Esato Mobile
Sony Ericsson / Sony : Software, Firmware and Drivers : Super camera driver for k750/w800/w810
> New Topic
> Reply
< Esato Forum Index > Sony Ericsson / Sony > Software, Firmware and Drivers > Super camera driver for k750/w800/w810 Bookmark topic
Page <  123 ... 534535536 ... 996997998>

the_wog29 Posts: 1

@ amarsidhu,

what settings did you use to take those photos of the garden at night?

thanks,
--
Posted: 2007-08-09 09:58:52
Edit : Quote

stingjoel Posts: 265


On 2007-08-09 09:22:52, DarKMaGiCiaN wrote:
@Raiderski
your driver is tested with two comment

1. focus
when you want to take a shot of something with auto focus ( in manual it needs between 1.1-2 )
the auto focus faild and range it to about (2.2-4)

2. color of the pic is little yellowish
check the pic and you'll know what I mean ^_^

compairing with DarKMaGiCiaN 0.91 with some modification (lpachuong)

^_^


_________________
Ericsson T29s>Ericsson R320>Ericsson T68 >Sony Ericsson T300>Sony Ericsson J300i>Sony Ericsson K750i>Sony Ericsson M600
...... waitting for new S type

[ This Message was edited by: darkmagician on 2007-08-09 08:37 ]


@DarKMaGiCiaN,

Raiderski's camdriver more sharper than DarKMaGiCiaN 0.91 with some modification....I can read word "UNO" in raiderski picture but not in yours.
Take a look at picture #2...at the earphone...lokk at the two holes, raiderski's picture is more sharper!

--
Posted: 2007-08-09 10:16:24
Edit : Quote

DarKMaGiCiaN Posts: > 500

@stingjoel
thanks for the comment I'll try to compair more because I think these two pic were macro shots so it is hard to compair the sharpness


any way I didnt upload the comparison because I want to compair Raiderski driver with mine

I just uploaded it because Raiderski asked for comments and I did it with pics
( as I'm using my cameradiver so this is the only way I can clear what I want to say )

^_^



[ This Message was edited by: DarKMaGiCiaN on 2007-08-09 09:31 ]
--
Posted: 2007-08-09 10:30:16
Edit : Quote

Raiderski Posts: > 500

terminator17
i will never combine functions in this way. fine mode should be fine mode and nothing more. in my driver:
- spot can be enabled separately [EV +1.0, zoom 1.1]
- EM can be enabled separately [EV +0.7, zoom 1.1]
- EM can be default available in normal quality when EM_ON_NORMAL_QUALITY parameter is 01

so, why should i combine functions? about normal and fine mode... you are too much accustomed with no-supermode solutions in 6.x normal and fine is just normal and fine, nothing more

DarKMaGiCiaN
1. do you mean close shots in normal (no-macro) mode? in this situation macro range scan (~40cm) is not available, i've explained this already but i can repeat if someone wish

2. yes but when you use CC (color correction) you forget about one important (in my opinion) thing. to remove yellow (warm) CC will balance to more blue (cold) color and this good if you always have light conditions which has more yellow. what if light conditions will be cold, for example cloudy/winter day? in this situation almost no yellow is avalable and additional CC will add more blue :/ as you can see i don't like CC at all because it isn't universal for all light conditions. my way to resolve white balance and other scene properties is in "self defined profiles". in 6.5 T3 user can modify yellow/blue and green/magenta balance, i shouldn't burden him with additional CC on which he has no influence

cheers
_________________
W800 CID36 R1BD001
www.flickr.com/photos/8469432@N06/

[ This Message was edited by: Raiderski on 2007-08-09 09:32 ]
--
Posted: 2007-08-09 10:31:49
Edit : Quote

terminator17 Posts: 155

@raiderski
i was saying that in other point of view like if some one else use my fone ,i dont need to tell them every time that go ev 0.7 n zoom 1.1
hope u understand what i am saying
4r spot
sry my mind was smwr else..i was asking about ISO ..and whats it exactly different from exposure and all??
--
Posted: 2007-08-09 11:01:08
Edit : Quote

DarKMaGiCiaN Posts: > 500


On 2007-08-09 10:31:49, Raiderski wrote:

DarKMaGiCiaN
1. do you mean close shots in normal (no-macro) mode? in this situation macro range scan (~40cm) is not available, i've explained this already but i can repeat if someone wish

2. yes but when you use CC (color correction) you forget about one important (in my opinion) thing. to remove yellow (warm) CC will balance to more blue (cold) color and this good if you always have light conditions which has more yellow. what if light conditions will be cold, for example cloudy/winter day? in this situation almost no yellow is avalable and additional CC will add more blue :/ as you can see i don't like CC at all because it isn't universal for all light conditions. my way to resolve white balance and other scene properties is in "self defined profiles". in 6.5 T3 user can modify yellow/blue and green/magenta balance, i shouldn't burden him with additional CC on which he has no influence

cheers



1.check the pic ( it is with auto focus )

I tried to change the focus point and still same result


2. no comment because you are right ( Now it is clear for me ) ^_^

thanks
Raiderski
--
Posted: 2007-08-09 11:06:49
Edit : Quote

ebird Posts: 4

@Raiderski

I tested your 6.5 TEST 3 and it makes real good pictures but I have two suggestions for next one...

1. could you add JPEG Quality Parameters for each normal and fine mode to your driver and

2. could you change Zoom EV to -0.3 so that its not between the White Balances...

The rest is just perfect for me!!
Btw the "cloudy landscape" profile works great!!


Another cool feature maybe would be...
Auto JPEG Compression like in BLKSnaker's driver and then switching supermode on/off by changing fine/normal quality...

[ This Message was edited by: ebird on 2007-08-09 10:52 ]
--
Posted: 2007-08-09 11:29:24
Edit : Quote

whatsucka Posts: > 500

@Raiderski

i was juz wondering can da zoom b at 16x like chengrongs driver?
is the default settin in camdriver.dat for 15 fps video recording?
--
Posted: 2007-08-09 11:47:13
Edit : Quote

terminator17 Posts: 155

no need of 16x zoom
quality wont be that good.
but yeah raiderski try improving the quality of zoom @4x
i think BLKsnaker's zoom and sarmad(not sure) zoom pics are of better quality
--
Posted: 2007-08-09 12:04:11
Edit : Quote

Raiderski Posts: > 500

terminator17
don't share with your phone - particularly if this is your girlfriend or wife and now seriously... i agree with your point of view. if you want EM without any EV/zoom changes then you can enable it as standard in "normal quality" (look at EM_ON_NORMAL_QUALITY description in readme.txt)

when you set low EV compensation (exposure) and above average shutter speed then ISO will be low. i almost always use this combination when light conditions are bad, sometimes i'm lazy and prefer EM/ENM which also gives great result. ISO control in 6.5 TEST4? maybe...

DarKMaGiCiaN
this kind of effect is possible only in 2 situations:
1. no autofocus but manual focus (~3.0) is used
2. macro mode is enabled
when macro mode is enabled then macro range scan is only used because it's faster than full range scan (it's useless in close shots)

ebird
1. nope, now i have highest stable (i hope so) quality settings and i don't want any other modifications in this matter
2. you can do this yourself, this is very easy open code in notepad and search for "EV_M_10=". this will be in big -CUSTOMIZE- block which you can reorganize as you wish for your own preferences.

EV_sign_value, where:

sign = M for minus or P for plus
value = EV value without dot (10 = 1.0)

--
Posted: 2007-08-09 12:06:31
Edit : Quote
Page <  123 ... 534535536 ... 996997998>

New Topic   Reply
Forum Index

Esato home