>
New Topic
>
Topic Locked
Esato Forum Index
>
Sony Ericsson / Sony >
General
> K850i vs N95 pic quality
Bookmark topic
max_wedge:
In certain far away shots, N95 has lost some details due to its sharpening.
But it is not the case in general. Take a look at this. You can see K850 got more ridiculous color and less detail.
Do a count and you see N95/82 produced much more better shots than K850. N95 do produce some bad shots but on the other most of K850 shots look bad compared to the others.
--
Posted: 2007-12-03 01:47:47
Edit :
Quote
plankgatan
Since you like to boast about K850 screen, let's take a look at a actual comparison (instead of those hogwash ones you posted). What have you got to say now?
Original article:
http://www.smape.com/en/revie[....]on/SonyEricsson_K850i-rev.html
--
Posted: 2007-12-03 12:06:35
Edit :
Quote
@max_wedge
I don't know who or when that picture was taken but it's very obvious the picture wasn't taken when the Camera was focused, even me a bad photographer that knows nothing gets better results than that. Who took that picture with the N95 Miles Flint or the new SE CEO?
@mib1800
Many thanks for posting a proper comparison with proper brightness settings at long last as the other pictures were just a joke and just what SE fans want to believe shame it isn't true as i repeatedly pointed out.
Marc
_________________
Nokia N95 8GB, SU-8W, Fring, Vox, Tom Tom 6, Shure EC2g
Honoured to have won BEST DEBATER
[ This Message was edited by: Dogmann on 2007-12-04 01:44 ]
--
Posted: 2007-12-04 02:44:10
Edit :
Quote
You know, if one checks all over the net, 99% of all tests agree the N95 is the winner (pic quality wise - is already 100% in everything als). Ok, there is still this 1% and I see some fans grabbing on straws
--
Posted: 2007-12-04 02:52:13
Edit :
Quote
Looking at the screen comparison, you can clearly see that N95 16m screen has much better color definition than K850 256K screen.
So a 16m color does really make a different.
--
Posted: 2007-12-04 04:32:42
Edit :
Quote
about the 100 percent crop comparisions -
You guys keep posting unfocused shots of the opposing phone you dont like! How biased is that?
If you want to compare fairly, make sure you compare two fully focused shots!
Some of these reviews are really useless - they post an unfocused shot of one phone or the other and say it has terrible quality, when it only takes an idiot to see its unfocused. Why not mention in their review the camera was not as reliable to get a decent shot in that certain environment?
The difference is very marginal IMO, quality is not much better than eachother!
[ This Message was edited by: soane28 on 2007-12-04 05:11 ]
--
Posted: 2007-12-04 06:10:12
Edit :
Quote
@soane
You guys keep posting unfocused shots of the opposing phone you dont like! How biased is that?
Just go and take a look at the K850 photos. At FULL size all of them look fuzzy and blurr (due to noise infestation). I think you should blame the K850 camera instead of the photographer
--
Posted: 2007-12-04 09:19:24
Edit :
Quote
Hi all
Well if you really look at the situation it is one group of fans that insist the K850 is quite simply the best which is what they stated before it was even released. They some how manage to totally ignore the majority of reviews and cling on to the couple that support their case. They also mange to dismiss all their fellow SE users and fans that are having lots of problems as all down to branding and any other justification they can dream up. Plus of course the famous SE mantra it will be fixed with the next Firmware yet again.
Whilst we are happy to say that the N95's camera is good and that is enough for most us and accept it is not the best camera in the world or perfect.
Sorry but one set of people are now really beginning to look very desperate sad and deluded and it's pretty obvious who they are to.
Marc
_________________
Nokia N95 8GB, SU-8W, Fring, Vox, Tom Tom 6, Shure EC2g
Honoured to have won BEST DEBATER
[ This Message was edited by: Dogmann on 2007-12-04 17:08 ]
--
Posted: 2007-12-04 13:42:01
Edit :
Quote
@dogmann,
yeah well, you're right,
but that'll never ever ever ever ever change! that attitude, no matter how tedious you find it, and how frustrating it is, it's gotta be useful on some level of evolution, otherwise that attitude wouldn't be around anymore...
it's like people voting for whatever crook their parents voted for...or worse (?) voting differently just to be a "rebel"!!!
so, you really have to tackle this thread at a more genetic level! and I meant genetic...not geneRic
--
Posted: 2007-12-04 17:00:48
Edit :
Quote
Hi
Long time reader, first third time poster. =)
GSM Arena have posted a nice camera comparison between the Nokia N95 8GB, SE K850i, Samsung G600 and the LG Viewty. Whilst this thread is only concerned with two of the above mentioned phones, it is still a valid comparison.
http://www.gsmarena.com/5_megapixel_faceoff-review-191.php
There is a hitch though. The shots are labeled A,B,C,D with no hint of which letter corresponds with which phone. They will however say which letter is which phone later on, but for now, the images have no name next to them. And don't bother looking for EXIF data either.
So basically have a look at the comparison and see which ones you like better. And then when the information is revealed, the superior model will be evident. This eliminates the bias factor which seems to affect a number of posters when they see the model which the image was shot from.
[ This Message was edited by: benly2 on 2007-12-06 07:35 ]
--
Posted: 2007-12-06 08:33:30
Edit :
Quote
New Topic
Topic Locked
