Esato Mobile
Sony Ericsson / Sony : General : Sony Ericsson C702 Cyber-shot discussion
> New Topic
> Reply
< Esato Forum Index > Sony Ericsson / Sony > General > Sony Ericsson C702 Cyber-shot discussion Bookmark topic
Page <  123 ... 565758 ... 606162>

TeknoBoi90 Posts: 164

Here are my 1-month-after general impressions... look... xD (some things are strictly related with my single unit...)

Great:

Nice design (the cool cyan is really cool)
Almost perfect software
Brilliant UI
Outdoor very good camera
Torch light (like with the K750 )
GPS Wow-effect
Alarms (have you ever seen so much settings??)
Perfect phonebook(thanks to the new key-layout)
Water resistance

Bad:

Low-light camera performance
Sometimes creaking battery cover
Stuck pixels (only with dark background)
All in all a low resistance to small scratches
Not-that-fast Media (with a lot of content)
No accelerometer
--
Posted: 2009-01-12 17:04:38
Edit : Quote

TeknoBoi90 Posts: 164


On 2009-01-12 11:57:10, imazz wrote:
Anybody tried Wayfinders Maploader with Wayfinder navigator?

The maploader works, in that it downloads maps to the C702, but I have no subscription to Wayfinder anymore, so cannot test that the preloaded maps are used.

It seems to be working with Wayfinder Earth.


Well, it's awesome, yesterday I thought about the SAME thing... As soon as I can I'll try it because TrekBuddy hasn't convinced me really and this could be the only alternative if you don't want to lose all our money for the connection...
--
Posted: 2009-01-12 17:09:18
Edit : Quote

number1 Posts: > 500


On 2009-01-12 17:04:38, TeknoBoi90 wrote:
Bad:

Low-light camera performance*
Sometimes creaking battery cover*
Stuck pixels (only with dark background)*
All in all a low resistance to small scratches
Not-that-fast Media (with a lot of content)*
No accelerometer



I'd have to disagree a bit,
camera is difficult to use in low yes, but when held 100% still it produces pretty decent pics,
I would also add the slow software under the bad, media menu is slow, it's also slows right down and almost gives up when muti-tasking, C702 has 2 speeds slow or super slow, also i have no stuck/dead pixels anywhere, also my battery cover is fine.
--
Posted: 2009-01-12 17:16:56
Edit : Quote

TeknoBoi90 Posts: 164


On 2009-01-12 17:16:56, number1 wrote:

On 2009-01-12 17:04:38, TeknoBoi90 wrote:
Bad:

Low-light camera performance*
Sometimes creaking battery cover*
Stuck pixels (only with dark background)*
All in all a low resistance to small scratches
Not-that-fast Media (with a lot of content)*
No accelerometer



I'd have to disagree a bit,
camera is difficult to use in low yes, but when held 100% still it produces pretty decent pics,
I would also add the slow software under the bad, media menu is slow, it's also slows right down and almost gives up when muti-tasking, C702 has 2 speeds slow or super slow, also i have no stuck/dead pixels anywhere, also my battery cover is fine.



Well, you're right about the night pics, but in fact the problem is when you're for example in a restaurant and you take a pic with people that often move etc... When taking a night landscape if you have a still hand they are quite good...
I don't have experienced that slow UI (R3DA029) only Media can be in difficulty when browsing (I have a 2GB MStick)...
Last thing, the cover two weeks ago was creaking especially when typing SMS, now it doesn't creak so I'm a bit confused however I accept it...
--
Posted: 2009-01-12 18:01:07
Edit : Quote

forceabuser Posts: 108

the only bad sides i have found after 2 months are:
- gps signal is weak as hell (compared to my previous n82)
- slow text input when music is playing
- rss stops updating after 4 or 5 days, and has become a part of the new media menu. i rather have it as an option under my quick menu.
- default firmware sucks ass. a nice way to lose a LOT of customers SE!
- no "play" button anymore.
- camera is lame in weak light settings. so is the video recorder in general.

i agree with the loss of the acceler-o-meter, but i am not shure i could hold it as a downside for this phone. SE has to stop adding hardware and features somewhere, otherwise it wouldnt be a midd range phone

_________________
i traded in my n82 for a c702 that is how much i

[ This Message was edited by: forceabuser on 2009-01-19 23:33 ]
--
Posted: 2009-01-20 00:31:50
Edit : Quote

number1 Posts: > 500

The c702 slows down alot when multi tasking my gps is fine but a little slow again its the software, the phone is let down by its crappy software.
--
Posted: 2009-01-20 00:40:13
Edit : Quote

tranced Posts: > 500

giving up so fast? firmware updates could fix some of these.
--
Posted: 2009-01-20 00:44:55
Edit : Quote

Sator1973 Posts: 242

C702 is not very fast but I can live with that as it will probably get better. But yesterday I got my first bluetoot headset and I noticed that playing music on that, the phone's interface (webbrowsing also) gets a lot slower (compared to wire). I guess it's due to the data transfer. So I think C702 really could have used a faster processor (or two). Well maybe I expect too much of my C702, anyhow I still like it a lot (hoping it will get better).
--
Posted: 2009-01-20 20:45:56
Edit : Quote

gtr83 Posts: > 500

At first I thought 160MB of internal storage would do it a world of good, but I realized the fault is with the processor.
--
Posted: 2009-01-21 13:52:45
Edit : Quote

number1 Posts: > 500

The processor is just as good as any other A2 phone most probley there all the same, the fault is just rubbish software.
--
Posted: 2009-01-21 14:18:38
Edit : Quote
Page <  123 ... 565758 ... 606162>

New Topic   Reply
Forum Index

Esato home