>
New Topic
>
Reply<
Esato Forum Index
>
General discussions >
Other manufacturers
> Is the N95 all it's made out to be?
Bookmark topic
well, just put a nokia e60, e70 and n73 next to each other and u ll see the huge difference.
--
Posted: 2007-05-08 14:59:49
Edit :
Quote
786KBR
I have a N95, I cant see the 16M colours!!
Then you are either color-blind or blind
Same as you I am just being sarcastic.
[ This Message was edited by: mib1800 on 2007-05-08 14:16 ]
--
Posted: 2007-05-08 15:15:12
Edit :
Quote
n95 is overall sucks it has some good futures but not anything special
--
Posted: 2007-05-10 00:49:07
Edit :
Quote
On 2007-05-08 15:15:12, mib1800 wrote:
786KBR
I have a N95, I cant see the 16M colours!!
Then you are either color-blind or blind
Same as you I am just being sarcastic.
[ This Message was edited by: mib1800 on 2007-05-08 14:16 ]
The human eye doesnt differentiate much between 262k and 16Mil colours.
If it were VGA screen instead of QVGA or had the resolution of the N80 screen then that would be something else. But on the whole 16m colours isnt that big a deal.
--
Posted: 2007-05-10 13:40:40
Edit :
Quote
On 2007-05-10 13:40:40, bavlondon2 wrote:
The human eye doesnt differentiate much between 262k and 16Mil colours.
mmm... actually it does. The reason 16 million colours is called "true colour" (24bit), is for the very reason that the human eye can distinguish between 16.7 million different shades of colour within the visible light spectrum.
I can certainly tell the difference between 65000 colours (16bit) and 16.7 million on a computer screen, and I fully expect to be able to tell the difference between 262000 and 16mil (though I've yet to see an N95 side by side with an N93).
--
Posted: 2007-05-10 16:17:34
Edit :
Quote
Hi Max,
That's not actually a great example as i had tested my N93 against the N95 screen well actually on 4 altogether and with both set on 50% brightness using similar themes the N93's screen although not 16m colours was actually sharper and clearer and just looked better.
Although the E61's screen against the N93 the E61 was better, it has been suggested to me this is partially due to the fact that both the N93 and E61 have hard covers on the screens.
Marc
_________________
Nokia E61 2gb Sandisk, Fring, Tom Tom 6, AD-46 with Black Shure EC2g
[ This Message was edited by: Dogmann on 2007-05-10 15:31 ]
--
Posted: 2007-05-10 16:30:51
Edit :
Quote
Dogman, I agree that more colours doesn't necessarily look better, I just meant it would be easy enough to tell the finer graduations (due to more colours)
A bright well backlit screen will always look better than a higer resolution higher colour poorly backlit screen. There are also questions of contrast and brightness, and the material used as you say.
--
Posted: 2007-05-10 16:35:14
Edit :
Quote
dogmann:
N93's screen although not 16m colours was actually sharper and clearer and just looked better.
like max said, shaper is not due to color. N93 is smaller than N95 so it should be sharper. More colors give a better representation of photo/video.
--
Posted: 2007-05-10 17:02:57
Edit :
Quote
On 2007-05-10 17:02:57, mib1800 wrote:
dogmann:
N93's screen although not 16m colours was actually sharper and clearer and just looked better.
like max said, shaper is not due to color. N93 is smaller than N95 so it should be sharper. More colors give a better representation of photo/video.
But how good is the difference? I used the N95 the whole weekend and never noticed much, and I did investigate the screen against different things and only on Monday did I read here on Esato that it was a 16 mill colour screen.
--
Posted: 2007-05-10 17:12:08
Edit :
Quote
n93 is a cz fone, so nokia focused really hard imo on the csreen, probably that makes it feel and look better. just look at 6131. it has 16m screen but crap resolution, so it looks the same as 6233 with 262k screen.
--
Posted: 2007-05-10 17:15:12
Edit :
Quote
New Topic
Reply
