>
New Topic
>
Reply<
Esato Forum Index
>
Manufacturer Discussion >
Samsung
> Samsung Galaxy S5 Announced
Bookmark topic
It's the 808PV's gang
--
Posted: 2014-04-24 21:21:21
Edit :
Quote
Looks like the S5 can take awesome photos, great pic.
--
Posted: 2014-04-24 21:27:30
Edit :
Quote
Most phones can take great photos in the right hands.
--
Posted: 2014-04-24 21:56:39
Edit :
Quote
On 2014-04-24 21:56:39, Bonovox wrote:
Most phones can take great photos in the right hands.
True but I think Samsung have done a really good job with the S5, better than the S4 camera, bigger sensor.
I'm just surprised they didn't add a Dual LED flash or something and some of the new Touchwiz icons look a little bit like iOS 7 and also they have the fingerprint scanner so they do like to add some things from Apple
--
Posted: 2014-04-24 21:59:53
Edit :
Quote
You've taken some great pics Davidsic, you're doing that GS5 ISOCELL Camera a lot of justice, it seems like Samsung have done a fantastic job with their sensor, I hope at some point they make their own sensors for every one of their phones, they must become as vertically integrated as possible.
--
Posted: 2014-04-24 22:03:30
Edit :
Quote
Thanks for the comments, if you watch the picture closely it's not perfect, it's a hdr one and there's a little shift
--
Posted: 2014-04-24 22:14:15
Edit :
Quote
Nice countryside,I've been to Belgium I liked it
Anyway why do people do this with a brand new device?? They must have more money than sense
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KP2S5yDZ3cY#t=26[ This Message was edited by: Bonovox on 2014-04-24 21:41 ]
--
Posted: 2014-04-24 22:40:15
Edit :
Quote
Well, well, well. I have been compllaining about Samsung's call quality and at some point I started to feel odd because people who have them seem to think otherwise. Phonearena just confirmed that I was right on their S5 review. That is exactly how I found the S4 to be in the call quality stakes, it sounded muffled. It seems Samsung can't get that right.
I have been using phones since the days of Ericsson and Nokia and I am in a pretty good position to know what good call quality is. Fortunately for me Blackberry still know that a phone has to be a phone first and then a smart device. I know Nokia still holds to the same high standards cause my brother's Lumia 925 is excellent in that area.
--
Posted: 2014-04-27 07:50:28
Edit :
Quote
I'm always fussy with call quality but my Note 3 is a lot better at signal than the S4 was. Call clarity is loud and crisp though. It's funny how Nokia used to be great for signal but for some odd reason their Lumia phones often have poor reception. Pocketnow website also complained about S4 and S5 call quality but I found them to be fine. Sometimes manufacturers need to just get the basics right.
--
Posted: 2014-04-27 09:36:00
Edit :
Quote
I agree, Bono, basics should be in place first. With Nokia you can be sure you get excellent call quality 90 percent of the time, obviously, the low end phones aren't given too much thought but they are more consistent in paying special attention to the call quality of their phones.
As for the reception of their phones, I tend to agree with you that things have changed drastically. I do think it has to do with phones being many things at once. Think of AV receiver versus stereo amplifiers, the stereo amps will almost always sound far better than receivers when it comes to music reproduction.
I am not hating on Samsung but my experiences with them have been rather poor, from signal reception to call quality. I am never, and I do mean never, buying another Samsung phone. I am probably going to go the Sony route should I decide to give Android another chance. Heck, I may even give Jolla a chance... if I can find their phones anywhere.
--
Posted: 2014-04-27 10:14:40
Edit :
Quote
New Topic
Reply
