>
New Topic
>
Topic Locked
Esato Forum Index
>
Sony Ericsson / Sony >
General
> SE failing in producing good phones?
Bookmark topic
@SaLiH
I hope you are right this time but i was told the same thing about the 8th May announcements also and we all know what happened then. If they launch new models but still use the same processor and graphics chips it won't matter how beautiful they are to me they will be non starters and the same goes if they don't have HSDPA.
To be honest even if they have all the things i want/need i will still have to wait till after they have been released and are proven to perform as advertised as the M600 experience is still fresh in my mind and i am not going down that road again but i really do hope that SE have pulled there finger out and deliver this time as IMO it is long overdue, only 3 days and then we will know one way or the other and they will need to be released this year also.
Marc
_________________
Nokia E61 2gb Sandisk, Fring, Tom Tom 6, AD-46 with Black Shure EC2g
[ This Message was edited by: Dogmann on 2007-06-11 16:29 ]
--
Posted: 2007-06-11 17:29:02
Edit :
Quote
Now this may be a reason why "se are failing to produce good phones":
http://www.gsmarena.com/sony_ericsson_k810-1839.php
If thats SE's current flagship how come it gets such a low score
And why do they win the awards again for best mobile handset 2007 when k800 is 1. made in 2006 and 2. cant compare to the new phones now out.
Were was the phone n95 in the award?
Why does the year old k800 get best handset were its now a year old, developed in 2006, using 5 yr old technology as sapporo said and cant compare to new phones??????
[ This Message was edited by: KingBooker5 on 2007-06-11 18:33 ]
--
Posted: 2007-06-11 19:31:13
Edit :
Quote
On 2007-06-11 19:31:13, KingBooker5 wrote:
Now this may be a reason why "se are failing to produce good phones":
http://www.gsmarena.com/sony_ericsson_k810-1839.php
If thats SE's current flagship how come it gets such a low score
And why do they win the awards again for best mobile handset 2007 when k800 is 1. made in 2006 and 2. cant compare to the new phones now out.
Were was the phone n95 in the award?
Why does the year old k800 get best handset were its now a year old, developed in 2006, using 5 yr old technology as sapporo said and cant compare to new phones??????
[ This Message was edited by: KingBooker5 on 2007-06-11 18:33 ]
Is it a smartphone? Does it run more than just Java?
My god this is getting boring and predictable. Time to close this thread. It has run its course.
_________________
*edited on a Mac of course. Mac: There is no substitute*
-/..../../...//.../../-/.//../...//--./---/../-./--.//-/---//-/...././/-../-
[ This Message was edited by: sapporobaby on 2007-06-11 19:04 ]
--
Posted: 2007-06-11 20:01:54
Edit :
Quote
I remember I moved from nokia to SE at the time the T610 was released because it was better featured and much more desirable then Nokias phones.
Right now Nokia have the N95, and SE are yet to release the K850i. Although the N95 is a lot better featured then what SE currently has, I desire the T650i purely for its looks and size rather then the N95.
I have never been a fan of brick sized phones and never will be. Surely the N95 has great features, but I wouldnt like to carry one around in my pocket.
Nokia have always been first with the new technology on brick sized phones, then SE usually come along a while later with slimmed down nicer looking versions which I would rather have.
There is absolutely nothing that would convince me to get the N95 over the T650i, even if they were the same price.
--
Posted: 2007-06-11 20:16:10
Edit :
Quote
Nokia also has smaller sized phones like N73, N76.
--
Posted: 2007-06-11 20:19:43
Edit :
Quote
On 2007-06-11 20:19:43, QVGA wrote:
Nokia also has smaller sized phones like N73, N76.
Dude, no matter what you say it will not matter. Some like SE and are happy with less, while others like something different. TO each his/her own.
--
Posted: 2007-06-11 20:24:56
Edit :
Quote
On 2007-06-11 16:38:32, sapporobaby wrote:
@SaLiH,,
The problem is that maybe it is too late. I am sure I am not the only person to switch from SE to Nokia. If as little as 1% shifted, this represents quite a few ex-SE customers, thus revenue. For me, SE would have to create something pretty spectacular to come even close to the N95, and even if they do, I have seen SE's track record of addressing issues with their phones and their customer service. It is abysmal.
"The problem is that maybe it is too late",- to late for what ? switch from SE to Nokia (why in hell would someone do that. SE only gets better and better). will you please stop talking rubbish !
edit. the only thing i can agree off, is that ex, N95 have better video recording quality. nothing else impress on me).
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2007-06-11 19:31 ]
--
Posted: 2007-06-11 20:25:38
Edit :
Quote
On 2007-06-11 20:25:38, plankgatan wrote:
On 2007-06-11 16:38:32, sapporobaby wrote:
@SaLiH,,
The problem is that maybe it is too late. I am sure I am not the only person to switch from SE to Nokia. If as little as 1% shifted, this represents quite a few ex-SE customers, thus revenue. For me, SE would have to create something pretty spectacular to come even close to the N95, and even if they do, I have seen SE's track record of addressing issues with their phones and their customer service. It is abysmal.
"The problem is that maybe it is too late",- to late for what ? switch from SE to Nokia (why in hell would someone do that. SE only gets better and better). will you please stop talking rubbish !
The only thing rubbish in this thread is the unsupported trash that you talk post after post after post. It is not even a language problem. You just are not that smart when it comes to this technology. Your posts are proof of this. Go back and read some of the tripe that you post. You make claims, don't back them up, then when you try (remember the zooming crap you said), you change your story. Give it up dude. You look silly.
--
Posted: 2007-06-11 20:29:10
Edit :
Quote
On 2007-06-11 20:19:43, QVGA wrote:
Nokia also has smaller sized phones like N73, N76.
The N73 is rather ugly, and I dont like clamshell phones (N76)
Also, I am limited to the range of phones T-mobile has to offer, and none of the Nokia ones they have apeal to me. If I wer to upgrade right now, I would only want the K810i. The LG prada is my favorite looking one, but it lacks the features I would expect at the least.
Oh, and to answer the OP, SE are still the only company making good phones for me.
[ This Message was edited by: Bhavv on 2007-06-11 19:54 ]
--
Posted: 2007-06-11 20:47:36
Edit :
Quote
On 2007-06-11 20:47:36, Bhavv wrote:
On 2007-06-11 20:19:43, QVGA wrote:
Nokia also has smaller sized phones like N73, N76.
The N73 is rather ugly, and I dont like clamshell phones (N76)
Also, I am limited to the range of phones T-mobile has to offer, and none of the Nokia ones they have apeal to me. If I wer to upgrade right now, I would only want the K810i. The LG prada is my favorite looking one, but it lacks the features I would expect at the least.
Oh, and to answer the OP, SE are still the only company making good phones for me.
[ This Message was edited by: Bhavv on 2007-06-11 19:54 ]
Define good.
--
Posted: 2007-06-11 21:12:26
Edit :
Quote
New Topic
Topic Locked
