Sony Ericsson / Sony : General : 5 megapixel Sony Ericsson K850 Cyber-shot phone announced
>
New Topic
>
Reply<
Esato Forum Index
>
Sony Ericsson / Sony >
General
> 5 megapixel Sony Ericsson K850 Cyber-shot phone announced
Bookmark topic
On 2007-06-17 21:46:48, Solos wrote:
Too bad that SE K850i won't have Bluetooth 2.1, only 2.0. But I think I'll buy it if the price is ok
No wonder since 2.1. ws released just 2 month ago.
--
Posted: 2007-06-18 00:37:10
Edit :
Quote
but please, are you guys for real.
its many "sport" digital cameras who have "glass" in front of the lens (even with optical zoom). my father have this one, works perfect.
( i tested one thing with my k810i just some minutes ago. i pressed my finger on the lens several times, then i took a pic, after that i wiped the prints off and took a new pic, guess what, the pics looks exactley the same on the computer.....straaaaaange !!!!! maybe Sonyericsson and all other big camera brands have right.
_________________
k810i
w810i
T39
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2007-06-17 23:48 ]
--
Posted: 2007-06-18 00:40:18
Edit :
Quote
Well, maybe that glass is scratch resistant, but it cannot be resistant to fingerprints, dust etc. Camera in a phone is great when you need to take a picture quickly, because your phone is always in your pocket. But with K850 you will have to clean this glass cover first, so where's the advantage?
And that mentioned camera with a glass lens cover... It's not such a problem, because usually you have it in some kind of protective case, not straight in your pocket like a phone.
--
Posted: 2007-06-18 01:09:31
Edit :
Quote
That is a water proof camera, a totally different concept since the lens is meant to seal inner mechanics. Is Sofia water proof too?!
--
Posted: 2007-06-18 01:21:02
Edit :
Quote
plankgatan:
i tested one thing with my k810i just some minutes ago. i pressed my finger on the lens several times, then i took a pic, after that i wiped the prints off and took a new pic, guess what, the pics looks exactley the same on the computer.....straaaaaange !!!!! maybe Sonyericsson and all other big camera brands have right.
Try taking in sunlight with finger prints/dirt on the lens and you will see the difference.
Anyway, any rational mind would see that having the lens cover behind the glass doesnt make sense (as it serve no purpose whatsover in protecting the lens) . Unless the "lens cover" is actually the camera shutter. And btw, glass DO scratch no matter how scratch resistant it is.
--
Posted: 2007-06-18 04:14:47
Edit :
Quote
WHY ARE YOU COMPLAINING ABOUT THE GLASS?
what the f**k, you guys are a buncha idiots, would you rather the shutter in front, so you could complain that it will break too easily? or would you rather no glass so that the shurtter can break in you pocket and have you sensor open all the time? would you like to have NO CAMERA?
do you see how sleek the back of the phone is? how flush it is, even the logo is behind the layer covering the back of the phone.
if a) the only thing you have to complain about is SCRATCH RESISTANT GLASS in front of the lens cover your reaching, and then when you get the phone you can take it off. id rather have the option with, than without.
b) fingerprints, stop eating fried foods, and use a napkin, 2nd how often do you grease up your digicam? do you spend your day getting as much finger smuge in the crevices of devices where it becomes a problem?
get outta here with this nonsense if you have nothing to add about the phone other than bitching about a nice peice of glass then go buy a N95 and have a blast with a slow ass OS where you spend half the battery life waiting for the phone to do something. yea sooooooo much better.
the, phone is ugly w.e but ill get it. shit has the features to throw down with everything else out there today. the w960 i may have to get as well just to f**k with the iphone kids
KEEP THE GLASS, just get those call/hang up buttons the same color as the numerical buttons
--
Posted: 2007-06-18 04:56:32
Edit :
Quote
On 2007-06-18 00:37:10, Arne Anka wrote:
On 2007-06-17 21:46:48, Solos wrote:
Too bad that SE K850i won't have Bluetooth 2.1, only 2.0. But I think I'll buy it if the price is ok
No wonder since 2.1. ws released just 2 month ago.
Yes, it was released to the world 2 months ago, but I'm prette sure that SE new about it earlier. They could just put the proper chip to the phone, and add Bluetooth 2.1 functionality in one of software updates if they don't have time to work on it now. As You know - 6 months is quite a long time in electronics.
--
Posted: 2007-06-18 06:14:05
Edit :
Quote
On 2007-06-18 06:14:05, Solos wrote:
On 2007-06-18 00:37:10, Arne Anka wrote:
On 2007-06-17 21:46:48, Solos wrote:
Too bad that SE K850i won't have Bluetooth 2.1, only 2.0. But I think I'll buy it if the price is ok
No wonder since 2.1. ws released just 2 month ago.
Yes, it was released to the world 2 months ago, but I'm prette sure that SE new about it earlier. They could just put the proper chip to the phone, and add Bluetooth 2.1 functionality in one of software updates if they don't have time to work on it now. As You know - 6 months is quite a long time in electronics.
Of course they knew about it. But it won't become commercial till later this year. Around the end of the year, if I'm not mistaking.
--
Posted: 2007-06-18 07:38:29
Edit :
Quote
@ my ninja
Couldn't agree any more my friend, although I'm sure you will change your mind about the asthetics once you get it in your hand.
Fingerprints are pretty much a non-issue when it takes one second to wipe the lens, are you guys seriously worried about fingerprints on the glass?
--
Posted: 2007-06-18 10:53:01
Edit :
Quote
On 2007-06-18 04:56:32, my ninja wrote:
WHY ARE YOU COMPLAINING ABOUT THE GLASS?
what the f**k, you guys are a buncha idiots, would you rather the shutter in front, so you could complain that it will break too easily?
KEEP THE GLASS, just get those call/hang up buttons the same color as the numerical buttons
well said. (maybe they understand soon , he he)
--
Posted: 2007-06-18 10:57:00
Edit :
Quote
New Topic
Reply
