Esato Mobile
Sony Ericsson / Sony : Android : Xperia arc discussion Thread
> New Topic
> Reply
< Esato Forum Index > Sony Ericsson / Sony > Android > Xperia arc discussion Thread Bookmark topic
Page <  123 ... 545556 ... 392393394>

dibdin Posts: > 500

Shame the C905 failed in other areas.
--
Posted: 2011-01-23 14:12:46
Edit : Quote

rog Posts: 371


On 2011-01-23 09:43:21, boy.in.PINK wrote:

@Toney_Ericsson (or should I say Toney_HTC, thanks Sean!), yeah, that's shit! but hey, maybe the photographer didn't take the picture well. and yes, there's room for improvement. after all, it has not yet released.



A couple of words from the photographer: this picture was taken at 7.30am in the beginning of January in Zurich (what I want to say: it was night still!) There was close to zero natural light. Considering this (plus the fact that I took this picture one-handed ) I think arc does not too bad... The pre-release version of arc, as already mentioned before.
--
Posted: 2011-01-23 15:55:01
Edit : Quote

apolloa Posts: > 500


On 2011-01-23 11:40:01, marcink wrote:
C'MON, does anybody really believe that SE will manufacture anything close to N8 in photo quality? Not in 2011. Exmor-R means nothing, if you keep reducing sensor size to ridicuosly small levels. Ans Sony does just that. Their 16.4mp has got even smaller cells than 8mp. 16.4mp photos in future cam. flagship will be ok only in good light conditions and for strobe shots with iso up to 200.


But the Arc DOES have a backlit sensor? It's also 8.1 mpx and not 16?? And Canon's new HD range of camera's top out at 10mpx yet they will easily totally destroy the N8 on image quality. What's your point? Mpx mean nothing now.
So the Arc has a backlit sensor with big cells and good processing, my iPhone 4 also has a backlit sensor and it takes crap photos in low light, really really really poor.

As for the video example, well when I can see it in it's raw format on a TV etc then I shall believe it, not when it's of You Tube with it's famous image compression and quality destruction codecs........
[ This Message was edited by: apolloa on 2011-01-23 14:59 ]

--
Posted: 2011-01-23 15:58:04
Edit : Quote

boy.in.PINK Posts: > 500


On 2011-01-23 15:55:01, rog wrote:

On 2011-01-23 09:43:21, boy.in.PINK wrote:

@Toney_Ericsson (or should I say Toney_HTC, thanks Sean!), yeah, that's shit! but hey, maybe the photographer didn't take the picture well. and yes, there's room for improvement. after all, it has not yet released.



A couple of words from the photographer: this picture was taken at 7.30am in the beginning of January in Zurich (what I want to say: it was night still!) There was close to zero natural light. Considering this (plus the fact that I took this picture one-handed ) I think arc does not too bad... The pre-release version of arc, as already mentioned before.



Sorry if I had offended you in any way. Anyhow, I'm totally agree on what you stated.

I'm just hoping that the f/2.4 helps the arc for taking at least good night shots.
--
Posted: 2011-01-23 16:10:50
Edit : Quote

rog Posts: 371


On 2011-01-23 16:10:50, boy.in.PINK wrote:
Sorry if I had offended you in any way. Anyhow, I'm totally agree on what you stated.


No worries, I didn't feel offended
--
Posted: 2011-01-23 16:16:55
Edit : Quote

xenia Posts: 363

http://www.flickr.com/photos/[....]16201/in/photostream/lightbox/
ISO 1250!!! without flash. I think it is very good resault. Look at other photos good color, good details.
--
Posted: 2011-01-23 16:35:32
Edit : Quote

rickster2kuk Posts: > 500

Those photos are much better colour wise. Arc's sensor is definitely sharper (slightly nosier as well - but that might be tweaked on the final release).

Not too much different from the X10, but I think the edges of on the Arc are more in focus than the X10 so on that basis the Arc's camera based on those photos is marginally better than the X10.
--
Posted: 2011-01-23 17:06:32
Edit : Quote

admad Posts: > 500


On 2011-01-23 16:35:32, xenia wrote:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/[....]16201/in/photostream/lightbox/
ISO 1250!!! without flash. I think it is very good resault. Look at other photos good color, good details.


Now this is brilliant! Just as expected from a good phone, shutter speed value 1/40! It's what pisses me in X10, it automaticly goes to 100/200 ISO at the cost of shutter speed going at about 1/10, my hand ain't that steady, so all the indoor shots go out wrong... Only sport mode helps, but then it's too much noise/shutter speed.

This picutre is super steady, sharp, and ISO ain't that bad.
--
Posted: 2011-01-23 18:04:10
Edit : Quote

solidkevin Posts: 27

Anyone think this will come to ATT on the US? I really want this phone! OR at least a 3G version?
--
Posted: 2011-01-23 18:58:31
Edit : Quote

rikken Posts: > 500

I would be surprised if the Arc`s camera is not noticeably better than the x10`s But just as important imo is that they have made the camera quicker. I also fancy the new ui and the various flash settings
--
Posted: 2011-01-23 19:57:01
Edit : Quote
Page <  123 ... 545556 ... 392393394>

New Topic   Reply
Forum Index

Esato home