>
New Topic
>
Reply<
Esato Forum Index
>
Sony Ericsson / Sony >
General
> what is the best se camera phone?
Bookmark topic
and what are your "proper" settings, plankgatan?.. hope to get an answer..
--
Posted: 2008-05-17 13:34:50
Edit :
Quote
the flash on the k800 wasn't set up very well on the driver
1/2500 shutter with iso 400, it has dark background and noise now in my driver it's 1/25 iso 320 i have properly lit backgrounds and less noise.
--
Posted: 2008-05-17 18:09:46
Edit :
Quote
On 2008-05-17 13:34:50, that-guy wrote:
and what are your "proper" settings, plankgatan?.. hope to get an answer..
what i mean is i get very good pics with my k850 if i just use example: cloudy + stabilzer
k850 with its 5 megapixels gives easily best details. show me a k750 who produce this kind of details when its cloudy weather ????? no way !
or details overall
or like Lucis excellent pics
_________________
I 
K850, 
W810 & 
T29
------------------------------------
http://www.flickr.com/photos/21179102@N07/
(t610, t630, k700, k750, k800, k810)
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2008-05-17 17:47 ]
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2008-05-17 17:48 ]
--
Posted: 2008-05-17 18:32:17
Edit :
Quote
theres noise in the sky, there 5mp resized down of corse they look sharp i fought about buying a k850 i found one in the sale
http://shop.carphonewarehouse[....]ricsson/k850i-green-clearance/
i don't like it enough to spend £180 i brought my k800i for £170 but wanted it enough to pay that possibly when the prices drops again i might buy it i like it more than the new c series, until then i am more than happy to stick with my k800i.
--
Posted: 2008-05-17 18:43:13
Edit :
Quote
who gives a shit about some small noise in the sky, when k850 produce super sharp pics like this ???? if you know how to use k850 properley its the best phone easy
_________________
I
K850,
W810 &
T29
------------------------------------
http://www.flickr.com/photos/21179102@N07/
(t610, t630, k700, k750, k800, k810)
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2008-05-17 17:53 ]
--
Posted: 2008-05-17 18:50:08
Edit :
Quote
my k800 can produce sharp pics aswell this is my best shot with it
http://www.esato.com/phonepho[....]y+ericsson&model=k800i+special
--
Posted: 2008-05-17 19:03:39
Edit :
Quote
On 2008-05-17 18:50:08, plankgatan wrote:
who gives a shit about some small noise in the sky, when k850 produce super sharp pics like this ???? if you know how to use k850 properley its the best phone easy
_________________
I
K850,
W810 &
T29
------------------------------------
http://www.flickr.com/photos/21179102@N07/
(t610, t630, k700, k750, k800, k810)
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2008-05-17 17:53 ]
Dudde , i guess ur the only person in the world who knows how to get gud picz wit k850i ...
.. ! becux ur the only one who can get gud piczz wit k850 ? ... TBH , i think u edit thm wit Photoshop
...
--
Posted: 2008-05-17 20:52:36
Edit :
Quote
Am i the only one who thinks those pics are too good to come out from a K850? Or perhaps any phone cam?
--
Posted: 2008-05-17 22:43:25
Edit :
Quote
show me a k750 who produce this kind of details when its cloudy weather ????? no way !
plank, i really can understand that you're defending K850 because also in my opinion this is very good (not the best) 5mp camphone. however i don't understand how can you write things like that quoted. looks like you really don't know what K750 can do. funny thing is that you wrote about details but maybe you forget that 2mp is always far away from 5mp? nonsense
i picked up some old photos from W800. all taken in cloudy days, not enough details?
--
Posted: 2008-05-17 22:48:07
Edit :
Quote
On 2008-05-17 02:42:52, Radiux399 wrote:
On 2008-05-17 02:18:38, max_wedge wrote:
the water colour of hte K800 is a real let down - it was the only thing that really disappointed me about the K800.
K750 + MXE is definately better, and even the K750 with only it's own light is better at close range than K800. Not to mention macro. The K800 flash drowns out detail on macro shots where the K750 light is just perfect. Not only that on macro shots the K800 focus beam is so bright it reflects strongly off the subject preventing the camera from focussing properly. I've found to focus macro's I usually have to put my finger over the focus-assist beam when focussing.
My K800 flash doesn't drown out details - it actually works very very well. In my experience the K850 flash tends to overblow everything, not the K800. Still, even using the flash, the K800/K850 keeps the camera running at ISO 400, causing the noise reduction to kick into overdrive. The result? The smears or "water painting" effect that everyone describes it as.
I prefer a bit of chromatic noise in my shots which I can easily remove on my PC, rather than the camera attempting to smear that noise away so I can't see it anymore. After all, there is no way to get that detail back once its been smeared away.
I only meant about the drowning out on macro shots - because you are so close the flash is too strong for macro shots. Believe me I take a lot of macros shots, often for work (labels on routers, dialers etc that I have to get the details for service providers, usually in tight dark spaces that means I have to use macro mode and flash but the flash is too bright - whereas K750+light I never had this problem)
On normal flash, the watercolour affect is really bad, it still means blurry pics, but atleast not drowned out as bad as macros.
--
Posted: 2008-05-18 10:23:18
Edit :
Quote
New Topic
Reply
