>
New Topic
>
Reply<
Esato Forum Index
>
Sony Ericsson / Sony >
General
> C902 vs LG KF750 Secret
Bookmark topic
Marty, sincerely i don’t care what you think, i haven’t never seen one interesting/smart post or discussion from you. If me or others guys discuss the objects of the thread and you don’t like it the problem is only yours. Fortunately not all the world have your troubles or a lot of time to waste like you, here there’s only you that like to play the fool. Do you want to continue? Please contact me with PM.
Back on topic...
Macro mode:
--
Posted: 2008-09-21 19:05:11
Edit :
Quote
why dont you post some more compare pics instead..example some low light, indoor, flash, etc, etc. (something who is relative with this thread)
edit.
(this macro pics by Secret feels weak, the colors looks washed out, (especially the green color))
how green plants looks in our garden........
_________________
I
C902,
W810 &
T29
cellphone picture collection:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/21179102@N07/
(t610, t630, k700, k750, k800, k810, k850)
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2008-09-21 20:59 ]
--
Posted: 2008-09-21 21:04:59
Edit :
Quote
On 2008-09-21 21:04:59, plankgatan wrote:
why dont you post some more compare pics +
Because i don’t have (and don’t want) the C902...do you remember this?
I post some macros and you can post some macros…then we can compare the pics!
You post some low light pic (for example iso 400 and exp.
On 2008-09-21 21:04:59, plankgatan wrote:
this macro pics by Secret feels weak, the colors looks washed out, (especially the green color)
When you are looking at Secret’s pics, it doesn’t mean that if there’s a white area the photos are washed out.
The above macro pics have for sure wonderful details and great colors rendering , green included.
--
Posted: 2008-09-22 00:00:47
Edit :
Quote
Oh my God...
This thread is so stupid!!
it begins with a camera comparisson of 2 phones and ended with the same people talking the same Bs that is almost in all camera related threads.
--
Posted: 2008-09-22 01:00:50
Edit :
Quote
A thread "so stupid" that you couldn't resist participating in!
Good morning plankgatan! How's the weather in Norkopping? It's cold and cloudy here, so, please, specify what sort of a photo your heart desires to see uploaded.
[ This Message was edited by: haki on 2008-09-22 09:10 ]
--
Posted: 2008-09-22 10:07:01
Edit :
Quote
On 2008-09-22 10:07:01, haki wrote:
Norkopping
Norrköping!
Edit: Maybe I'm wrong? Google on "Norkopping" returns 5940 hits with SafeSearch on and 6080 hits with SafeSearch off so there are 140 pages talking about something naughty going on in Norkopping
_________________
Snuck! It's ointment time! -- Mad Jack the Pirate
[ This Message was edited by: AbuBasim on 2008-09-22 09:18 ]
--
Posted: 2008-09-22 10:13:53
Edit :
Quote
You are right about the double r, but the "umlaut" thing over the "o" is inconvenient to type!
--
Posted: 2008-09-22 10:26:47
Edit :
Quote
i want some real compare-low light, -night, -macro pictures.....and so on.
like i said before, after i look at this MANY indoor/low light pics by Secret,
http://www.flickr.com/photos/h2-blog/sets/72157605176361808/
i once again understood "why" we dont see any more pics then daylight pics.
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2008-09-22 14:22 ]
--
Posted: 2008-09-22 11:12:44
Edit :
Quote
we are just tired to hear "ohh, C902/Secret have so great" camera...bla bla.
--
Posted: 2008-09-22 11:25:40
Edit :
Quote
I already posted the same photo as above after a one-second sharpening process! NOT ALL PEOPLE prefer sharp photos! Also, if you have a noise-free photo (like Secret produces) it is very easy to sharpen it a bit. On the other hand, if you have a photo FULL of noise, like the C902 photos, you are stuck with it, no matter what noise-removal software you process it with.
There you go once again.
What do you mean "real macro"? Wasn't the photo of the watch sufficient? After that you should have stopped mentioning the word "macro" in this thread.
What do you mean "real night"? Many people have mentioned that your perception of "night" and "low light" is "somewhat different" from an "average" person's perception,
[ This Message was edited by: haki on 2008-09-22 10:41 ]
--
Posted: 2008-09-22 11:28:18
Edit :
Quote
New Topic
Reply
