News Forum Phone database

> New Topic
> Topic Locked
Esato Forum Index > Sony Ericsson / Sony > Software, Firmware and Drivers > Hybrid Camera Driver for W800i/K750 Bookmark topic

Mark_Q can you explain what is with this 2 pictures?...because i don't understand witch one is 7.8 and witch one is 30.1
--
Posted: 2006-11-04 21:56:37
Edit : Quote


ToryXX,

I opened both samples in PhotoShop Elements and used as experiment (nothing I usually do otherwise) Auto Color Correction Tool, then saved the corrected version as copy and overlaid it with the original after I moved the copy to right and down for comparison.

Version 7.8 above, version 30.1 below. Just an effort to easier detect the overall color cast on both. Did I succeed?

EDIT:

These pairs are hardly the final absolute truth, but done by same software detecting color cast, so...

[ This Message was edited by: Mark_Q on 2006-11-04 21:10 ]
--
Posted: 2006-11-04 22:07:22
Edit : Quote


thank you,

somebody can give me the exactly values of macro in a cam driver???.....where i find the macro values in a driver cam?...if somebody can help me pls


Quote:
On 2006-11-04 22:07:22, Mark_Q wrote:
ToryXX,

I opened both samples in PhotoShop Elements and used as experiment (nothing I usually do otherwise) Auto Color Correction Tool, then saved the corrected version as copy and overlaid it with the original after I moved the copy to right and down for comparison.

Version 7.8 above, version 30.1 below. Just an effort to easier detect the overall color cast on both. Did I succeed?

EDIT:

These pairs are hardly the final absolute truth, but done by same software detecting color cast, so...

[ This Message was edited by: Mark_Q on 2006-11-04 21:10 ]

--
Posted: 2006-11-04 22:17:51
Edit : Quote




[ This Message was edited by: imsje on 2006-11-04 23:05 ]
--
Posted: 2006-11-04 22:56:58
Edit : Quote


Quote:
On 2006-11-04 22:07:22, Mark_Q wrote:
ToryXX,

I opened both samples in PhotoShop Elements and used as experiment (nothing I usually do otherwise) Auto Color Correction Tool, then saved the corrected version as copy and overlaid it with the original after I moved the copy to right and down for comparison.

Version 7.8 above, version 30.1 below. Just an effort to easier detect the overall color cast on both. Did I succeed?

EDIT:

These pairs are hardly the final absolute truth, but done by same software detecting color cast, so...

[ This Message was edited by: Mark_Q on 2006-11-04 21:10 ]



Mark_q
What we need? Natural color as we see or how Auto Color Correction Tool see?

As I can see, 30.1 is closer to Auto Color Correction Tool and 7.8 is closer to what we see. It is same with my test at home.

Torry_xx , what you think?

[ This Message was edited by: imsje on 2006-11-04 22:07 ]
--
Posted: 2006-11-04 23:02:04
Edit : Quote


to think what? just i want to know and to see witch values make macro on cam driver...can you help me please?:) imsje

Quote:
On 2006-11-04 23:02:04, imsje wrote:
Quote:
On 2006-11-04 22:07:22, Mark_Q wrote:
ToryXX,

I opened both samples in PhotoShop Elements and used as experiment (nothing I usually do otherwise) Auto Color Correction Tool, then saved the corrected version as copy and overlaid it with the original after I moved the copy to right and down for comparison.

Version 7.8 above, version 30.1 below. Just an effort to easier detect the overall color cast on both. Did I succeed?

EDIT:

These pairs are hardly the final absolute truth, but done by same software detecting color cast, so...

[ This Message was edited by: Mark_Q on 2006-11-04 21:10 ]



Mark_q
What we need? Natural color as we see or how Auto Color Correction Tool see?

As I can see, 30.1 is closer to Auto Color Correction Tool and 7.8 is closer to what we see. It is same with my test at home.

Torry_xx , what you think?

[ This Message was edited by: imsje on 2006-11-04 22:07 ]


[ This Message was edited by: ToryXX on 2006-11-04 22:33 ]
--
Posted: 2006-11-04 23:32:24
Edit : Quote


more 30.1
http://img234.imageshack.us/img234/9875/dsc00984nc4.jpg

http://img143.imageshack.us/img143/2381/dsc00990ma8.jpg

Macro

http://img443.imageshack.us/img443/8335/dsc00991wf1.jpg

http://img225.imageshack.us/img225/4271/dsc00992zm4.jpg
--
Posted: 2006-11-04 23:41:52
Edit : Quote


i don t know why the macro on the 30.1 ,7.7 edited or 7.7final...7.30....is not so good like in the old cam drivers....for example 3.1 by erzan and so on...why is like this???....i must make a shot in macro so many times untill i take a good one....before didn't was this problem!
--
Posted: 2006-11-04 23:57:58
Edit : Quote


Hallo,

Iam using 7.7 final + edited. A focused on true colors 30.1 versus this 7.7.
I changed in 7.7 final + edited from from 30.1 as written below. And result?
With that modification you can achieve more true colors. First picture is original, second is edited by me. The wall is white, no yeallowisch






Quote:
On 2006-11-04 19:46:32, imsje wrote:
Quote:
On 2006-11-04 19:11:39, diego23 wrote:



7.8 is little bit sharper.

I think color is diff. because of this.

30.1
seq_set_prop_0=$s0 %0 $-0 0a 06 02 00 01 $w0 06 #CMD_END;

seq_get_prop_0 = $s1 1e $s0 01;

7.8
seq_set_prop_0=$s0 %0 $-0 0A 06 02 00 01 $w0 06 #CMD_END;

seq_get_prop_0 = $s1 07 $s0 07;


which one is more natural. which light you used?



[ This Message was edited by: RENOSJ on 2006-11-04 23:05 ]
--
Posted: 2006-11-05 00:02:45
Edit : Quote


best macros until now 7.12
--
Posted: 2006-11-05 00:03:09
Edit : Quote

---

New Topic   Topic Locked

Forum Index