Sony Ericsson / Sony : Software, Firmware and Drivers : Super camera driver for k750/w800/w810
>
New Topic
>
Reply<
Esato Forum Index
>
Sony Ericsson / Sony >
Software, Firmware and Drivers
> Super camera driver for k750/w800/w810
Bookmark topic
shouhei
in supermode 6.0 fine is just fine

nothing more, no EM and that's why you see noise in comparison with 21.91. to be honest i'm thinking about something like "quick access profiles" under EV 0.0 and various zoom values, for example: if you want well known EM then after camera open you just have to set zoom to 1.1 and EM is enabled. this is only conception
Chopz
picture 1 and 2 - i see small underexposure (this was in old driver version)
for next two pictures if they are made with supermode 6.0 then it isn't "Kriomag 21.92" anymore

whatever you use normal or fine result will be equal - normal is dedicated for night shots (this doesn't mean EM!) and fine for everything else.
picture 4 - did you changed yellow white balance? if not then auto white balance gave too much yellow to reduce blue color (this will happen in every driver)
lord_kin0
try this same thing with other driver please
lpachuong
i saw your code only for 30sec. check LED_WB_SET and EMPTY_EVENT_FIFO (both used in D_SHOT and E_SHOT) ofcourse other things too
679
thanks for your suggestion... and NO buzzing at all
i am preparing myself for mountain expedition so i have less time to write here. from monday i will be unavailable for some time
cheers
_________________
W800 CID36 R1BD001
www.flickr.com/photos/8469432@N06/[ This Message was edited by: Raiderski on 2007-07-04 22:42 ]
--
Posted: 2007-07-04 23:41:00
Edit :
Quote
Hi all. I have just fixed the compression. Sorry about that. Now it has JPEG 89% . Tell me if the quality of the pictures are good or not. If not I will fix it soon. Also tell me whether do you want to have more compresson (95%). And also tell me what is not good about it and what else do you want from it (not super mode now). Since I found not many driver is suitable for k750i CID49, so i will try my best.
Thanks and take care
New link:
http://www.sendspace.com/file/li694a
--
Posted: 2007-07-04 23:48:05
Edit :
Quote
Hello, I am here again. This is the newest version I have made with some functions: EV correction (SPU), Sarmad colour correction, based on SE 5.3. I go to bed now and will try to post some outdoor pictures tomorow. Please try it. Good night.
Newest driver from me:
http://www.sendspace.com/file/90mvhb
--
Posted: 2007-07-05 00:56:17
Edit :
Quote
On 2007-07-04 23:48:05, lpachuong wrote:
Hi all. I have just fixed the compression. Sorry about that. Now it has JPEG 89% . Tell me if the quality of the pictures are good or not. If not I will fix it soon. Also tell me whether do you want to have more compresson (95%). And also tell me what is not good about it and what else do you want from it (not super mode now). Since I found not many driver is suitable for k750i CID49, so i will try my best.
Thanks and take care
New link:
http://www.sendspace.com/file/li694a
Hi! lpachuong
my LengStreet_v34.2 is not standard 5.3 code
if u use it pls. credit for me. :\
all ur talking is my code stage.
--
Posted: 2007-07-05 04:00:23
Edit :
Quote
Hi lengstreett. It is true that the defined words is from your driver, but i based on 5.3. You can check and compare that with the original verson. Moreover, I have combined Samard and SPU and you can see the different. Although i am new at it, I will try to make CID49 as good as CID36. If you find some things wrong, please tell me. Thank to samard and SPU and you, lengstreet. If you comment on it, please compare it with your version, lengstreet.
Your sincerely.
--
Posted: 2007-07-05 04:12:28
Edit :
Quote
@raider
a bug, when i use flash mxe-60 with supermode 6 and trying to change ev with the zoom keys in EV+03, it works like manual focus. i have a k750 cid36 R1CA
--
Posted: 2007-07-05 04:27:55
Edit :
Quote
On 2007-07-05 04:12:28, lpachuong wrote:
Hi lengstreett. It is true that the defined words is from your driver, but i based on 5.3. You can check and compare that with the original verson. Moreover, I have combined Samard and SPU and you can see the different. Although i am new at it, I will try to make CID49 as good as CID36. If you find some things wrong, please tell me. Thank to samard and SPU and you, lengstreet. If you comment on it, please compare it with your version, lengstreet.
Your sincerely.
What Differance? Base 5.3 is not code stage
i'm reduce+arrange code stage with my hand.
_________________
http://www.flickr.com/photos/lengstreet
[ This Message was edited by: lengstreet on 2007-07-05 03:29 ]
[ This Message was edited by: lengstreet on 2007-07-05 03:31 ]
--
Posted: 2007-07-05 04:28:18
Edit :
Quote
@lpachuong
don't worry. i talk about it because i want some pm or talking
before ur post, 1 thank for me.
--
Posted: 2007-07-05 04:38:40
Edit :
Quote
On 2007-07-04 23:41:00, Raiderski wrote:
shouhei
in supermode 6.0 fine is just fine

nothing more, no EM and that's why you see noise in comparison with 21.91. to be honest i'm thinking about something like "quick access profiles" under EV 0.0 and various zoom values, for example: if you want well known EM then after camera open you just have to set zoom to 1.1 and EM is enabled. this is only conception
YES something like that would be great! Thats why I suggested to use the normal/fine quality to select profiles because EM is definitely needed!
--
Posted: 2007-07-05 04:48:02
Edit :
Quote
is there any way that the normal sharpness of a driver is 6 but when you turn on the ENM then it is 5
_________________
You can find almost all the camdrivers here
http://www.4shared.com/dir/3080216/ee793bc5/sharing.html[ This Message was edited by: amarsidhu on 2007-07-05 08:46 ]
--
Posted: 2007-07-05 06:57:11
Edit :
Quote
New Topic
Reply