>
New Topic
>
Reply<
Esato Forum Index
>
Sony Ericsson / Sony >
General
> K800 vs C902 pictures please
Bookmark topic
Once again planks pic is resized, how is anyone ment to judge quality on a resized pic is the cam really that bad the pic has to be resized to make it look half decent.
low-light from my k800 1/3 shutter iso 320 fullsized
http://www.esato.com/phonepho[....]y+ericsson&model=k800i+special
i didn't take that many low-light pics with my k800i because it wasn't that good in low-light.
The c702 does a half decent job but nothing manages low-light like the s700 which is 4 years old.
http://www.esato.com/phonepho[....]make=sony+ericsson&model=s700i
--
Posted: 2008-08-23 20:56:26
Edit :
Quote
Raiderski, bravo
I know this but many people not...
btw. all planks low light pics are always 1/1000 or 1/640... I want to see real low light pic with 1/15, or 1/8...
Lol when plank post pic from 6220 and exposure 1/20 it was blured, he can't still his hand with 1/20... Yea plank is best photographer...
_________________
http://www.flickr.com/photos/milanche91
Ericsson 628>3210>3310>3410>3510>siemens mc60>K750i>> 2x nokia 6630>>w810i>>K800i+2GB modded to max
[ This Message was edited by: milan91 on 2008-08-23 20:10 ]
--
Posted: 2008-08-23 21:09:38
Edit :
Quote
On 2008-08-23 21:09:38, milan91 wrote:
Lol when plank post pic from 6220 and exposure 1/20 it was blured, he can't still his hand with 1/20... Yea plank is best photographer...
I don't think it's so much to do with that as the phone can be placed on a flat surface and the selftimer used, it's more to do with the c902 can't handle proper low-light so all we're gonna get are resized pics no high than iso 64.
--
Posted: 2008-08-23 21:17:26
Edit :
Quote
would be nice to see something like ISO400 1/8s in full size, this will be the best example
--
Posted: 2008-08-23 21:45:58
Edit :
Quote
On 2008-08-23 21:45:58, Raiderski wrote:
would be nice to see something like ISO400 1/8s in full size, this will be the best example
It would be easier to get blood from a stone lol
--
Posted: 2008-08-23 21:50:25
Edit :
Quote
On 2008-08-23 21:45:58, Raiderski wrote:
would be nice to see something like ISO400 1/8s in full size, this will be the best example
I know of a camphone that uses up to 10 seconds at ISO 50...
(Hint: it has a Sony 5 MP CCD sensor. Default shutter speed in Night mode is 4 seconds max but it can go up to 10 with EV +2.)
--
Posted: 2008-08-23 22:38:55
Edit :
Quote
On 2008-08-23 22:38:55, AbuBasim wrote:
On 2008-08-23 21:45:58, Raiderski wrote:
would be nice to see something like ISO400 1/8s in full size, this will be the best example
I know of a camphone that uses up to 10 seconds at ISO 50...
(Hint: it has a Sony 5 MP CCD sensor. Default shutter speed in Night mode is 4 seconds max but it can go up to 10 with EV +2.)
The i-mobile and goodluck holding that still, don't them shutter speeds just make it impossible to use.
--
Posted: 2008-08-23 22:40:38
Edit :
Quote
well, I found ugly pic from C902 (exposure 1/8, ISO500, full size) which wasn't that easy. I tried to prepare similar light and subject for K800, with manual functions I set exposure and ISO, next step was to take ugly snapshot and then compare both
1. we are talking about "comparision" not comparision
2. I'm not posting any pics, still waiting for full size night pic from this forum to repeat test
do you remember hot pixels (red, green, blue) on K800 pics when ISO is growing up? well, ISO500 picture from C902 don't have this pixels, can we open the champagne now? hold on, there is also chroma noise on both pics which is quite normal, level of this noise on both pictures seems to be identical. C902 is more sensitive on red/pink color (more noise) while K800 sensitivity seems to be identical on all colors
ok, at least C902 don't have hot pixels to ISO500, this is good improvement! everything else doesn't matter for now
--
Posted: 2008-08-24 00:40:57
Edit :
Quote
On 2008-08-23 22:40:38, number1 wrote:
On 2008-08-23 22:38:55, AbuBasim wrote:
On 2008-08-23 21:45:58, Raiderski wrote:
would be nice to see something like ISO400 1/8s in full size, this will be the best example
I know of a camphone that uses up to 10 seconds at ISO 50...
(Hint: it has a Sony 5 MP CCD sensor. Default shutter speed in Night mode is 4 seconds max but it can go up to 10 with EV +2.)
The i-mobile and goodluck holding that still, don't them shutter speeds just make it impossible to use.
Yes, of course, and that's not different from any other camphone shooting night shots, is it? With any camera (phone), if the shutter is slower than 1/20s, shooting handheld is difficult without blurring the photos.
Or maybe you prefer the new type of "image stabilisation" used in some digicams and SE's cyber-shot camphones: very high ISO with fast shutter but with lots of noise. This feature is even available on my Fuji F40fd but I never use it as the result looks like sh*t, almost as bad as those oil paintings produced by the N95...
--
Posted: 2008-08-24 05:08:27
Edit :
Quote
im 100% sure that C902 produce better night & low light pics then K810...(ive been taken to many low light pics with k800/k810 to know the difference)
and number1... of course C902 use a larger sensor then K810.
K810 sensor is 6.47mm diagonal... (unit cell size 2.5ym)
C902 isensor is 6.52mm diagonal.... (unit cell size 2.0ym)
(if we say C902 use some kind of IMX-02X (which it probably do))
_________________
I
C902,
W810 &
T29
------------------------------------
http://www.flickr.com/photos/21179102@N07/
(t610, t630, k700, k750, k800, k810, k850)
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2008-08-24 07:49 ]
--
Posted: 2008-08-24 08:35:53
Edit :
Quote
New Topic
Reply
