Esato Mobile
Sony Ericsson / Sony : General : K850i vs N95 pic quality
> New Topic
> Topic Locked
Esato Forum Index > Sony Ericsson / Sony > General > K850i vs N95 pic quality Bookmark topic
Page <  123 ... 596061 ... 676869>

Raiderski Posts: > 500

benly2
good link however, they should add I-Mobile 902
--
Posted: 2007-12-06 10:33:00
Edit : Quote

AbuBasim Posts: > 500


On 2007-12-06 10:33:00, Raiderski wrote:
benly2
good link however, they should add I-Mobile 902


The i-mobile 902 would put all the other camera phones to shame. But the problem with the 902 is that it's not widely available. The Far East and some parts of Southeast Asia is not enough. Everywhere else is only through gray imports with no warranty coverage.
--
Posted: 2007-12-06 11:09:41
Edit : Quote

yaniv84 Posts: 71


On 2007-12-01 03:20:45, mib1800 wrote:
here is another galore (13 pages in all) of photo comparo of N82, N95, K850, G600, LG viewty:-

http://publish.it168.com/2007/1129/20071129000401.shtml

Yet another comparo which shows K850 photos didnt perform that well at all against all the other 5Mp camphone....sigh

[edit] Viewed at full-size, K850 photos are so "flat" (i.e dont show depth very well) compared to N95 and N82.

[ This Message was edited by: mib1800 on 2007-12-01 02:45 ]


Wowwww the N82 realy good the k850 has low quality pic
--
Posted: 2007-12-09 07:52:45
Edit : Quote

islandprd Posts: 176

Sorry all Nokia brothers, I just felt something is needed to be straighten out. I really hate to add more flames unnecesarily to this flamed folder

Nokia photo alogarithm may have some issue with picture slight blurrines too, as reported at:

http://forum2.mobile-review.com/showpost.php?p=639855&postcount=607

another one:

http://forum2.mobile-review.com/showpost.php?p=639875&postcount=609

Conclusion both need to improve
--
Posted: 2007-12-09 08:56:00
Edit : Quote

QVGA Posts: > 500

Pic taken from N95

http://img216.imageshack.us/my.php?image=02122007199jv3.jpg
--
Posted: 2007-12-09 08:59:57
Edit : Quote

masseur Posts: > 500


Conclusion both need to improve


that conclusion has been reached a couple of times in this thread

but when is good... good enough?
--
Posted: 2007-12-09 09:00:15
Edit : Quote

islandprd Posts: 176


On 2007-12-09 09:00:15, masseur wrote:

Conclusion both need to improve


that conclusion has been reached a couple of times in this thread

but when is good... good enough?



I dont wish to add flames, but good is very subjective.

What is good may not be good for others. For casual users who dont meddle with photo setting and only need to print ocassionally, the K850 pic certainly is not shabby. This type of users may rather buy the phone for outer appearance (fashion) or compatibility to previous phones or peer preasure.

N95 is certainly produces more vibrant color and may appeal to many casual users too. However some may find the color is over-processed (a little fake) and the smudge on details is unreversible during editing.

No one absolutely right or wrong.

Sorry if I did not read that conclusion before as the thread is really long
--
Posted: 2007-12-09 09:13:54
Edit : Quote

masseur Posts: > 500

I think this conclusion was posted mostly to calm the thread so its not a bad thing to post the reminder

as for good... well, phone cams will probably never be as good as digital cameras and you can go to digial camera forums and see these exact same comparison discussions going on (nikon vs Sony etc) and so its clear that brand loyalty is going to cloud some peoples judgement

I was happy with pics from N95 and I am still happy with pics from K850, but then I don't examine them in minute detail I guess but many family and friends I forwarded pics from these phones to commented how great they looked and wanted to know what digital camera I was using!
--
Posted: 2007-12-09 09:18:58
Edit : Quote

AbuBasim Posts: > 500

GSMArena.com has not yet posted the answers to the 5 MP blind test. Most comments vote for phones C and A as the best. I have a feeling that one of the "parties" fighting it out in this thread will be disappointed when the answer is finally given. The photos from phones C and A show less noise (i.e. more forceful noise reduction) so I would bet that neither of these are the K850i.

_________________
Snuck! It's ointment time! -- Mad Jack the Pirate

[ This Message was edited by: AbuBasim on 2007-12-09 08:35 ]
--
Posted: 2007-12-09 09:26:21
Edit : Quote

razec Posts: > 500


On 2007-12-09 09:26:21, AbuBasim wrote:
GSMArena.com has not yet posted the answers to the 5 MP blind test. Most comments vote for phones C and A as the best. I have a feeling that one of the "parties" fighting it out in this thread will be disappointed when the answer is finally given . . .



Before they put K850 into the arena of 5mp cam phone war they should wait first for it's firmware to stabilize. specifically the color reproduction algorithm and the flash sync. it's decieving when a neophyte phone user saw GSMArena's comparision declaring N95 winner on color reproduction or N82 winner on flash when K850 can do better than it does once the colors and flash sync was fixed later on. i myself doubt the N82's flash being more powerful than K850 as the latter have some issues with the flash sync that makes night pics darker than N82. and another thing was that N82's flash on composed pictures evidently shows excessive artifacts that speaks for the use of extensive boost for the Flash ISO just to make N82 flash images appear brighter and better than K850s.

_________________
Never Give Up! "Our Greatest glory is not in never failing - but in rising everytime we fall"

Have wish for this christmas? tell it here - 2 mockup wishes granted, Hoping for

[ This Message was edited by: razec on 2007-12-09 08:37 ]
--
Posted: 2007-12-09 09:34:40
Edit : Quote
Page <  123 ... 596061 ... 676869>

New Topic   Topic Locked
Forum Index

Esato home