Sony Ericsson / Sony : Software, Firmware and Drivers : is that possible ! C905 - what the hell is wrong with this camera?
>
New Topic
>
Reply<
Esato Forum Index
>
Sony Ericsson / Sony >
Software, Firmware and Drivers
> is that possible ! C905 - what the hell is wrong with this camera?
Bookmark topic
For K750-firmware is R1035
camera 4.5
Still beleive that camera (on C905) can do better job. Firmware has the problem with post process. I beleive that may be solved somehow
--
Posted: 2008-12-29 03:44:00
Edit :
Quote
Maybe just because C905 is still new
--
Posted: 2008-12-29 11:50:34
Edit :
Quote
Specifically for panonski, I still think that you should sell it and buy yourself a digital camera. Because even Renoir and INNOV8 still have noise in their pics.
--
Posted: 2008-12-29 11:51:34
Edit :
Quote
strange...
even my k800 can do better.....
is this somekind of hardware problem, coz there's one review on se-nse.
they compare the 8,1 C905 with 10mp nikon D10!!!!
and, wow, amazing!!!
c905 pic quality is close to nikon d10!!!
kill ur phone, then go to se center to get replacement....
still in warranty?
--
Posted: 2008-12-29 14:34:49
Edit :
Quote
Pfff, how dare they compare a phone to a DSLR. Even if some shots turn out to be comparable, for serious photography a DSLR will always (now and in the future, untill they know how to produce nanolenses) beat the crap out of any camphone. Who uses his DSLR for snapshots will be better of with a phonecam or compact camera.
jordyzzz, could you place a link here to that review you mentioned?
--
Posted: 2008-12-29 15:02:20
Edit :
Quote
they compare the 8,1 C905 with 10mp nikon D10!!!!
actually it was Nikon D80
c905 pic quality is close to nikon d10!!!
you must be kidding me, right? D80 wiped the floor with C905
http://blog.se-nse.net/c902-c905-nikon-d80-night-shoot-out/
--
Posted: 2008-12-29 15:34:12
Edit :
Quote
8mp on a tiny cmos sensor was never gonna work, it's the cell size on the sensor that makes the difference C702 is 2.5µm, c902 is 2.0µm , unsure what the c905 is but it's smaller than the c902's, the new 12mp exor sensor is 1.4µm, mobile should be left for quick snaps but you make quick snaps at 8mp resolution a resolution like that is for printing out posters the size of small cars, or for 50inch screens if you need 8mp resolution photos then buy a digicam. It's the noise reduction that makes the photos a smeary mess it would actually be better to have more noise & more detail like the C702 than you could pos-process them yourself.
C702 iso250 Straight from phone,
http://www.4shared.com/file/76048555/30df258/DSC00039.html
processed with neat image
http://www.4shared.com/file/7[....]251ad6d/DSC00039_filtered.html
To show how badly the c905 lacks detail heres too 100% crops,
C905 8mp autofocus
http://img369.imageshack.us/img369/2171/dsc00048dt7.jpg
nokia 6630 1.23mp fixedfocus
http://img156.imageshack.us/img156/285/18122008sm8.jpg
Just for a rough idea not a direct comparasion, other than resolution not much difference in the amount of details.
--
Posted: 2008-12-29 17:00:50
Edit :
Quote
tottaly agree. . . :) by the way, is that kind of thing possible to solve with camdrive or some other parameters. I notice very high differencies between predefinition shoot modes. Obviosly this must be in camdrive. I beleive that camera must done much better job :)
This message was posted from a C905
--
Posted: 2008-12-29 17:29:57
Edit :
Quote
Theres nothing regarding the noise reduction in the camdriver, lower iso and longer shutter speed would help a bit but even on iso 64 the c905 uses mega powerful noise reduction.
--
Posted: 2008-12-29 17:41:37
Edit :
Quote
should I warn guys from SE ?
--
Posted: 2008-12-29 21:59:13
Edit :
Quote
New Topic
Reply
