>
New Topic
>
Reply<
Esato Forum Index
>
Manufacturer Discussion >
Nokia
> Nokia 808 PureView Thread And Discussion
Bookmark topic
I just love to listen to videos recorded with 808 PureView, the mic there is so good it beats the crap out of most dedicated cameras ... It makes me sad that such a wonderful technology as PureView is only used in one phone, and that's probably it... Some WP8 phones got taste of awesome mic, but as for other phones it's still stone age...
--
Posted: 2013-01-04 07:46:06
Edit :
Quote
Here is the tear down of the 808http://youtube.com/watch?v=_Er1pA6lk-A
--
Posted: 2013-01-09 20:21:00
Edit :
Quote
On 2013-01-09 20:21:00, Sean72 wrote:
Here is the tear down of the 808http://youtube.com/watch?v=_Er1pA6lk-A
You mean
http://youtube.com/watch?v=_Er1pA6lk-A
--
Posted: 2013-01-09 21:06:25
Edit :
Quote
Great piece of engineering there.. simple assembly, easy access. What I like the most about it all the heat shields on top of the chips on the main board... I wish more OEMs would pay that kind of attention to heat management.
[ This Message was edited by: cu015170 on 2013-01-10 02:18 ]
--
Posted: 2013-01-10 03:14:50
Edit :
Quote
Nokia 808 PureView PRO Vs Nokia Lumia 920 PureView LITE #BOTF12 Final !!!
http://www.fonearena.com/blog[....]808-pureview-botf12-final.html
P.S: I Voted Already On Lumia 808 PureView PRO !!!
--
Posted: 2013-01-10 04:50:00
Edit :
Quote
All About Future Cameras In Mobile Phones Nokia !!!
http://www.wpcentral.com/discussing-cameras-nokias-juha-alakarhu
A Promising Future Is Far Brilliantly !!!
P.S: Only Nokia Has Courage And Technology To Innovate In Digital Photography And Video For Mobile Phones !!! 
--
Posted: 2013-01-12 00:01:13
Edit :
Quote
that's a black 808 with a white cover ..
or the other way around.. very cool
--
Posted: 2013-01-12 08:12:37
Edit :
Quote
http://www.gsmarena.com/samsu[....]ia_808_pureview-review-873.php
Bigger sensor (bigger pixels after oversampling), better optics.. better results. I feel like the 808 can actually provide better results in the dark as well..
They made one mistake.. the sensor is FSI, not BSI. Also.. the 808 has a built in editor, no need for an "app"
--
Posted: 2013-01-16 20:27:30
Edit :
Quote
Without Doubt This Was The Worst Comparative Test Done By GSMArena !
In Addition Erroneous Information As 808 PureView PRO Count With A BSI Sensor, the Truth Even When On A Sensor Uses FSI !
They Also Missed The Technical Specifications Of Audio Recorded On Video !
After All The 808 PureView PRO Audio Captured During Video Recording Is Not 128 Kbps Bitrate And 48 kHz Sampling Rate And Yes 256 Kbps Bitrate And 48 kHz Sampling Rate !
To Cap a Succession Of Mistakes, They Were Unable To Use The 808 PureView PRO In Bad Light Conditions !
Who Owns The 808 PureView PRO, Know That By Choosing The Way We Activate Creative And ND Filter, It Increases The Exposure Time To 2.7 Seconds, Which Would Radically Change The Image Quality For The Better, Thus Annihilating The Galaxy Camera !
Finally Note Zero For This Weak Review !
--
Posted: 2013-01-16 21:15:14
Edit :
Quote
Oh ya.. I didn't notice that they missed the audio recording bit rate, but maybe their 808 is still on FP1 ? FP1 records at 128 .. fp2 is 256.
Regardless, I agree with you, not the most professional review from their team.
Either way, it proves once again that the 808 is an engineering marvel.. enjoy it
--
Posted: 2013-01-16 21:53:12
Edit :
Quote
New Topic
Reply
the 808 is sooo much better when it comes to video recording.. no even fair.