>
New Topic
>
Reply<
Esato Forum Index
>
Sony Ericsson / Sony >
General
> Official K800i & K790i discussion
Bookmark topic
No it doesnt. Im not sure how many frames per second but its qcif. The w900 was a one off as it had a built in Nvidea GeForce card which allowed it to film at such a high rate.
As i said the spec says qcif but at the same time in th w810 white paper the number of fps was stated. This could be down to a number of things. The white paper was an early edition at wich time SE wernt sure about what framerate to implement. This is which many of the detailed reviews such as the one in mobile-review did not publish examples of video capture. ................................
There is one set of videos floating around from Spain supposedly showing good video capture, but i dont know if its true or not.
You must also bear in mind that the white paper we have seen is an early version and a new one may be updated soon. The idea of whitepaper updates is to reflect changes to the phone - ie: possible higher frametrate capture for video.
[ This Message was edited by: bavlondon2 on 2006-04-18 14:26 ]
--
Posted: 2006-04-18 09:02:17
Edit :
Quote
Quote:
On 2006-04-17 23:34:55, dreamfish wrote:
02's website says July 06 for the k800
I cant find this on the website? Do you have a link. Thats a bummer as i was hoping it would be June liek CPW said
--
Posted: 2006-04-18 15:43:13
Edit :
Quote
o2 Coming soon page as requested
--
Posted: 2006-04-18 16:07:26
Edit :
Quote
damn!!!!!!!!
Why, why ?
Well i suppose it suits me in the sense that i dont have to terminate my contract early just to take out a new contract for this.
--
Posted: 2006-04-18 16:14:45
Edit :
Quote
Quote:
On 2006-04-18 09:02:17, bavlondon2 wrote:
The w900 was a one off as it had a built in Nvidea GeForce card which allowed it to film at such a high rate.
You got an official statement from SE to support that claim ?
--
Posted: 2006-04-18 23:21:30
Edit :
Quote
Quote:
On 2006-04-18 23:21:30, etaab wrote:
Quote:
On 2006-04-18 09:02:17, bavlondon2 wrote:
The w900 was a one off as it had a built in Nvidea GeForce card which allowed it to film at such a high rate.
You got an official statement from SE to support that claim ?
The reason you probabaly wont see that sort of resolution for filming in phoines more fro SE is because having that card on the phons hardware puts a strain on the battery.
Its a fact that the only reason the w900 can shoot in such high res modce is becasue there is an on board graphics card made by Nvidia. Infact heres a quote:
The model is experimental to kick the interface and graphic accelerator with resolution
Due to the 3D accelerator it became possible to get video records of resolution of 240õ320 pixels and frequency of 30 frames per second.
http://www.mobile-review.com/review/sonyericsson-w900-en.shtml
If SE plannd to keep using this new inteface dont you think theywould have used it within the k800. Dont get me wrong but if SE need to sacrifice asome battery time to accomodate good video recoding then thats what they should do. I mean even Nokia 6280 takes better video. I mean that shoots in VGA. Ill probabaly end up eating my word cos SE will soon announce another lot of phones but for the time being video capture is one area where SE is behind the rest of the market.
[ This Message was edited by: bavlondon2 on 2006-04-19 07:59 ]
--
Posted: 2006-04-19 08:56:49
Edit :
Quote
A good point, but i dont think its correct.
SE have always had rather lazy video recording implementation, and they've always been behind Nokia, Samsung and Sharp. I dont think its anything to do with the W900i's hardware why the K800i does not have better video recording, its to do with SE cutting corners or possibly assuming most customers would not use the function and so force video to be used for MMS.
The P990i has higher resolution video recording, and it has no added Nvidia hardware AFAIK. I'd put it all down to the W900i simply being a faster phone, as is the P990i. The K800i still probably uses the same chipset components as the K750i.
Thats the reason why when and if i do buy the K800i, it'll be on PAYG rather than sim free, meaning it'll cost me less, or unless i get an absolute bargain for one. When its released, i dont intend to rush out and buy one.
_________________
http://www.werenotafraid.com[ This Message was edited by: etaab on 2006-04-19 18:18 ]
--
Posted: 2006-04-19 19:17:12
Edit :
Quote
^ good, the k750 is an amazing phone... and certainly a winner until its times up, when the next lot of high-end phones come out.
--
Posted: 2006-04-19 20:43:50
Edit :
Quote
Etaab you are wrong about chipset,k800 have stronger one
This message was posted from a K750
--
Posted: 2006-04-19 21:14:21
Edit :
Quote
Quote:
On 2006-04-19 19:17:12, etaab wrote:
A good point, but i dont think its correct.
SE have always had rather lazy video recording implementation, and they've always been behind Nokia, Samsung and Sharp. I dont think its anything to do with the W900i's hardware why the K800i does not have better video recording, its to do with SE cutting corners or possibly assuming most customers would not use the function and so force video to be used for MMS.
The P990i has higher resolution video recording, and it has no added Nvidia hardware AFAIK. I'd put it all down to the W900i simply being a faster phone, as is the P990i. The K800i still probably uses the same chipset components as the K750i.
Thats the reason why when and if i do buy the K800i, it'll be on PAYG rather than sim free, meaning it'll cost me less, or unless i get an absolute bargain for one. When its released, i dont intend to rush out and buy one.
_________________
http://www.werenotafraid.com
[ This Message was edited by: etaab on 2006-04-19 18:18 ]
--
Posted: 2006-04-19 22:25:27
Edit :
Quote
New Topic
Reply
