Esato Mobile
Sony Ericsson / Sony : Software, Firmware and Drivers : Camera Drivers Sony Ericsson for Series W/K/Z/VGA
> New Topic
> Reply
< Esato Forum Index > Sony Ericsson / Sony > Software, Firmware and Drivers > Camera Drivers Sony Ericsson for Series W/K/Z/VGA Bookmark topic
Page <  123 ... 567 ... 383940>

djburno2000 Posts: 66

Ok, I installed your driver using XS++
everything went without any problems.

Now, about using the driver.

Basically, I noticed no difference between Night mode and No night mode.
Pics just looks the same.

NolightNoNight.JPG:


NolightNightActive.JPG:


Also, for the metering, it sometimes doesn't work. Closing and opening the camera usually make it work.
Then as soon as you take a picture, it stays blocked to the metered it used for that pic.
But it's like if you take a photo in light environment then it will keep these setting so for example just after that you take a photo of the computer screen and it's just blaring light.
Start by taking the computer screen and it will stay adjusted for that so in a light room the photos get very dark.

MeteringLightNoNight1.JPG:


MeteringLightNoNight2.JPG:


MeteringLightNoNight3.JPG:


MeteringLightNoNight4.JPG:



I hope my explanations are clear enough.

Do not hesitate to contact me for more info.

Thanks for your job anyway!

Cheers.


--
Posted: 2008-01-05 10:10:09
Edit : Quote

brazzuka's Posts: > 500

Vga resolution changes are not visible, obviously resolutions with the greatest amount of rows lines, columns and pixels changes are more visible.
The z530 model works with the same chip limiter for cameras vga as k310, w300, w200 but in the w200 the chip is more updated and each model has its own type of hardware in the case of the z530 I do not know how it behave the same hardware as being basically the same chip vga resolutions for the hardware maybe have differently than other models vga.
On the way w200 night has a slight change was almost never see.

Properties and functions are essentially the same hardware but each will respond with the excitement of the functions, this is the same property in a model can work well but in another model does not work because the chip limits its actions.
Many of the properties of the w200 already this now working for the w300 and some work, I don´t know how to work on a z530 would have to test the driver to see how it behave.


A video recording camera compare with some of them is the program quicktime so you can see how this recording by fps, the higher the better fps the sensitivity of the video but can also change other features.

A reflection of the light from each object is essential and that is the limitation of the hardware with resolutions vga beyond chip inhibit their actions a hardware limiter will not respond to all of reflection of light colors, because each color has a different wavelength, basically it is not therefore depend very simple work of the party and not only physically programming.

We will work with the driver z530 adding some properties to see how the driver is behaving.

Tnks for your comments because only then can better adjust the driver of the z530 course following its limitations and capabilities.

Cheers
Beers and Wine!!!


--
Posted: 2008-01-05 14:40:29
Edit : Quote

brazzuka's Posts: > 500


// Sony Ericsson CamDriver v5.0 by BrAzUkA´s for k310
// Version 5.0 BrAzUka´s
// Optimized for the Sony Ericsson k310
// ** Works with Series W and K ** k310/k320
// Based on version driver cam W200 and based drivers Series W and K
--
Posted: 2008-01-06 03:10:41
Edit : Quote

brazzuka's Posts: > 500



// Sony Ericsson CamDriver Version 5.5 by BrAzUkA´s for k510
// Version 5.5 BrAzUkA´s
// Based on the series w and k cibershot and versions of AJ/AH/FG and JCmonx
// Optimized for the Sony Ericsson k510

-New Brightness
-New Contrast
-New Sharpening
-Focus test
-Spot Photometry
-Photo metering
-Super Color™ for k510
-New Sequence JPEG compression level
-New Sequence Nigth mode

download:

http://brazzukas.4shared.com/

--
Posted: 2008-01-06 15:06:52
Edit : Quote

drvodka Posts: 19

Hi, I've just tried your 5.5 driver for K510... and I think there's something wrong about how it handles colors. Before yours I've been using JcmonX's 5.30, thought I'd tell you, because you mentioned it on the above post. I tested your driver on a K510 (obviously) using firmware R4EA031.

Have a look:

Taken with jcmonx's 5.30
http://img244.imageshack.us/my.php?image=relojconluzsk8.jpg
http://img240.imageshack.us/my.php?image=lampar4aiy6.jpg
http://img167.imageshack.us/my.php?image=libro1ky8.jpg
http://img162.imageshack.us/my.php?image=libro2lp9.jpg

Taken with yours 5.50
http://img240.imageshack.us/my.php?image=relojconluzzh4.jpg http://img174.imageshack.us/my.php?image=lamparael1.jpg
http://img167.imageshack.us/my.php?image=libro1ic3.jpg
http://img167.imageshack.us/my.php?image=libro2om0.jpg

I included jcmonx's just for the sake of having a comparison of real colors (5.30) and wrong colors (5.50).

Think you can correct this? Because it looks like a great driver. Apart from the pixelation it has, I believe it has problems about how it handles light levels, when I put the camera right on a really bright thing, like a lamp, it doesn't adjust exposure so it takes the picture correctly, hope you understand what I said.

I know your thing are w200 drivers and not k510's, but I suppose that if those problems are corrected, then this driver would shine.

I can't test them with sunlight right now, well, because, it's night so tomorrow I'll tell you how it does under such light.



[ This Message was edited by: drvodka on 2008-01-07 02:13 ]

[ This Message was edited by: drvodka on 2008-01-07 02:17 ]

[ This Message was edited by: drvodka on 2008-01-07 02:19 ]
--
Posted: 2008-01-07 03:08:45
Edit : Quote

brazzuka's Posts: > 500

[quote]
On 2008-01-07 03:08:45, drvodka wrote:
Hi, I've just tried your 5.5 driver for K510... and I think there's something wrong about how it handles colors. Before yours I've been using JcmonX's 5.30, thought I'd tell you, because you mentioned it on the above post. I tested your driver on a K510 (obviously) using firmware R4EA031.

Have a look:

Taken with jcmonx's 5.30
http://img244.imageshack.us/my.php?image=relojconluzsk8.jpg
http://img240.imageshack.us/my.php?image=lampar4aiy6.jpg
http://img167.imageshack.us/my.php?image=libro1ky8.jpg
http://img162.imageshack.us/my.php?image=libro2lp9.jpg

Taken with yours 5.50
http://img240.imageshack.us/my.php?image=relojconluzzh4.jpg http://img174.imageshack.us/my.php?image=lamparael1.jpg
http://img167.imageshack.us/my.php?image=libro1ic3.jpg
http://img167.imageshack.us/my.php?image=libro2om0.jpg

I included jcmonx's just for the sake of having a comparison of real colors (5.30) and wrong colors (5.50).

Think you can correct this? Because it looks like a great driver. Apart from the pixelation it has, I believe it has problems about how it handles light levels, when I put the camera right on a really bright thing, like a lamp, it doesn't adjust exposure so it takes the picture correctly, hope you understand what I said.

I know your thing are w200 drivers and not k510's, but I suppose that if those problems are corrected, then this driver would shine.

I can't test them with sunlight right now, well, because, it's night so tomorrow I'll tell you how it does under such light.

drvodka

Realmente há erros talvez seja o balanço , white balance com as mudanças de algumas propriedades o white balance ficou inapropriado para a versão.Talvez mudando os valores e a estrutura do white balance volte as cores reais.
Uma coisa que percebi que as fotos mesmo com essa resolução de cam 1,3mb sai com muito ruido podendo assim ser o hardware que não trabalhe bem.
Para suavizar o ruido deveremos fazer mudanças no white balance como em outras propriedades e reativar as cores da fotografia.
Segue fazendo os testes por somente assim será aprimorado o driver k510 e talvez podendo ter o seu verdadeiro potencial do driver.

Obrigado Gracias Thanks!
--
Posted: 2008-01-07 12:52:45
Edit : Quote

brazzuka's Posts: > 500

k510

-new sequence white balance for test
-add new properties mirroring vertical and horizontal
-new sequence initial


need to test the driver

download

http://brazzukas.4shared.com/
--
Posted: 2008-01-07 13:18:44
Edit : Quote

drvodka Posts: 19

Ok, Here are my test results with the new 5.5 driver you posted. I've applied the "move sys to others" patch, so it's really easy to test drivers, just connect the phone to the PC, and move files around

5.30
http://img292.imageshack.us/img292/5412/dsc00011mo2.jpg
http://img179.imageshack.us/img179/7789/dsc00014km2.jpg

5.50 old
http://img146.imageshack.us/img146/4158/dsc00015xk2.jpg
http://img146.imageshack.us/img146/1017/dsc00016xm5.jpg

5.50 new
http://img230.imageshack.us/img230/3463/dsc00001sb1.jpg
http://img230.imageshack.us/img230/8664/dsc00002to9.jpg
http://img161.imageshack.us/img161/7977/dsc00003hx8.jpg

Well, colours are the same on that plant, but look at picture that has been taken behind the door. Look, the colours got better there, but there's still that washed out look. Certainly you've improved the driver, and it's shaping up to be a great driver. I almost forget it, now the camera adjusts exposure accordingly to the light conditions.

BTW, my K510's camera hardware isn't damaged. That extreme noise only happens with your driver...

--
Posted: 2008-01-07 17:59:05
Edit : Quote

brazzuka's Posts: > 500

[quote]
On 2008-01-07 17:59:05, drvodka wrote:
Ok, Here are my test results with the new 5.5 driver you posted. I've applied the "move sys to others" patch, so it's really easy to test drivers, just connect the phone to the PC, and move files around

5.30
http://img292.imageshack.us/img292/5412/dsc00011mo2.jpg
http://img179.imageshack.us/img179/7789/dsc00014km2.jpg

5.50 old
http://img146.imageshack.us/img146/4158/dsc00015xk2.jpg
http://img146.imageshack.us/img146/1017/dsc00016xm5.jpg

5.50 new
http://img230.imageshack.us/img230/3463/dsc00001sb1.jpg
http://img230.imageshack.us/img230/8664/dsc00002to9.jpg
http://img161.imageshack.us/img161/7977/dsc00003hx8.jpg

Well, colours are the same on that plant, but look at picture that has been taken behind the door. Look, the colours got better there, but there's still that washed out look. Certainly you've improved the driver, and it's shaping up to be a great driver. I almost forget it, now the camera adjusts exposure accordingly to the light conditions.

BTW, my K510's camera hardware isn't damaged. That extreme noise only happens with your driver...

drvodka

new sequence power
change of sequence power by star clock cam for 13mhz
change the video recording and display video by 27mhz and 48mhz
cam_i2c_address=5d; //micron adress is correct fix

-add
properties exposure and flick correction in sequence initial

change de sequence macros initial cam

seq_init =
05 02 00 0B D0 #CMD_END; 05 02 00 0C 07 #CMD_END; //JPEG retry time max 2 sec
06 02 00 01 00 52 #CMD_END; //Default no mirroring
05 02 00 18 00 #CMD_END; //JPEG continuos mode infinite
06 02 00 01 00 41 #CMD_END; //Normal focus mode
06 02 00 01 08 56 #CMD_END; // Sharpness 08
06 02 00 01 08 04 #CMD_END; // Shutter speed
06 02 00 01 80 05 #CMD_END; // ISO 100
06 02 00 01 0A 06 #CMD_END; // Exposure
06 02 00 01 00 21 #CMD_END; // Flicker correction
06 02 00 01 00 08 #CMD_END; // Spot photometry

#GET_SENSOR_VERSION;

[[[ #WRITE_ISP(01 0000)
#WRITE_ISP(#INIT_ISP_REG)
#SEQ_INIT_ISP
#SEQ_GAMMA_055 //Gamma curve
#WRITE_CONTROL(9D C508) //Black Alarm (9D 1A08)
#WRITE_CONTROL(9B 40D9) //Dynamic Target Luma Parameters
$s9 00 //Flash disabled, use internal reg 9 as a flag for the flash property
$s8 00 //Flash fire flag disabled => no flash fired. Reg 8 as flag.
#WRITE_CONTROL(FF 8884) //Blue and Red flash-gain
#WRITE_IFP(47 1030) //Default Noise reduction
#WRITE_IFP(9D 3CAE)
//#WRITE_CONTROL(2F D100) //Classic AE
#SEQ_LENS_SHADING_CORRECTION
#WRITE_IFP(05 000F) //APERTURE CORRECTION(SHARPENING) GAIN
#SEQ_COLOUR_CORRECTION_MATRIX]]]]]]


I don´t know whether these functions too respond to hardware as repeated tasks with the same functions no way changes the configuration of the driver also think it could reomve that function because they are described in the above schedule.


[[[seq_ping= #READ_ISP(35 $f $r2 0 1)
$"DSP_0x35_%0_%1"
#READ_SENSOR(00 $r2 0 1) // Read two bytes from Sensor core register and store them in camera driver internal register 0 and 1
$"Camera_0x00_%0_%1"
;]]]

I think that these functions are not needed because they don´t have the answer in hardware k510 then could remove them.
I do´t know why the processor chips was working with a frenquency high than he supported



--
Posted: 2008-01-07 19:13:26
Edit : Quote

drvodka Posts: 19

I see you uploaded a newer driver, with some changes. Unfortunately, now the camera doesn't work correctly. I made a video to explain what happens, it's difficult for me to explain such a thing not in my mother language.

First, I try to take a picture, but the camera shows a green screen, then hangs and closes. Then, I change drivers back to 5.30's, and it works.

http://rapidshare.com/files/82080378/MVI_0580proc.avi.html
--
Posted: 2008-01-08 00:26:35
Edit : Quote
Page <  123 ... 567 ... 383940>

New Topic   Reply
Forum Index

Esato home