>
New Topic
>
Topic Locked
Esato Forum Index
>
General discussions >
Rumours
> SONY XPERIA Rumors 2014
Bookmark topic
CAUTION:
THE LAST PAGE CONTAINS NOVELS, SHORT STORIES AND EPICS. ENTER AT YOUR OWN RISK
--
Posted: 2014-09-19 14:42:38
Edit :
Quote
On 2014-09-19 14:42:38, itsjustJOH wrote:
CAUTION:
THE LAST PAGE CONTAINS NOVELS, SHORT STORIES AND EPICS. ENTER AT YOUR OWN RISK
😂
--
Posted: 2014-09-19 16:15:00
Edit :
Quote
On 2014-09-19 06:44:07, Tsepz_GP wrote:
The QHD argument reminds me of the 3.5mm headphone jack saga, when SE used their proprietary port, while the rest went 3.5. SE fans claimed to be happy with SE's port and didn't need a 3.5mm jack, of course when SE finally started using the jack the same fans praised them, not a single complaint, same with GPS in a phone, WiFi b/g/n etc...they claimed they didn't need them, when SE put them in they praised them, watch the same happen with a QHD display.
Exactly.SONY is slow to repond to evolution..once they respond they make great devices but by then they are left behind
On 2014-09-19 07:39:33, supercoolman wrote:
sounds like apple to me.
Yes..and APPLE can afford to do that..even SAMSUNG can,they have an epic fan base..SONY doesn't. The same old story..the top kid in the class can get away with few wrong doings but the back benchers cant.
On 2014-09-19 12:47:10, badassmam wrote:
I think Sony is one step away from greatness.
Yep,they have great stuffs just need to polish few things here and there.
[ This Message was edited by: Ranjith on 2014-09-19 15:54 ]
--
Posted: 2014-09-19 16:49:51
Edit :
Quote
On 2014-09-19 07:16:47, amirprog wrote:
Being against qhd is being against natural evolution. its like denying human evolution.
maybe its not good with 801 and current android, etc. but you can't exclude it forever. with that, lack of qhd is not why sony don't sell as much as they could but lack of availability, marketing, non existence inside us carriers, not competitive low-mid range devices...
@Tsepz_GP
that proprietary SE connector was crap from the get go. i was complaining in SE forums about it a lot when i had my w800i back in 2005 i think. it took SE i think 4 years to realize that its crap. still a great device though.
[ This Message was edited by: amirprog on 2014-09-19 06:18 ]
O rly? So please tell me, what's the resolution of Your PC or laptop, or computer that you work on? If 5-6" phones should get 2560x1440 resolution, then for 17" laptop it should be around 5000x2500 no?
Then enlighten me why it's typical for laptops or PC to work on 1080p? Even 50" TVs have 1080p, then tell my why on earth would you want QHD display on tiny phone? It's against any logic.
What's more, when you visit websites it's very typical that they show only low resolution images, you know how crappy it looks on QHD?
--
Posted: 2014-09-19 18:40:46
Edit :
Quote
TV's have started to adopt 4k. Also what has been said in the last 2-3 pages is that even if a certain tech is not the most useful one now,you need to go along with it because that will help you sell the product.SONY just posted another yearly loss,if they are going to ignore QHD and similar new techs they might as well just quit.
--
Posted: 2014-09-19 19:21:39
Edit :
Quote
@admad
You have your logic, i have mine. subtle changes are also changes. the same thing was with 720p, etc. why hd, blah blah. same thing, different story. history is repeated more then one time here. also, technology advancements are usually done in small steps, if you don't walk these steps and do what is in then you are out of the game. bottom line: if sony don't adopt qhd with z4 then they should stop making high end devices. i actually understand their decision not to put qhd in z3 because it should work better with s810, android L and supposedly with even more advancements in battery life.
@Ranjith
+1
--
Posted: 2014-09-19 19:50:32
Edit :
Quote
The problem with Sony is clearly with its lower tier phones and NOT with its Z series. Saw some disgusting posts mentioning that not putting QHD will see Sony market drop further.
Lol total nonsense.
Firstly, Sony didn't really make a "loss". It's a goodwill charge because Sony overestimated its potential of SMC. Of course a goodwill charge have to be recorded in the P&L, hence the gigantic loss.
Secondly, the problem with it's lower tier phone is its price. You get a Xiaomi for cheaper with better specifications or a Xperia, more expensive with lower specs. Quite common scene. And cut down the amount of lower tier released. E1, E3, M2, T3?!? Is Sony mad. During 2013, there's only one phone that represented Sony mid range - Xperia SP. Now with millions..
Sony needs to change more, other than cosmetically. Look at the Z1, the 20.7 MP camera created such an excitement that the previous rumour thread reached 1000+ pages. We ain't close this year. But again, their upper range models seems to be doing fine.
--
Posted: 2014-09-20 02:30:50
Edit :
Quote
I think the problem with the lower tier phones is that will all Sony devices they are R&D heavy products, which cost more to develop. Because of this they will always be undercut on price.
--
Posted: 2014-09-20 02:39:29
Edit :
Quote
On 2014-09-19 14:42:38, itsjustJOH wrote:
CAUTION:
THE LAST PAGE CONTAINS NOVELS, SHORT STORIES AND EPICS. ENTER AT YOUR OWN RISK
Not only the last page...
--
Posted: 2014-09-20 10:22:42
Edit :
Quote
supercoolman Posts: > 500
On 2014-09-19 14:42:38, itsjustJOH wrote:
CAUTION:
THE LAST PAGE CONTAINS NOVELS, SHORT STORIES AND EPICS. ENTER AT YOUR OWN RISK
a few episodes of drama without that scifi effect.
--
Posted: 2014-09-20 20:04:39
Edit :
Quote
New Topic
Topic Locked
