here !
--
Posted: 2005-03-05 04:21:49
Edit :
Quote
It really depends on what one wants in a phone. But there are two factors that are a bit hard to explain in writing: Overall user experience and, consequently, brand loyalty. These could only be obtained by actually using a phone. Even though 6600 & 6230 look better on paper, the K700i is more pleasing to use than both. I've used all of them.
There you go, @Glenny, our objective specs descriptions, as well as our subjective impressions.
Btw, I'm happy with the K700i's MP3 capabilities, despite the capacity limitation.
--
Posted: 2005-03-05 05:20:54
Edit :
Quote
Right on chili, I couldn't have said it any better! In the end it still boils down to which really satisfies your individual needs, and you will never really know it until you tried it yourself.
--
Posted: 2005-03-05 07:37:08
Edit :
Quote
to glenn and blackspot :
K700 cannot read .aac files directly. You have to use .mp4 (or .m4a) kind of files. You can use iTunes from Apple to convert mp3 or audio files to .m4a files and listen with k700.
.mp4 and .m4a files contain .aac code for audio. aac code has better quality than mp3 code for the same bit rate. So if you satisfied with 128kbps bit rate mp3 files, you can get the same quality with aac code in 64 kbps bit rate. Smaller bit rate means smaller file size so you can squeeze more songs to k700 limited memory without sacrificing the sound quality than if you do it with mp3 code.
To me, for daily use, aac code in 64 kbps bit rate is good enough to company you while on the road to hear some songs with stereo quality. 5 mb song file in 128 kbps can become 3 or 4 mb in 64 kbps.
--
Posted: 2005-03-05 07:52:30
Edit :
Quote
Quote:
On 2005-03-05 02:40:03, whizkidd wrote:
Jojo matey, you forgot about the multiple web browsing thingy and also the fact that is is very much cheaper than the K700! I'm not at all rich you know! I love that multiple browsers thing on the 6600. Gr8 feature for wappers!
This message was posted from a T230
How much do the 2 phones cost at your place mate coz in delhi 6600 is just 500Rs cheaper than the k7...i'm talking about brand new boxed pieces that is. Also referring to your web browsing impressions of the 6600 let me mention that its slower gprs class6 while k7 is class10
--
Posted: 2005-03-05 07:54:00
Edit :
Quote
Does the 6600 do stereo quality sound??
--
Posted: 2005-03-05 08:06:18
Edit :
Quote
Quote:
On 2005-03-05 08:06:18, mrao wrote:
Does the 6600 do stereo quality sound??
No it doesnt and actually it does a pathetic job of rendering even mono sound.
--
Posted: 2005-03-05 08:11:00
Edit :
Quote
Quote:
On 2005-03-05 07:52:30, sapibobo wrote:
to glenn and blackspot :
K700 cannot read .aac files directly. You have to use .mp4 (or .m4a) kind of files...
I don't know why you're telling me this
I specifically mentioned "mp4 support" didn't I?
--
Posted: 2005-03-05 08:13:01
Edit :
Quote
New Topic
Reply
