>
New Topic
>
Reply<
Esato Forum Index
>
Sony Ericsson / Sony >
General
> Wat would make the k850 better
Bookmark topic
What would make it better ?, a bloomin great purple filter glued over the lens
--
Posted: 2007-12-14 22:58:08
Edit :
Quote
On 2007-12-14 22:10:23, plankgatan wrote:
think the D-Pad is awesome...so much better, easier to search among photos, music...................i want my D-Pad..
ps...give me access to
camera software and i optimize the light sensor myself....how hard can it be
..(i have 8 univeristey points in JAVE and C++....he he he...eeeehhhhhh
_________________
I
K850,
W810 &
T29
------------------------------------
____________________________________
(t610, t630, k700, k750, k800, k810)
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2007-12-14 21:26 ]
I actualy have to agree with plank here. I have tried out the D pad on k850, its a wonderful expiriance
--
Posted: 2007-12-14 23:02:22
Edit :
Quote
I have no problem with the d-pad, I think its a bold development which I am sure will be developed further.
The keypad buttons, while well spaced, should be made a bit wider as texting takes some getting used to e.g if you are a heavy texter you may find dimples appearing in your thumb-faces after a while and you find yourself using the tips of your thumb instead so IMO the keypad buttons should be a bit wider and the space between them reduced.
However, when the phone is inside the Krusell case it seems much easier to text with.
--
Posted: 2007-12-14 23:20:40
Edit :
Quote
I think K850 will be better if you put optical zoom on its lens. Just a thought (only stupid
). Just kidding.
--
Posted: 2007-12-14 23:21:09
Edit :
Quote
some of camera quality issues (colors/contrast/brightness) can be prosaic: cheap filter in front of lens, also known as lens protection layer. i'm watching at cameras in N95, N82 and K850 - filters in nokia phones are a bit violet, SE filter is clean (full transparent). my opinion: Nokia is using some kind of polarizing filters while SE filter is only ultraviolet. this simple difference can seriously affect on visual quality, example:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:CircularPolarizer.jpg
that's enough about camera from my side
--
Posted: 2007-12-14 23:27:59
Edit :
Quote
the camera is very good, in my believe one of the best on the market....(IF the camera had been bad...you had never got so good pics like we do)....
its all about the camera software...special the light sensor i think...and im sure that
will fix this small issue..
_________________
I
K850,
W810 &
T29
------------------------------------
____________________________________
(t610, t630, k700, k750, k800, k810)
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2007-12-14 22:53 ]
--
Posted: 2007-12-14 23:48:25
Edit :
Quote
i'm not saying that K850 camera is bad but i should be blind to say that is as good (in photos quality) as in Nxx. is this really so hard to accept? not for me. "its all about the camera software..." - no, you're wrong. did you ever found improved (visible) camera quality in previous firmware updates? they can correct a bit in driver but don't expect too much. i spent many months modifying 2MP drivers and... hardware is always most important thing. if hardware is limping then firmware will not help. you can or not agree, this is free world
[ This Message was edited by: Raiderski on 2007-12-15 08:38 ]
--
Posted: 2007-12-15 09:19:25
Edit :
Quote
mmm......small keys....anyone think abt typing a sms in k850.....
--
Posted: 2007-12-15 19:51:40
Edit :
Quote
then how cum mobile-review has a much better review for the k850 than gsmarena..it actually pulverized n95 and g800 in front of the k850...
--
Posted: 2007-12-16 07:49:08
Edit :
Quote
for me..the wi-fi support and uiq3 firmware would make it better. that way the phone has a wider range of programs and better performance.
--
Posted: 2007-12-17 05:13:35
Edit :
Quote
New Topic
Reply
