Sony Ericsson / Sony : Software, Firmware and Drivers : Raider camera driver for C901 [current is v6.3.2]
>
New Topic
>
Reply<
Esato Forum Index
>
Sony Ericsson / Sony >
Software, Firmware and Drivers
> Raider camera driver for C901 [current is v6.3.2]
Bookmark topic
I wonder if we can have AEB assistant like on the K800i driver
On paper (in theory) C901 can do this without any tricks, with one click only. In practice I don't know yet
How's Raider v6.3 version doing?
Slow but not bad.
--
Posted: 2010-04-08 16:05:13
Edit :
Quote
I saw that Anouk's driver for c902 can produce file size up to 7mb, isn't it possible for c901 to reach something like that?
--
Posted: 2010-04-08 18:27:00
Edit :
Quote
Why would you want that? The quality wont get any better, it will just take up more room meaning you can take less photos
--
Posted: 2010-04-08 18:47:46
Edit :
Quote
I know it makes no sense at all but i like it. Something around 5mb per pic would be fine. Then I'd have space for around 1000 more pics and 400 on my spare card.
--
Posted: 2010-04-08 18:55:00
Edit :
Quote
I dont understand EV (exposure compensation) how does this make the picture brighter? its not ISO (sensitivity of sensor to light) and its not shutter speed (length of time sensor exposed to light)
--
Posted: 2010-04-08 19:01:16
Edit :
Quote
Wikipedia will tell you about
Exposure value 
--
Posted: 2010-04-08 19:28:10
Edit :
Quote
Thanks
"increase exposure, by using either a longer exposure time or a smaller f-number." the f-number cannot be changed on camera-phones so I guess changing the EV value either changed the shutter speed or ISO
--
Posted: 2010-04-08 19:37:33
Edit :
Quote
I saw that Anouk's driver for c902 can produce file size up to 7mb, isn't it possible for c901 to reach something like that?
Try to find differences between 2MB and 4MB pics
We don't need superfine compression because we are not in the same league of quality as digital cameras. If quality is degraded by compression then compression must be low, very low or superfine with 0% data loss. We don't have enough quality from sensor to use ~0% data loss during compression. It will eat your memcard without any benefits. It's not my priority to implement superfine compression, maybe someday.
--
Posted: 2010-04-08 20:51:48
Edit :
Quote
I know it's completly useless but I like it.
--
Posted: 2010-04-08 20:59:47
Edit :
Quote
We don't have autofocus in video mode, right?
--
Posted: 2010-04-08 21:57:27
Edit :
Quote
New Topic
Reply
