Esato Mobile
Sony Ericsson / Sony : General : G900 Another disappoinment? G900vsN82vsSamsung Soul
> New Topic
> Reply
< Esato Forum Index > Sony Ericsson / Sony > General > G900 Another disappoinment? G900vsN82vsSamsung Soul Bookmark topic
Page <  123456

chombos1 Posts: > 500

@eddieadams

indeed everyone will enjoy a CCD sensor in their camphones.... but the M-R samples are by no means the real picture quality of the G900i... (dirty lens or faulty sensor)
--
Posted: 2008-04-18 09:43:56
Edit : Quote

plankgatan Posts: > 500

G900 and c702 will never (ever) get the same pic quality as k850. they have a smaller(weeker) camera module
thats a fact. (no software in the world can change that). BUT the pic quality can off course become better by a more optimized cam driver.
_________________
I K850, W810 & T29
------------------------------------
http://www.flickr.com/photos/21179102@N07/
(t610, t630, k700, k750, k800, k810)

[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2008-04-18 13:08 ]
--
Posted: 2008-04-18 14:06:37
Edit : Quote

AbuBasim Posts: > 500


On 2008-04-18 14:06:37, plankgatan wrote:
G900 and c702 will never (ever) get the same pic quality as k850. they have a smaller(weeker) camera module
thats a fact.

What is your source for this? Difficult to make a weaker camera module than the one in the K850, considering the very small sensor used (1/2.8").
--
Posted: 2008-04-18 14:37:42
Edit : Quote

plankgatan Posts: > 500

i read it on some internet page couple a weeks ago, im trying to find it right now.
--
Posted: 2008-04-18 14:53:21
Edit : Quote

crossmatched Posts: > 500

let's just wait for the final commercial versions to appear. then we judge c702 and g900

both are christening models so imo they won't disappoint us.

lets not ask too much from g900. its not a cybershot handset. its focus is not mainly on imaging
--
Posted: 2008-04-18 16:52:29
Edit : Quote

AbuBasim Posts: > 500


On 2008-04-18 14:53:21, plankgatan wrote:
i read it on some internet page couple a weeks ago, im trying to find it right now.

Let us know when you find the source. If you don't then we would have to assume that you are just stating your opinion again and that you're wrong as usual . . .
--
Posted: 2008-04-18 19:18:39
Edit : Quote

razec Posts: > 500


On 2008-04-18 14:06:37, plankgatan wrote:
G900 and c702 will never (ever) get the same pic quality as k850. they have a smaller(weeker) camera module
thats a fact. (no software in the world can change that). BUT the pic quality can off course become better by a more optimized cam driver.
_________________
I K850, W810 & T29
------------------------------------
http://www.flickr.com/photos/21179102@N07/
(t610, t630, k700, k750, k800, k810)

[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2008-04-18 13:08 ]


lets put it into this: if a superslim camera phone integrated with a smaller sensor like G900/C902 will not get the same quality pictures K850 delivers, then what did Samsung Sould did over the N95?
--
Posted: 2008-04-19 15:21:20
Edit : Quote

XGlite015 Posts: 14

I think G700 produces better picture quality than G900's camera despite the lack of autofocus, the G700 has better color reproduction and sharper images(based on gsmarena and m-r G700 pic samples).
--
Posted: 2008-04-19 16:59:48
Edit : Quote

bavlondon2 Posts: > 500

SE are shit at imaging now its a fact.
--
Posted: 2008-04-19 17:09:08
Edit : Quote
Page <  123456

New Topic   Reply
Forum Index

Esato home