>
New Topic
>
Reply<
Esato Forum Index
>
General discussions >
Non mobile discussion
> Princess Diana crash findings due
Bookmark topic
Quote:
On 2006-12-15 13:00:33, goldenface wrote:
@axxxr
Why is that?
Just because she was cavorting on yaghts with the Al-Fayeds doesn't mean she was gonna start her own dynasty with one of them.
Why not wait until she got pregnant and then push her down the stairs?
Murdering someone just on the off-chance they might get pregnant is a bit far fetched.
Like i mentioned her possibly having a child with Al-fayed or her True love Dr Hasnat Khan (which was more likely) was only one of the reasons why she was Murdered.
Who said anything about her starting her own Dynasty?..the risk of her having even 1 child would have been enough,she always said that she wanted to settle down and start a new family.
pushing her down the stairs,i could imagine the Queen doing that!
Killing her the way they did,made it look like an accident!
And if this was an accident like you say then why did she fear for her life?and why did she say she was going to be killed in a Car accident? ..isn't it obvious from her journals that someone was out to get her?
--
Posted: 2006-12-15 14:04:56
Edit :
Quote
All the Royal Family are threatened on a regular basis.
Prince Charles is well-known for his religious tolerance so why would it be so abhorrent for Princes William and Harry to have a Muslim half brother?
There are Catholics in the Royal Family too.
She feared for her life because her and the Royal family parted company and became enemies. She had affairs but then so did Charles.
_________________
I
my W900i
[ This Message was edited by: goldenface on 2006-12-15 13:33 ]
--
Posted: 2006-12-15 14:24:12
Edit :
Quote
Residentevil Posts: > 500
The whole think is just one double cross after another.
--
Posted: 2006-12-15 14:28:25
Edit :
Quote
Quote:
On 2006-12-15 14:24:12, goldenface wrote:
All the Royal Family are threatened on a regular basis.
Prince Charles is well-known for his religious tolerance so why would it be so abhorrent for Princes William and Harry to have a Muslim half brother?
There are Catholics in the Royal Family too.
She feared for her life because her and the Royal family parted company and became enemies. She had affairs but then so did Charles.
They proberbly are threatened,but she was specific in the fact the Royal family wanted her out of the way so to speak...
A lot of other faiths are tolerant to each in other in this country,not out of choice but due to the law of the land.Prince charles has to set an example which is why he has to show Religious tolerance...so my point being showing religious tolerance is one thing and having Muslims introduced into Pure blood Royalty quite another!
And this still doesn't answer my question why she was specific about being killed in a Car accident?...your most likely going to put this down to coincidence aswell?
--
Posted: 2006-12-15 14:44:35
Edit :
Quote
Well of course they would have liked her to have gone quietly but that doesn't mean they bumped her off.
Also, Prince Charles doesn't have to do anything of the type if he doesn't want to. Yes it would be frowned upon if he displayed religious intolerance but he is most certainly allowed express his point of view like anyone else is. There is no law telling him to accept all faiths - he has done that because of the person he is.
What do you mean by "introduced into pure blood royalty"?
She mentioned to her butler that a car crash was being planned to get rid of her. That still isn't proof that what happened in the Alma Tunnel was orchestrated.
_________________
I
my W900i
[ This Message was edited by: goldenface on 2006-12-15 14:04 ]
--
Posted: 2006-12-15 15:04:17
Edit :
Quote
Quote:
On 2006-12-15 15:04:17, goldenface wrote:
Well of course they would have liked her to have gone quietly but that doesn't mean they bumped her off.
Why not?
Quote:
On 2006-12-15 15:04:17, goldenface wrote:
Also, Prince Charles doesn't have to do anything of the type if he doesn't want to. Yes it would be frowned upon if he displayed religious intolerance but he is most certainly allowed express his point of view like anyone else is. There is no law telling him to accept all faiths - he has done that because of the person he is.
I know he doesn't but it does look good if does,as it wins the hearts and minds of minoritys in this country.
Quote:
On 2006-12-15 15:04:17, goldenface wrote:
What do you mean by "introduced into pure blood royalty"?
Meaning if Diana ever had any children they would be the first Muslims in the British Royal family! ...which goes against the rules of the monarchy.
Quote:
On 2006-12-15 15:04:17, goldenface wrote:
She mentioned to her butler that a car crash was being planned to get rid of her. That still isn't proof that what happened in the Alma Tunnel was orchestrated.
I think thats proof enough,that her assasination was being planned and she knew about it!
--
Posted: 2006-12-15 15:24:14
Edit :
Quote
Diana Bump!
Has anything new come from this? I haven't had time to catch up yet?
--
Posted: 2007-10-04 12:02:41
Edit :
Quote
here is the official site for the inquest and it has a
list of 20 likely issues that will be covered
I think so far its just been opening statements
--
Posted: 2007-10-04 12:07:25
Edit :
Quote
Jeez! There are things there that I didn't even think of. Well if this doesn't stop the conspiracy theories then I don't know what will.
Oh, to be a fly on the wall in that courtroom. I've done Jury Service before but I would love to be one on this.
--
Posted: 2007-10-04 12:18:37
Edit :
Quote
Looks like Henri Paul wasn't as innocent as some people thought. Apparently it was him that tipped off the paparrazi.
Latest.
--
Posted: 2007-10-05 10:04:28
Edit :
Quote
New Topic
Reply
