>
New Topic
>
Reply<
Esato Forum Index
>
Sony Ericsson / Sony >
Android
> Sony Ericsson X10 Official Thread
Bookmark topic
Очень понравилось качество экрана, уровень яркости. За счет такого разрешения картинка смотрится гладкой, нет никаких претензий. Очень хорошо прорисованы иконки, другие элементы, шрифты, интерфейс выглядит аккуратным, красивым. Над экраном находится датчик освещенности, фронтальная камера для видеофонии и датчик приближения.
"The quality of the screen, level of brightness is very good. Because of the high resolution pictures are looking clean/smooth, can't object to sth. The Icons are drawn sharp, other elements, fonts and interface are looking accurate, cute. Above the screen are: light sensor [hehe, yesss!], front cam and proximity sensor [what's that for??]"
--
Posted: 2009-11-10 20:45:10
Edit :
Quote
On 2009-11-10 20:45:10, untitled1 wrote:
Очень понравилось качество экрана, уровень яркости. За счет такого разрешения картинка смотрится гладкой, нет никаких претензий. Очень хорошо прорисованы иконки, другие элементы, шрифты, интерфейс выглядит аккуратным, красивым. Над экраном находится датчик освещенности, фронтальная камера для видеофонии и датчик приближения.
"The quality of the screen, level of brightness is very good. Because of the high resolution pictures are looking clean/smooth, can't object to sth. The Icons are drawn sharp, other elements, fonts and interface are looking accurate, cute. Above the screen are: light sensor [hehe, yesss!], front cam and proximity sensor [what's that for??]"
Sounds very good, and the proximity sensor is for dimming the screen during calls...
--
Posted: 2009-11-10 21:25:08
Edit :
Quote
On 2009-11-10 21:25:08, Ravager wrote:
On 2009-11-10 20:45:10, untitled1 wrote:
Очень понравилось качество экрана, уровень яркости. За счет такого разрешения картинка смотрится гладкой, нет никаких претензий. Очень хорошо прорисованы иконки, другие элементы, шрифты, интерфейс выглядит аккуратным, красивым. Над экраном находится датчик освещенности, фронтальная камера для видеофонии и датчик приближения.
"The quality of the screen, level of brightness is very good. Because of the high resolution pictures are looking clean/smooth, can't object to sth. The Icons are drawn sharp, other elements, fonts and interface are looking accurate, cute. Above the screen are: light sensor [hehe, yesss!], front cam and proximity sensor [what's that for??]"
Sounds very good, and the proximity sensor is for dimming the screen during calls...
cool! and when putting the x10 in a case or pocket!i think some nokias and blackberrys have such a feature...
Someone asked about sound quality before, he writes, that sound is really good the speaker has good quality and is a little bit more quiet than the n97 but it doesn't overmodulate.
He also writes that the phone or esp. the UI has lots of features that are not apperent but very usefull and nice. It's not a naked android system! and u can reinstall or turn every feature off or uninstall it not like on the motorola or samsung etc.
i love this phone more and more with each new detail about it
--
Posted: 2009-11-10 21:47:26
Edit :
Quote
I think both reviews take to broad daylight some good features of the phone without mentioning hardware specs that are impressive by itself, although I'm sick of hearing how every phone compares to iPhone.
Also I didn't notice any complaints about the screen either although most of this topic covers nothing but the screen issues.
--
Posted: 2009-11-10 21:57:02
Edit :
Quote
On 2009-11-10 21:57:02, volume100 wrote:
I think both reviews take to broad daylight some good features of the phone without mentioning hardware specs that are impressive by itself, although I'm sick of hearing how every phone compares to iPhone.
Also I didn't notice any complaints about the screen either although most of this topic covers nothing but the screen issues.
Of course the screen is going to be good, Sony Ericsson got one chance left, would they really choose a bad screen? If this phone becomes a flop, the company is history, theoretically at least.
What if we have only seen prototypes of different screens and that's why they have different specs everywhere, not even the managers know the final product?
[ This Message was edited by: Ravager on 2009-11-10 21:12 ]
--
Posted: 2009-11-10 22:11:25
Edit :
Quote
Totally exposed camera lenses... | no metal(alluminum) parts at all... | back to single led flash.. 
and the colors are vivid?Are they blind or sth ??
The good resolution is the only + in this screen... for a 2010 1.6 Android phone.
Yeah...great review...they dont' even know the total memory support ....
Still waitin for a better review and videos of the 65k/no multitouch screen..
as i confiormed .. some days before
[ This Message was edited by: sealover94 on 2009-11-10 22:11 ]
--
Posted: 2009-11-10 23:09:32
Edit :
Quote
so hmm, who should i listen to, the one who speculate over bad photos or the guy who have held it in reel life? hmm...
And what i've heard it will have multitouch after the update to Android 2.0, and also with that release they will not have the limitations of the screen by the software. Therefore my theory is that they are going to have a better screen then the os can handle "limited to 65k" but after the upgrade we will see the real beauty.
--
Posted: 2009-11-10 23:21:54
Edit :
Quote
seal, you are really annoying: look on all of the screenshots and then think about "transparency" and "effects" the cards and the pictures on it are transparent and brighter consciously, maybe to demonstrate the power of OpenGL. If the display would really so bad as you try to show it with your ignorance and/or arrogance since thousands of your threads, the guy would write it. He also tells about other disadvantages of the phone and hopes that they become better in the final release, so why he doesn't mention the display and says:
"The quality of the screen, level of brightness is very good. Because of the high resolution pictures are looking clean/smooth, can't object to sth. The Icons are drawn sharp, other elements, fonts and interface are looking accurate, cute. Above the screen are: light sensor, front cam and proximity sensor"
you maybe know greek better than my english, but my native language is russian, and till now the guy has one of the best reviews, if not the best. if a good review in your eyes is when the tester says "the screen is terrible", ... lol.
so please stop this rubbish-posts, with no real content. efkaristo poli. [had ancient greek @school years ago]
--
Posted: 2009-11-10 23:39:50
Edit :
Quote
On 2009-11-10 23:21:54, Ravager wrote:
so hmm, who should i listen to, the one who speculate over bad photos or the guy who have held it in reel life? hmm...
And what i've heard it will have multitouch after the update to Android 2.0, and also with that release they will not have the limitations of the screen by the software. Therefore my theory is that they are going to have a better screen then the os can handle "limited to 65k" but after the upgrade we will see the real beauty.
You should listen to a better review from well-known and reliable websites such as gsm-arena and watch videos-photos with your own eyes.. These russian guys don't even know what's the memory support of the phone... why you would trust them ?
As for the rest of your post... well i really hope that YOU ARE RIGHT and have a retail package that includes a multitouch screen with 16M colors and adroid 2.0 . Then i will buy it too
On 2009-11-10 23:39:50, untitled1 wrote:
seal, you are really annoying: look on all of the screenshots and then think about "transparency" and "effects" the cards and the pictures on it are transparent and brighter consciously, maybe to demonstrate the power of OpenGL. If the display would really so bad as you try to show it with your ignorance and/or arrogance since thousands of your threads, the guy would write it. He also tells about other disadvantages of the phone and hopes that they become better in the final release, so why he doesn't mention the display and says:
"The quality of the screen, level of brightness is very good. Because of the high resolution pictures are looking clean/smooth, can't object to sth. The Icons are drawn sharp, other elements, fonts and interface are looking accurate, cute. Above the screen are: light sensor, front cam and proximity sensor"
you maybe know greek better than my english, but my native language is russian, and till now the guy has one of the best reviews, if not the best. if a good review in your eyes is when the tester says "the screen is terrible", ... lol.
so please stop this rubbish-posts, with no real content. efkaristo poli. [had ancient greek @school years ago]
The screen is clear ! YES i can see that and know that cause of the VERY GOOD RESOLUTION...
Your best review says : 32 gb support and 16gb in package which is WRONG...... so pleeeeaaaaase !!!
If you want to dream your perfect phone... well nothing stops you...
Even the N97 comparison is 16M colors and 32gb internal .... so pleeeaaase again !!
But i don't blame you!I blame the stupid marketing team of SE...
[ This Message was edited by: sealover94 on 2009-11-10 22:46 ]
--
Posted: 2009-11-10 23:46:16
Edit :
Quote
Give it a break now Seal!
We can only pray that Sony Ericsson end up making the right decision about the screen issue.
I know I have been ranting about the same stuff but absolutely nothing will help repeating it all over again.
You sound like a malfunction record now.
I do however appreciate you keep posting new photos of the X10 so keep it up
[ This Message was edited by: McKinley on 2009-11-10 22:48 ]
--
Posted: 2009-11-10 23:48:09
Edit :
Quote
New Topic
Reply
