News Forum Phone database

> New Topic
> Topic Locked
Esato Forum Index > Sony Ericsson / Sony > Software, Firmware and Drivers > Hybrid Camera Driver for W800i/K750 Bookmark topic

So which driver is the best driver at the moment for best pictures,

the 2.4 hybrid driver or the R1A044 driver?


--
Posted: 2006-07-22 21:20:25
Edit : Quote


Quote:
On 2006-07-14 20:43:51, obentou wrote:
Is there a point in taking pictures in night mode when there is sufficient lighting? Or when do you use "night mode" even though it isn't perfectly dark?


this i want to know too, if u take pictures with night mode on, even in day light, will the pictures be better than taking the picture without night mode on?
--
Posted: 2006-07-22 21:24:35
Edit : Quote


Yes.. it's less grainy!
--
Posted: 2006-07-22 21:31:07
Edit : Quote


See!

--
Posted: 2006-07-22 21:55:40
Edit : Quote


@chakme : dear friend, if you read above, i say i use this camdriver with 92% coz' more compression let Crash cell, for information, THIS IS ORIGINAL SonyEricsson firmware of the first k750s ( if my memory is good : with good photos).
Now for Stability, many people with R1a088 have crash with this camdriver, so play with Compression setting the Original Compression in Fine mode is 90% ( SonyEricsson factory Parameters ).

Cerede2000 goes to 97% but because instability, he's comes back to 95%. ( I repeat, for my phone 93% is incompatible)

The only line added is version for compatibility with news firms
(seq_get_prop_0 = $s1 04 $s0 05;)

@DeXx.

[ This Message was edited by: dekson on 2006-07-22 21:46 ]
--
Posted: 2006-07-22 21:56:59
Edit : Quote


Well although the pictures are less grainy when you take pictures, I usually use the camera to take pictures with people and not of landscapes. People cannot wait 10 seconds for me to wait for the lens to focus in night mode and etc. Besides, the pictures usually overexpose the human skin when taken up close in night mode. In my opinion, the cam driver has to be good in normal mode and not only in night mode; that way there's a balance between practicality and performance in the driver.

Edit: I'll try this R1A004 driver tonight over the 2.4 Hybrid, and see how it goes. Will let you guys know sometime soon.


[ This Message was edited by: obentou on 2006-07-22 21:11 ]
--
Posted: 2006-07-22 22:08:28
Edit : Quote


so far, i really like this R1A044 driver...
it's working very well for me, and pictures are very clear.
at least they seem a lot clearer than before.
i think i'll stick with this for a little while.
--
Posted: 2006-07-22 23:04:46
Edit : Quote




Are you compare with the 2.4 version?

[ This Message was edited by: cerede2000 on 2006-07-22 23:34 ]
--
Posted: 2006-07-22 23:24:44
Edit : Quote


So.. now.. which is the better driver? In my k750, I have the 2.1 hybrid, because 2.4 overexposures a lot, but I'm seeying that the R1A044 is quite good.
So.. which is the better?

Regards
--
Posted: 2006-07-23 00:38:38
Edit : Quote


@schumy : only you can decide.

@All : for prove the authenticity of the camdriver,mimic take a snapshot with his phone, look the date and the property of photo it's his camdriver and no fake !

http://img135.imageshack.us/img135/5108/dsc00256gd5.jpg

Thaks a lot Mimic

Best regards.

@DeXx.

[ This Message was edited by: dekson on 2006-07-23 00:05 ]
--
Posted: 2006-07-23 00:59:26
Edit : Quote

---

New Topic   Topic Locked

Forum Index