>
New Topic
>
Topic Locked
Esato Forum Index
>
General discussions >
Rumours
> Sony Xperia Rumours 2018
Bookmark topic
OIS aren't good in phone. Look at some footage recorded from Samsung/LG. The space are strange. I don't know how to describe it. So, sony now go for high ISO. I don't think we can see any OIS in the near future. I heard there is something to do with the EIS and the DVS but I don't really know it is true or not.
Curve back is not space-efficient. I feel that the FPS position maybe is the part of the design. So, try to accept it.
--
Posted: 2018-08-01 20:49:18
Edit :
Quote
Sony may have made some stupid decisions, but not adding battery in the curve is not one of them.
The purpose of the curve just for ergonomics, nothing more. It is also thick only at the midpoint.
It is a fact.
We must not forget what happened Note 7, precisely because of the curve
--
Posted: 2018-08-01 21:41:47
Edit :
Quote
Removing headphone jack is not even a trend, its pathetic from phone manufacturers including sony.
The old design would have helped in accommodating better battery.
Ambient flow looks and feela great but it is not the way forward.
Why isn't sony trying out the y design for gods sake
--
Posted: 2018-08-01 21:50:23
Edit :
Quote
How is G7 better than XZ2?
Gsmarena on G7 review says the samples taken are worse than G6/V30. XZ1 is much better.
Battery life on LG phones are lame since G3, only X Power can be saved.
Screen is not BT2020 certified, it has worse delta values, no sdr to hdr conversion.
G7 has mono speaker. DAC makes no difference for wireless headset.
It has been shipped without EIS for
4K@30fps
Videos have lower bitrate than XZ.
It has better design ( when notch is hidden)
[ This Message was edited by: Moe87 on 2018-08-01 23:21 ]
--
Posted: 2018-08-01 21:59:08
Edit :
Quote
The DAC on LG G7/V30 is the best for the smartphone. Exclude the granbeat since it's not using flagship grade SoC.
The audio quality from the quad DAC is much better than any wireless headset with LDAC. The MDR-1000X is not so good for the audio quality.
I still curiuous for the EIS and OIS stuff. Could not we have both on the same phone ? Like OIS work for still picture and EIS for video.
--
Posted: 2018-08-02 00:36:47
Edit :
Quote
I saw that someone quoted Zackbuks about Sony Mobile camera team has joined the main Sony camera team since the XZ2 launched. Hope it's real and looking forward to it.
--
Posted: 2018-08-02 01:47:42
Edit :
Quote
OIS on smartphones cannot be used just when you want.
It acts everytime you use the camera.
It also increases the battery usage.
Question is: why doesn't EIS work for photos?
I heard Premium has some anti-shaking thing, I dont know exactly what it is.
There are just 2 problems with current cam:
- the fact software goes LANDSCAPE in situations the BACKLIT would be better.
- slower shutter in daylight compared to previous generations. Scene gets brighter like phones with f1.7/f1.8 but sky is completely overexposed.
Strong points :
- White balance is pretty great
- No strong NR, noise can be erased by edition. Better than losing details.
- HDR does not make photo fake like other phones that provide more contrast/saturation than reality.
- Less corner softness than XZP
XZ2P cam review from AH the guy says the DISTORTION CORRECTION tool helps the video quality.
I did not know that..
I think dxo already did xz2, but waiting the Premium to post together.
Maybe xz2 is above 100. OP6 got 97 without zoom or telephoto.
[ This Message was edited by: Moe87 on 2018-08-02 01:10 ]
--
Posted: 2018-08-02 02:08:03
Edit :
Quote
On 2018-08-01 20:49:18, skyXperia wrote:
OIS aren't good in phone
You are wrong there. As I said don't be blind fanboys. You will keep feeling oled and ois inferior just because sony hasn't used them in phones yet. Everyone else has and the results are great.
--
Posted: 2018-08-02 02:35:33
Edit :
Quote
On 2018-08-02 02:35:33, hgautam wrote:
On 2018-08-01 20:49:18, skyXperia wrote:
OIS aren't good in phone
You are wrong there. As I said don't be blind fanboys. You will keep feeling oled and ois inferior just because sony hasn't used them in phones yet. Everyone else has and the results are great.
Evey technology has its benifits and draw backs, you cannot say one is better than the other. All screens, no matter oled or tft can be tuned and adjusted as the oem like them to be, so technically, they can reproduce over saturated colours or natural colours as they like. Yes, Oled has great blacks, but at the same time has burn in. The only phone which is considered having a good oled screen is the iPhone x, which has a much longer lifespan than any galaxies.
OIS is only useful in the dark when the subject is stationary. If you are shooting a moving subject, OIS is basically useless. Although they did not solve the problem of night photos OIS, they solve the problem with another way, so to me, they have succeed, but a bit late.
--
Posted: 2018-08-02 03:16:23
Edit :
Quote
On 2018-08-02 02:35:33, hgautam wrote:
On 2018-08-01 20:49:18, skyXperia wrote:
OIS aren't good in phone
You are wrong there. As I said don't be blind fanboys. You will keep feeling oled and ois inferior just because sony hasn't used them in phones yet. Everyone else has and the results are great.
I am not blind. Look at some video footage recorded on S9. The footage look weird when walking. It is not smooth. Seems like some people pulling the screen. I don't only look on SONY phone. I read various review on all phone. Let face it. OIS is good for photo, EIS is good for Video. If they can make the OIS similar to OSS, can be switched on/off. Than will be good.
I know Xperia will use OLED display very near future. I am find with that. I don't like the curved screen through.
--
Posted: 2018-08-02 03:50:33
Edit :
Quote
New Topic
Topic Locked
