News Forum Phone database

> New Topic
> Reply
< Esato Forum Index > Sony Ericsson / Sony > Software, Firmware and Drivers > Super camera driver for k750/w800/w810 Bookmark topic

@679
www.sendspace.com/file/vmri59 you can pay attention not only on quality but on file size also (remember: 21.91 normal and fine mode equals)

by the way, to be exact - we have here small misunderstanding with two various things. our phones don't have adaptive compression but variable quantization (which works sometimes better, sometimes worst). it was always present in our phones

--
Posted: 2007-06-18 12:23:51
Edit : Quote




Yep! It works. Thx! Pictures size is 530-602KB against 395-412 KB for the same text image. But seems u r right, after comparison of the same part of snaps i cant be sure which one is better or more sharp...
Ah yes, i will use text recognition program to be sure which snap provide better percentage text recognition...
--
Posted: 2007-06-18 13:24:40
Edit : Quote




Well, I'm a bit OT, but common, if you can't differences between f360 modena and f430... In that picture, it was classic f360 Muhehehéé
--
Posted: 2007-06-18 13:26:51
Edit : Quote


679
Most artefacts on contrast edges are given by camera sensor not the JPEG.
You need to compare a smooth areas which always has noise. When the quality is low you'll get a "porridge" of big smooth points and you'll lose all small soft details in this areas.
JPEG works like MP3: higher compression - more soft sounds you'll lose.
--
Posted: 2007-06-18 13:51:00
Edit : Quote


the best way to reproduce crash is to get very bright (+2.0EV) picture but with some visible details (blank white screen can't cause crash). even latest SPU's compression settings at 90% can't hold on this type of image content

--
Posted: 2007-06-18 14:26:04
Edit : Quote




Yes, i've got near the same level of text recognition in OCR (Abby Fine Reader 7.0) for both 412k and 568k pictures size. And mb this comparison is like to compare Stradivary violine sound and good ordinary one violine. Only musicians can hear the difference. And may be me - under the very big zoom .
And BTW - once i've went out from the camera mode - mb of picture size was above buffer size. Is it useless to correct buffer size to 616K (966640 - in cam_ss_jpeg_buf_size_8=927C0)?
--
Posted: 2007-06-18 14:30:25
Edit : Quote


@ raiderski @all

hey buddy i have a real problem with my k750i camera.....last week my phone got dead as i tried to flash the erom and eventually got it repaired at a local shop but now when i change my camera driver (any modded) there seems to be no difference in the pictures all appear to be having more contrast and very low brightness......dark areas appear to be little noisy.....please help me out i dont understand what had happened!!!
--
Posted: 2007-06-18 14:53:14
Edit : Quote


w810i vs Nokia 5300
I use sarmad 5.7, macro 1.1:infinity, sharpness "5"
w810i

5300

w810i

5300

The pics of nokia are very sharp but not real colour. Sarmad 5.7 are good colour but not so sharp :| .

[ This Message was edited by: Aur3LiaN on 2007-06-18 14:51 ]

[ This Message was edited by: Aur3LiaN on 2007-06-18 15:00 ]
--
Posted: 2007-06-18 15:32:49
Edit : Quote


@Aur3LiaN

i think the w810 is more rich in details.
maybe the 5300 look sharper but its lacks of detail in pix.
i'll post back ur image taken with w810i and ive make a round mark on it and just compare it with the nokia pix.



cheerz..
--
Posted: 2007-06-18 16:58:22
Edit : Quote




Ooops. My mistake. Guess I missed it in a hurry. Both very hot cars and look very alike but IMHO the F430 is hotter.
--
Posted: 2007-06-18 19:29:28
Edit : Quote

---

New Topic   Reply

Forum Index