>
New Topic
>
Reply<
Esato Forum Index
>
Sony Ericsson / Sony >
General
> c902 vs N82 vs Moto ZN5 comparision
Bookmark topic
he he some people are retarded hehe they should log out immediately he he
--
Posted: 2009-04-24 12:58:52
Edit :
Quote
well, here comes one.
a tip.... dont call people retards, i got nearly banned when i said so long time ago
--
Posted: 2009-04-24 13:05:39
Edit :
Quote
Checking the Zn5 pics in the photosection & flickr , they look nothing like what your posting.
--
Posted: 2009-04-24 13:10:45
Edit :
Quote
you started comparision then be brave and accept some uncomfortable facts
some missed pictures from 'your' test
C902
http://attach.sogi.com.tw/img_park/7636/04b.jpg
Zn5
http://attach.sogi.com.tw/img_park/7636/04d.jpg
C902
http://attach.sogi.com.tw/img_park/7636/07b.jpg
Zn5
http://attach.sogi.com.tw/img_park/7636/07d.jpg
C902
http://attach.sogi.com.tw/img_park/7636/08b.jpg
Zn5
http://attach.sogi.com.tw/img_park/7636/08d.jpg
another set
http://www.mobilport.hu/?r=15943&p=1[ This Message was edited by: Raiderski on 2009-04-24 12:16 ]
--
Posted: 2009-04-24 13:11:45
Edit :
Quote
2 issues from Zn5
- looks like it cannot handle proper exposure when use xenon
- sometimes auto exposure cannot find proper value and pictures are a bit too dark
[ This Message was edited by: Raiderski on 2009-04-24 12:36 ]
--
Posted: 2009-04-24 13:19:32
Edit :
Quote
raederski, i said (clearly) that it was easier if you went in yourself and look at all pics.....(hard to upload 15 x 3 pics
)
i thought it would be quite unnecessary to upload 8 outdoor pics and thats it (you follow me
)
it gives hardly some true result about a camera if you just upload daylight pics, or am i wrong
so of course i tried to upload..indoor, macro, night, landscape, outdoor...so much who was possible)...
and yeh, ZN5 have GREAT daylight quality
but in this test, with different light condition, there came N82 and c902 out on top
--
Posted: 2009-04-24 13:22:14
Edit :
Quote
sure thing, that's why instead of pics I prefer to post links
--
Posted: 2009-04-24 13:23:20
Edit :
Quote
On 2009-04-24 12:57:21, plankgatan wrote:
number1. IM NOT saying c902 have better full size quality, BUT SERIOUSLY, WHO GIVES A SHIT HOW A CELLPHONE LOOKS IN (2592 x 1944) ??? i care how it looks in 800 x 600 or 1024 x 768...or do you print out your cellphone pics in A1 size ???? he he
As i said before 50inch screens do exist and maybe 1 day you would like to print a small sized poster, it would be nice to have the fullsized quality to do so otherwise whats the point in 5mp???, if you do just view your pics in 800 x 600 or 1024 x 768 , then why do you have a 5mp camphone and go around everywhere saying what fantasic quality it has??? , a 5mp pic resized all the way down to 800 x 600 or 1024 x 768 will always have great quality no matter what device took it.
--
Posted: 2009-04-24 13:47:43
Edit :
Quote
OMG plank.
One conclusion.
Are you brainwashed?
))
The ZN5 is a good point and shoot.
Go back and compare the camera launch times, saving picture times, shutter speed\lag, autofocus speed, and why not its speed in gallery where you can see the quality IPU that is used in the unit.
Based on which of the above mentioned algorithms you decided that the C902 is a better POINT and SHOOT?
Never mind the camera quality because here is clear that C902 has no chance (purple fringe baby, yeaaah)
)
I have a ZN5 for 4 months now and i can say that i'm happy with it apart from the OS which sucks at user friendliness when compared to the SE's OS.
[ This Message was edited by: alexander87 on 2009-04-24 13:05 ]
--
Posted: 2009-04-24 14:01:53
Edit :
Quote
why are some people gratefully biased at comparison.
--
Posted: 2009-04-24 15:19:50
Edit :
Quote
New Topic
Reply
