Esato Mobile
Sony Ericsson / Sony : General : Sony Ericsson C902 Cyber-shot discussion
> New Topic
> Reply
< Esato Forum Index > Sony Ericsson / Sony > General > Sony Ericsson C902 Cyber-shot discussion Bookmark topic
Page <  123 ... 678 ... 646566>

Mige Posts: 453

Quote:On 2008-05-05 22:34:28, l33tgod wrote:
Sorry, meant to add in my opinion. Just had many bad experiences with candy bars styles.

edit: Also think sliders, swivels, and clamshells have more styles that are more pleasant on the eyes.

[ This Message was edited by: l33tgod on 2008-05-05 21:37 ]


uhm... candy bars or clamshells?
--
Posted: 2008-05-08 06:39:19
Edit : Quote

mode Posts: > 500


On 2008-05-05 21:14:47, Tobbis wrote:
QVGA and many others thinks that 2.0 inch is too small. Some of us has other tastes and need and think that 2.0 inch is the perfect sice. Cant we leave it there?


I don't think screen size is a matter of taste. For instance if you have a choice to get a 17" or a 29" TV for the same price, which would you opt for? Or if you can get $10 or $100 off an identical item, which would you grab? As opposed to keypad vs keyboard, TS vs non-TS etc which highly depends on one's preference. The only consideration one could make in regards to screen size is battery life, but that could easily be addressed with the option of higher capacity battery.

_________________
Ericsson EH97, GA628, GF768, A2618s, T29s Sony Ericsson T68i, S700i, P990i, Z558i
P990i + WG1 R6E28 + 8GB Sandisk MSPD + BST-40

[ This Message was edited by: mode on 2008-05-08 11:00 ]
--
Posted: 2008-05-08 11:12:58
Edit : Quote

ash_90 Posts: 34


On 2008-05-05 22:34:28, l33tgod wrote:

Also think sliders, swivels, and clamshells have more styles that are more pleasant on the eyes.

[ This Message was edited by: l33tgod on 2008-05-05 21:37 ]


I don't think so.. I love my k800i more than my previous w300i..
Its just matter of taste.
--
Posted: 2008-05-08 11:16:31
Edit : Quote

Sony α Posts: > 500

Well,

I am just hoping the C902 has a decent camera - I will get it when I return from Japan - only if it has an accurate Colour range - ie no pink to red Conversion - thats so embarassing - And im hoping the build quality is rock solid, dare I say it - like the Nokia 6300!

C902

images.like.no.other.hopefully
--
Posted: 2008-05-08 11:55:14
Edit : Quote

bomber21 Posts: 10

A Greek online shop priced the C902 399 euros.

http://www.play247.gr/index.p[....]turers_id=20&products_id=10214
--
Posted: 2008-05-08 12:44:43
Edit : Quote

QVGA Posts: > 500


On 2008-05-05 21:42:10, NightBlade wrote:

On 2008-05-05 20:47:41, QVGA wrote:
Most phones coming these days are 2.4'' or more.

\\
No, they don't. Most phones you are considering are high-ends.

Is W910 a high end phone? NO.
Is C902 a high end phone, YES.
Its amazing how you people jump ship. SE comes up with a big screened phone and everyone's all praises for its screen, just look at the W910 thread. And when they come up with a small screened phone, suddenly its no longer a requirement. Seriously, pick a taste.
--
Posted: 2008-05-08 15:34:11
Edit : Quote

NightBlade Posts: > 500

First off, I said most. And yet still, I'd say 2.2" is standard for mid- to high-end phones.
Second, I never said that SE did a good thing by putting a 2" screen on the C902. I just said that associating the screen size with the camera megapixels doesn't make much sense. Doing so with its position in the portfolio does (make sense ).
--
Posted: 2008-05-08 15:43:54
Edit : Quote

Tobbis Posts: 16


On 2008-05-08 11:12:58, mode wrote:

On 2008-05-05 21:14:47, Tobbis wrote:
QVGA and many others thinks that 2.0 inch is too small. Some of us has other tastes and need and think that 2.0 inch is the perfect sice. Cant we leave it there?


I don't think screen size is a matter of taste. For instance if you have a choice to get a 17" or a 29" TV for the same price, which would you opt for? Or if you can get $10 or $100 off an identical item, which would you grab? As opposed to keypad vs keyboard, TS vs non-TS etc which highly depends on one's preference. The only consideration one could make in regards to screen size is battery life, but that could easily be addressed with the option of higher capacity battery.

[ This Message was edited by: mode on 2008-05-08 11:00 ]


For instance if you have a choice to carry around a 17" or a 29" TV everywhere you go, which would you grab? Cant we just stop the debate about which screen size is the best. It IS a matter of taste.
--
Posted: 2008-05-08 18:14:28
Edit : Quote

mode Posts: > 500

@Tobbis
I would understand if you wanna stop talking about screen size, it probably has a lot to do with your seemingly lack of good excuses to defend a lost cause. And just in case you've totally lost touch of reality, people don't go around carrying TV sets, and even if you absolutely have to after buying one, surely you'd choose the 29" TV since the time you'd spend enjoying it would surely outspan and outweigh the relatively minute amount of time transporting it. It's fine if you want to defend your favourite brand which coincidentally is mine as well, but please don't resort to wishful thinking, disputing the undisputable fact that a bigger screen is ALWAYS better for the eyes than a smaller one.
--
Posted: 2008-05-08 19:26:33
Edit : Quote

badassmam Posts: > 500

If you take good photos, you would want to look at them on a big screen to get the most out of the quality. I wish it had a TV out, that would be cool. I don't see why SE have not done so.
--
Posted: 2008-05-08 19:40:41
Edit : Quote
Page <  123 ... 678 ... 646566>

New Topic   Reply
Forum Index

Esato home