Esato Mobile
Sony Ericsson / Sony : Android : Sony Xperia T & TX thread
> New Topic
> Reply
< Esato Forum Index > Sony Ericsson / Sony > Android > Sony Xperia T & TX thread Bookmark topic
Page <  123 ... 434445 ... 197198199>

mediar Posts: > 500

I have a question - what's the difference between W910's ( for example ) and new Xperia's screens? When I compare them both, the first thing to notice is that my W910's screen has much deeper and vivid colors ( the black color looks exactly like SAmoled one, while my Xperia Pro's black is more like a mix between dark grey and dark blue ). The second thing - viewing angles. The colors of the W910 stay absolutely the same, no matter how you look at the screen. While the Pro distorts the color even at slight move. Why?
--
Posted: 2012-09-28 22:04:00
Edit : Quote

king-james Posts: > 500

thejosetree thanks for the pics! T looking horrible... I really can't believe it, but I have read also some reviews about the bad screen of the T. Bad viewing angles and contrast. Exactly what you show us here...
--
Posted: 2012-09-28 23:32:09
Edit : Quote

Ricky D Posts: > 500

I'll get a couple comparison shots of my Arc, TX, C905 &whatever else I can find older and newer. I got to go out right now though, be back in a few hours.


Back:
Maybe this isn't a great test but here's My new TX next to Arc, full brightness from 4 different gradients. It's quite clear to see TX's screen is immense compared to Arc's in viewing angles, even in my amateurish shots.

In practice, the screen is fantastic. It is the best screen I've had personally to use, but then again I've been on Sony's for a long time. It's clear, bright enough, colours are vibrant and the colours don't stay 100% true at tight angles, lights get lighter and darks get darker, but the base of the colour remains. No colour inversion that you get on Arc. Black text on white background looks perfect from the tightest of angles (and so does white on black). Maybe I'll do an almost 90 degree shot of text on the screen later.


[ This Message was edited by: Ricky D on 2012-09-29 08:22 ]

--
Posted: 2012-09-29 01:42:37
Edit : Quote

mediar Posts: > 500

Make a comparison C905 vs Arc and C905 vs TX.
--
Posted: 2012-09-29 10:00:40
Edit : Quote

xenia Posts: 363

Hmm... feel the difference. Different screens detected(c)
--
Posted: 2012-09-29 10:12:05
Edit : Quote

Ricky D Posts: > 500

OK, let me juice up the C905, it's been in the drawer since I got an Aino.


...a bit later...

Left to right:
ARC X10 TX C905




C905 really bummed out in this.
X10 has a really weird blue tint (maybe it's purple I'm a bit colour deficient).
Arc isn't fantastic here.
TX is the best in the group.

Of course the photos here don't show the truth. In reality the differences are obvious and TX simply looks head and shoulders above the rest. At acute angles. It is the only one in which the blue of the sky is still identifiable as blue at a tight angle, the others either white it out or invert the colour.
[ This Message was edited by: Ricky D on 2012-09-29 10:15 ]

--
Posted: 2012-09-29 10:13:41
Edit : Quote

thejosetree Posts: 59


On 2012-09-29 01:42:37, Ricky D wrote:
I'll get a couple comparison shots of my Arc, TX, C905 &whatever else I can find older and newer. I got to go out right now though, be back in a few hours.


Back:
Maybe this isn't a great test but here's My new TX next to Arc, full brightness from 4 different gradients. It's quite clear to see TX's screen is immense compared to Arc's in viewing angles, even in my amateurish shots.

In practice, the screen is fantastic. It is the best screen I've had personally to use, but then again I've been on Sony's for a long time. It's clear, bright enough, colours are vibrant and the colours don't stay 100% true at tight angles, lights get lighter and darks get darker, but the base of the colour remains. No colour inversion that you get on Arc. Black text on white background looks perfect from the tightest of angles (and so does white on black). Maybe I'll do an almost 90 degree shot of text on the screen later.


[ This Message was edited by: Ricky D on 2012-09-29 08:22 ]



The TX looks awesome, may have a better screen than Xperia T. It would be a shame.
--
Posted: 2012-09-29 11:13:42
Edit : Quote

worf1000 Posts: 265


On 2012-09-29 11:13:42, thejosetree wrote:

On 2012-09-29 01:42:37, Ricky D wrote:
I'll get a couple comparison shots of my Arc, TX, C905 &whatever else I can find older and newer. I got to go out right now though, be back in a few hours.


Back:
Maybe this isn't a great test but here's My new TX next to Arc, full brightness from 4 different gradients. It's quite clear to see TX's screen is immense compared to Arc's in viewing angles, even in my amateurish shots.

In practice, the screen is fantastic. It is the best screen I've had personally to use, but then again I've been on Sony's for a long time. It's clear, bright enough, colours are vibrant and the colours don't stay 100% true at tight angles, lights get lighter and darks get darker, but the base of the colour remains. No colour inversion that you get on Arc. Black text on white background looks perfect from the tightest of angles (and so does white on black). Maybe I'll do an almost 90 degree shot of text on the screen later.


[ This Message was edited by: Ricky D on 2012-09-29 08:22 ]



The TX looks awesome, may have a better screen than Xperia T. It would be a shame.


The Screen of the T and TX are the same i have the T and it looks beautiful and in my opinion bit better than the Xperia S.
--
Posted: 2012-09-29 11:19:05
Edit : Quote

randomuser Posts: > 500

WoW Ricky, thanks for the shots. The TX screen looks brilliant.
Can you compare your TX against Xperia S ?
[ This Message was edited by: randomuser on 2012-09-29 11:23 ]

--
Posted: 2012-09-29 11:19:53
Edit : Quote

doministry Posts: > 500

@RickyD

Thanks for the shots and common sense here
--
Posted: 2012-09-29 12:15:57
Edit : Quote
Page <  123 ... 434445 ... 197198199>

New Topic   Reply
Forum Index

Esato home