>
New Topic
>
Reply<
Esato Forum Index
>
Manufacturer Discussion >
Nokia
> Nokia 808 PureView Thread And Discussion
Bookmark topic
I had to take some pics of a bank property today, and for some reason they wanted a date stamp on the pics..
so I had to borrow my friends Canon SD1200 is to do that.. the 808 doesn't have that option.
So I took the opportunity to compare the two.. I am very pleasantly surprised by the Canon. It is a $250 camera.. with very good reviews
http://www.amazon.com/Canon-S[....]3677&sr=8-1&keywords=sd1200+is
But I expected much worse.
The 808 of course renders such devices absolutely useless (unless you need a date stamp.. lol) and once again.. it shows that Nokia really did something very special here. The lens on the 808 is much wider... and still sharper toward the edges of the frame. Carl Zeiss deserves a standing ovation for that one..
The most amazing part was the flash test I did in the garage.. considering that the Conon has a more powerful flash, the 808 still managed to get more detail and less noise out of the jpeg.. its incredible. Also.. better white balance and color reproduction.
808
sd1200is
here are the rest of the pics in full res
http://sdrv.ms/XHteAL[ This Message was edited by: cu015170 on 2013-02-05 03:25 ]
--
Posted: 2013-02-05 04:17:23
Edit :
Quote
http://www.gsmarena.com/nokia[....]gapixel_sensor__-news-5483.php
But why only the US??
--
Posted: 2013-02-05 20:18:35
Edit :
Quote
Sometimes i'm a bit disappointed of the colors reproduction of the 808...sometimes a bit washed out . Of course if you watch the pics in real size you'll find better details with the 808. i'm not trying to prove that the gs3 have a better cam but that the 808 is sometimes a bit dull in some landscapes what do you thing ?
808
GS3
--
Posted: 2013-02-05 21:40:53
Edit :
Quote
I have previously said that before the colours can be pale in many shots I've seen
--
Posted: 2013-02-05 22:04:00
Edit :
Quote
The GS III's looks more vibrant
--
Posted: 2013-02-05 22:35:21
Edit :
Quote
It does strangely
--
Posted: 2013-02-05 23:09:00
Edit :
Quote
Nothing strange about it.. most OEMs saturate their jpegs to cover up the lack of detail and the aggressive noise reduction algorithms. It looks better at first sight, and on a smaller screen..
Since both, the N8 and the 808 have bigger sensor, the jpeg processing can be left more neutral..
On the 808, as I've shown numerous times, its very easy to get vibrant/saturated colors. Custom mode > vivid color > saturation maxed out:
If you know how to use it, the 808 can do whatever your hart desires.. expect bjs of course..
Did couple of DR tests today.. not bad
[ This Message was edited by: cu015170 on 2013-02-06 01:24 ]
--
Posted: 2013-02-06 02:20:20
Edit :
Quote
Nice is that your house??
--
Posted: 2013-02-06 02:34:00
Edit :
Quote
No contest
One
808
One
808
100% crop
808
http://imgur.com/a/dbzm6
One
http://imgur.com/a/eBmOk
808
One
[ This Message was edited by: cu015170 on 2013-03-13 02:34 ]
--
Posted: 2013-03-13 03:34:17
Edit :
Quote
emerson_shei Posts: > 500
No surprises, 808 is infinitely superior!
Note: One has a good camera, better than Xperia Z and any other Htc!
--
Posted: 2013-03-13 05:40:40
Edit :
Quote
New Topic
Reply
