News Forum Phone database

> New Topic
> Reply
< Esato Forum Index > General discussions > Other manufacturers > nokia n95 - hsdpa, wifi, 5mp camera, gps at 90cc Bookmark topic

All SE phones comparated with n95 is just like toys! SE have fools in their marketing section! SE is very SLOWLY!

This message was posted from a K750i
--
Posted: 2006-09-27 15:51:48
Edit : Quote


first the battery in the n95 right now is 950mah... which is way too weak... since nokia's haven't been know to be the most battery efficient imo....

i've used the n80.. i gave it 3 chances.. and the battery life is terrible making the phone a pure waste. i got about 16 hours out of it... tried about 3 different firmwares as well.. i wanted to like it soo bad cause i was bored with SE's midrange and 1 highend lineup

the n73 and n93 however pack respectable batteries
Nokia Battery BP-6M (1100mAH), i had no issues with either of these phones in regards to battery
why on earth would nokia not use that battery in the n95 or at least the same capacity???

for the ones that you that think you need a touchscreen or the device is doomed lol.. se is getting it's butt kicked in the smartphone department so get real...

SE needs to drop these UIQ touchscreen phones and launch 2-3 hardkey all in one devices with comparable specs based on UIQ and then we can finally see some real action... but right now UIQ doesn't stand a chance against s60

but then again... they've never been in the running... just a bunch of hardcore se junkies... like everyone on these forums like myself
_________________
Shaolinmonk on HOFO Official PHONE JUNKIE
MyProfile http://www.howardforums.com/m[....]s=&action=getinfo&userid=20841

[ This Message was edited by: DragonEye on 2006-09-27 15:13 ]
--
Posted: 2006-09-27 16:07:34
Edit : Quote


Damn they always leave something out! I'd rather have a phone as fat as the N80 with a new 1500 battery and the 8gb harddrive. The limitations of the FAT miniSD card size are starting to become apparent.
Hell the phone would still be tiny for what it can do.
--
Posted: 2006-09-27 17:53:00
Edit : Quote


@ darky - you appear to be the ignorant one mate, lack of touchscreen does not automatically mean a bad phone which you appear to have said.

@ Prom1 - im sure if you did use wi-fi heavily you would have an issue with battery life, but i doubt the N80 would last less than a full day for you, and the N93 would last longer.

A slight correction however, apparently the BP-6M battery the N93 uses is a 1100mAh capacity, which is significantly larger than the N80's. DragonEye also pointed this out, which i double checked with Nokia's specs.

@ QVGA - we say high definition when compared to the natural average screen resolution. The N80 has a resolution of 352x416 pixels, compared to QVGA screens of 240x320, its significantly larger and better in resolution.

@ to everyone in general, take a look at the picture in the following link:

http://www.mobile-review.com/[....]6/nokia-openstudio-ny-en.shtml

And here it is courtesy of mobile-review.com..



The N95 isnt much larger than the tiny (IMO) N80. All i can say is SUPERB !:D

--
Posted: 2006-09-27 18:58:49
Edit : Quote


the N80 isn't tiny to me.
And MR's hands are HUGE.

"SE needs to drop these UIQ touchscreen phones"

No they don't, It's a different market. It's the Symbian PDA market...
I don't know about others but I was saying that if it had a touch screen it would be perfect for me.

UIQ 3 is having it's problems because it's a fresh system but UIQ 2 was fine, there was TONS of support.

The reason why there is alot of S60 support is because many people use Nokia's and Nokia was smart enough to use S60 in ALOT of their phones.

I really need to hold one of these in my hands. It's specs are great at the moment. I hope it comes in a 'white' variant.

as for the High definition comment, I have to say that I will forcefully 'not' call it High definition, simply because it is not. What happens when there is a higher res? Are we going to call it Super high definition?
_________________
The Cheapest UK Mobile Contracts Guaranteed! | Compare all mobile deals on the net.
áÇÝä ÈäÛÍÈÉ - Razor Ramon HG

[ This Message was edited by: amnesia on 2006-09-27 18:09 ]
--
Posted: 2006-09-27 19:02:59
Edit : Quote


God its a brick! N80 is certainly not tiny!
--
Posted: 2006-09-27 19:08:05
Edit : Quote


Is a bit smaller then the N70 ! Not by much thou. Certainly not a brick - next to the P990i looks small indeed :D remember this is the most featured cell on the market ! In my opinion the screen is a bit to big for a S60 (almost as big as the P990i) others may like it like this thou.

This message was posted from a N70-1
--
Posted: 2006-09-27 19:38:53
Edit : Quote


I suppose it depends on proportions. Im a rather large guy over 6 feet tall and with large hands, to me the N93 is a nice size, the K750i especially its keypad was too small, the N80 seems tiny to me.

So, the N95 will seem tiny to me. I love it, alot, even its sides i like the look of which normally is something i find boring. If you feel the N80 and N95 are large phones, you probably have smaller lady-like feminine hands or different body proportions resulting in things appearing larger to you than others.

@ amnesia - when we were using Nokia phones with 176x208 size screens, 176x220 was labelled high definition, when were were using 176x220 screens as standard QVGA screens were labelled high definition, and now that 352x416 or even VGA screens are appearing in handsets, they too are labelled high definition.

Dont think of the term high definition as the same thing you'd find in a HD TV, its not, its simply a label the media give to phones in this business with higher resolution screens than the average screen resolution. As technology moves on, so does the label as to what is considered a high definiton resolution within a mobile phone.

_________________
http://www.werenotafraid.com

[ This Message was edited by: etaab on 2006-09-27 18:53 ]
--
Posted: 2006-09-27 19:52:46
Edit : Quote


I know what you mean etaab, I simply think that the use of the term High Definition is wrong.
--
Posted: 2006-09-27 19:54:40
Edit : Quote


Possibly, since like i said its easy to assume that when using the term its the same one as when applied to HD TV, which is many times higher in resolution than VGA or 352x416.
--
Posted: 2006-09-27 19:55:45
Edit : Quote

---

New Topic   Reply

Forum Index