>
New Topic
>
Reply<
Esato Forum Index
>
Sony Ericsson / Sony >
General
> Sony Ericsson 8.1MP C905 Discussion (Shiho)
Bookmark topic
Oh dear, I seem to be one of the few here not creaming my pants - 18mm thick but NO OPTICAL ZOOM?! Hell, some real cameras are thinner than that!
I'll stick with my Canon A710IS & SE890i for a while yet. It takes more than pixel count to produce decent photos
--
Posted: 2008-06-20 18:19:45
Edit :
Quote
korbindallis Posts: > 500
On 2008-06-20 11:53:51, jepherberich wrote:
@NightBlade ah, yes that does look more like a video call camera. Most of the other shots have a smaller squarish hole to the left (GSMArena image below). I wonder why we don't have information on a non-3G/non-video-calling version, if there's really 2 versions like the K800/K790 did. More hope, I guess.
[ This Message was edited by: jepherberich on 2008-06-20 10:56 ]
exactly !
--
Posted: 2008-06-20 18:21:07
Edit :
Quote
On 2008-06-20 18:07:23, crossmatched wrote:
if c905 won't have VGA recoring capabilities..
if VGA willl affect too much its battery performance..
It'll only affect battery life while one's actually recording a video... and not too much.
--
Posted: 2008-06-20 18:38:02
Edit :
Quote
crossmatched Posts: > 500
On 2008-06-20 18:38:02, NightBlade wrote:
On 2008-06-20 18:07:23, crossmatched wrote:
if c905 won't have VGA recoring capabilities..
if VGA willl affect too much its battery performance..
It'll only affect battery life while one's actually recording a video... and not too much.
but of cousre mate. that's what i meant NightBlade.
Maybe
doesn't want an N95 battery performance on c905.
video recording at VGA is a huge power drainer. and also a big memory eater.
--
Posted: 2008-06-20 19:04:44
Edit :
Quote
On 2008-06-20 18:19:45, busb wrote:
Oh dear, I seem to be one of the few here not creaming my pants - 18mm thick but NO OPTICAL ZOOM?! Hell, some real cameras are thinner than that!
I'll stick with my Canon A710IS & SE890i for a while yet. It takes more than pixel count to produce decent photos
Well, the majority of us don't like to 'Cream our pants'...
Busb, you must realise that the Camera module in the C905 uses a LARGER sensor, and has a Xenon Flash - See fig 1.
Fig.1
So to summarise, as the C905 uses a larger (8MP) Sensor - along with Xenon Flash - and uses a HSUPA radio - realise that you are asking for a handset much more the size of the SO905iCS, which clocks in at roughly 24mm.
Plus due to the smaller aperture caused by the increasing Optical zoom, the sensor gets less light and shots become increasingly noisy, as the camera tries to 'balance' things out.
From there on, things get quite messy - what with noisy photographs et all.
With what also seems a larger Xenon flash, its anyones guess that the Capacitators needed to power it are larger too.
Take my word for it, you'd much rather have a powerful Xenon flash in the dark, than a primitive Optical Zoom (which works great in Digital cameras mind you).
Add to it, the PhotoFlash tube LED is effective - but it'll never be a Xenon.
_________________
Sony Alpha.
imaging.like.no.other
www.mypumas.net
Sony PlayStation 3 ID:
mypumas
[ This Message was edited by: Sony α on 2008-06-20 18:31 ]
--
Posted: 2008-06-20 19:19:09
Edit :
Quote
It as dedicated audio chip or not.
--
Posted: 2008-06-20 20:03:44
Edit :
Quote
So I guess for the C905 to be "perfect" for some of you...it's either Optical zoom or VGA recording? Considering these two features are negligible depending on who, I'd say this phone is "perfect" as is.
--
Posted: 2008-06-20 22:55:53
Edit :
Quote
VGA recording, Optical zoom, 3D acceleration, Dolby chip (for 5.1 audio - it's in development right as we speek), and powerful CPU with decent amount of RAM + OLED display, good sensor+lens AND a good platform makes perfect phone
... IMO ^_^
EDIT: don't forget the video projector (japs already released first phone with projector, small and cool)
[ This Message was edited by: norbi_nw on 2008-06-20 22:51 ]
--
Posted: 2008-06-20 23:49:31
Edit :
Quote
@Norbi_nw
Dude - I hoped i'd made it clear earlier - when referring to the Japanese, please refrain from using the term 'Japs'...
Instead use JPN, or JP...
Thanks.
--
Posted: 2008-06-21 00:00:18
Edit :
Quote
Wow, norbi. Your needs are very high indeed.
--
Posted: 2008-06-21 00:05:52
Edit :
Quote
New Topic
Reply
