>
New Topic
>
Reply<
Esato Forum Index
>
Sony Ericsson / Sony >
General
> K800 camera outperforms N95
Bookmark topic
I own a K800 and before have been always a Nokia user.
Now I thought I could switch back to Nokia, even if I have to confess that I'm perfectly fitted into my K800.
So I've started this thread just to show my disappointment, given it's specs, about N95 camera.
Now it's flaming!
We're not talking about overall value, just camera. And we're not saying that camera is all.
Having said, so I'm still convinced that, at the moment, K800 takes better pics.
I hope (for Nokia) that the N95's firmware will improve to exploit it's potential.
Ok?
--
Posted: 2007-06-10 00:37:15
Edit :
Quote
i am just explaining to you why N95 might not be the best camera phone. when comparing, you have to take other aspects into consideration aswell.
--
Posted: 2007-06-10 00:39:43
Edit :
Quote
I still believe that the N95 STILL captures sharper images compared with the K800 !
--
Posted: 2007-06-10 00:57:42
Edit :
Quote
qvga, now are you claiming that n95 is not so good after all???
--
Posted: 2007-06-10 01:07:02
Edit :
Quote
I have some comparison pics from mobile-burn.com
http://www.mobileburn.com/story.jsp?Page=1&Id=3298
you may give your comments here on this thread
--
Posted: 2007-06-10 09:13:59
Edit :
Quote
i have sustained and will sustain k800 takes better pictures than n95
--
Posted: 2007-06-10 10:01:55
Edit :
Quote
On 2007-06-10 01:07:02, antichrist wrote:
qvga, now are you claiming that n95 is not so good after all???
answer my questions that i asked you earlier, popping in out of nowhere only when you see a shimmer of hope that i might accept N95 isnt good.
the comparison shots are infront of you, make up your judgment. N95 takes better/similar pics to K800. K800 is blurred, out of focus
--
Posted: 2007-06-10 10:02:44
Edit :
Quote
Let me get this straight, you can still compare a 3mp, 1 yr old phone with a brand new 5mp phone? That shouldn't even happen now should it? I think it's in the compression, no matter how high the pixels can go, it should still be sizeable enough for storage, and given N95s limitation in this area perhaps this is why they're comparable? Just a thought.
[ This Message was edited by: mode on 2007-06-11 04:38 ]
--
Posted: 2007-06-10 10:15:04
Edit :
Quote
that shots were the first images i have seen to compare k800 and n95!!
--
Posted: 2007-06-10 10:38:37
Edit :
Quote
On 2007-06-10 10:02:44, QVGA wrote:
On 2007-06-10 01:07:02, antichrist wrote:
qvga, now are you claiming that n95 is not so good after all???
answer my questions that i asked you earlier, popping in out of nowhere only when you see a shimmer of hope that i might accept N95 isnt good.
the comparison shots are infront of you, make up your judgment. N95 takes better/similar pics to K800. K800 is blurred, out of focus
if you call K800 pictures "blurred" and "out of focus", then how will you call the pictures provided by my previous post? blurred? out of focus?
look at the glass thing, it's closer than N95 does--proving that K800's macro takes closer distances than N95(K800 can reach >10cm whilst N95 can do only at minimum of 10cm
)
--
Posted: 2007-06-10 11:43:48
Edit :
Quote
New Topic
Reply
