News Forum Phone database

> New Topic
> Reply
< Esato Forum Index > Sony Ericsson / Sony > General > Post your Pictures/Videos taken by C905 Bookmark topic

my spongebob birthday cake

--
Posted: 2008-11-08 13:08:48
Edit : Quote




--
Posted: 2008-11-08 15:10:22
Edit : Quote


These photos are looking better all the time!!!!!
--
Posted: 2008-11-08 15:29:43
Edit : Quote


Superb indoor Macro Flash Quality:





And the difference in quality of 3mp, 5mp and 8mp photographs:



--
Posted: 2008-11-08 16:12:29
Edit : Quote


You misunderstood the point i was trying to make,

See how the N82 was added in this 8mp photo comparasion
http://www.esato.com/board/viewtopic.php?topic=176663

thats the point i was trying to make, the megapixel count doesn't matter the n82 actually took more detailed pics on some occassions.
--
Posted: 2008-11-08 16:20:06
Edit : Quote


Because it has excellent optics, I know. But you said regarding 3mp and 8mp pictures:



That makes no sense. It just makes the same picture bigger, and with the same level of detail?

If you take a higher resolution picture of the same object, you will capture more detail. Thats what High Resolution means. With the picture viewed at the same size, as above, you can see the difference in detail with a high resolution picture.

Why produce higher MP cameras if resolution makes no difference to levels of detail? If the picture is bigger, it has to have more detail to make the image viewable, otherwise it would be distorted.

With the N82, you have a Cameraphone with much better optics than most of its competition. High resolution pictures with poor optics will equal lower levels of detail obviously, but with all things being equal between two cameras, the resolution will make a massive difference in quality of detail.



From the examples above, you can see that isn't the case at all. The details captured in 3mp resolution are poor compared to 8mp resolution.


_________________
My Flickr Pics!

[ This Message was edited by: marty mcfly on 2008-11-08 15:52 ]
--
Posted: 2008-11-08 16:51:09
Edit : Quote


here you have a BIG camera test (allready post i think)...anyway..its good test.
http://www.phonearena.com/htm[....]son-Q4-2008-review-r_2039.html


Renoir is the winner there after seen all pics, (if you eject the Canon, because its no cellphone). C905 its the winner on flash though.


edit..Number1...you right...just watch ex, Sony Cybershoot DSC-T1 (5 m.p), its still one of the best small digi cams just because of its superior quality sensor & optic..

_________________
I C902, W810 & T29
cellphone picture collection:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/21179102@N07/
(t610, t630, k700, k750, k800, k810, k850)





[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2008-11-08 16:05 ]
--
Posted: 2008-11-08 16:56:52
Edit : Quote


Yes, thread dedicated to it already:

http://www.esato.com/board/viewtopic.php?topic=176663&start=0

The point here is that Number1 never once said anything about optics, which I agree is the single most important thing in determining photo quality. He just said 3mp and 8mp photos are the same, but different sizes, which is totally wrong.
--
Posted: 2008-11-08 17:06:54
Edit : Quote















--
Posted: 2008-11-08 17:09:56
Edit : Quote




It's no good just taking 3 different pics in different resolutions with the same phone, the phone has 8mp loaded on it's sensor so every signal pic you take is always at 8mp the phone then uses it sofware to resize it, a deadicated 3mp camphone would have just as much detail as a 8mp or probley more as less noise reduction is needed because the sensor isn't as overloaded. The s700 took more detailed pics than my C702 and thats only 1megapixel but the ccd sensor/optics made all the difference.
--
Posted: 2008-11-08 17:21:23
Edit : Quote

---

New Topic   Reply

Forum Index