>
New Topic
>
Reply<
Esato Forum Index
>
Sony Ericsson / Sony >
General
> short comparision c902 & c905
Bookmark topic
ofcourse all marcus pictures looks good, they are taken in very very bright conditions, and with sun direct in object...
he doesnt have any special camera model, he have newer one like one in retail c905.
this shots are great just like marcus photos
http://www.esato.com/phonepho[....]&make=sony+ericsson&model=c905
http://www.esato.com/phonepho[....]&make=sony+ericsson&model=c905
people just need better light condtions and they will make same photos like marcus
and from what i can see marcus also use latest firmware...so its just you plank and you conspiracy theoris
_________________
[ This Message was edited by: Vipera ammodytes on 2008-11-12 18:53 ]
--
Posted: 2008-11-12 19:51:49
Edit :
Quote
Vipera, you both wrong & right...several of Marcus pics is night shoots, cloudy shoots, low light shoots, and still looks super good.......and you right that many is shoot in sunlight, but this are also better then this here...they have better sharpness, etc)
sure, its very possible it his photo skills who make everything better.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
little curious....how can c905 pics looks more yellow ?? (im not saying you have edit them, i just saying they looks increased in some way).
(it looks like c902 is shoot with auto color settings & c905 with cloudy settings) ....just my oppinion.
c902
c905
i tried cloudy settings on my c902 one time, and the result became like this, (became to yellow i think):
_________________
I

C902,

W810 &

T29
cellphone pics:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/21179102@N07/
(t610, t630, k700, k750, k800, k810, k850)
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2008-11-12 20:10 ]
--
Posted: 2008-11-12 20:28:47
Edit :
Quote
Yeah, it may look that way, but they're not, they both had white balance set at cloudy on all the pics.
--
Posted: 2008-11-12 21:14:20
Edit :
Quote
WB profiles in C902 are less saturated. better? it's the matter of taste but too strong cloudy WB doesn't look good in cloudy days, it's ridiculous
--
Posted: 2008-11-12 21:14:53
Edit :
Quote
naveedaziz83 Posts: > 500
i think the c905 are excellent ..
--
Posted: 2008-11-12 21:45:15
Edit :
Quote
i think they looks fake
most people who own c902 knows "how" cloudy WB looks........
--
Posted: 2008-11-12 22:44:41
Edit :
Quote
naveedaziz83 Posts: > 500
so when someone else take pics they are fake and when you take them they are real??? .... hmmmmm ... think about what you just said ... dont be so judgmental ..
--
Posted: 2008-11-12 22:47:08
Edit :
Quote
no, absolutely not...i can easily say when someone elses pics is good..whitout any doubt.
its not one single c902 picture who have some kind of cloudy WB nuance.......(when you choose that cloudy setting on a c902, it starts to produce quite big yellow/thick colors...this looks plain auto)...and thats my oppinion.
am i the only one who dont see any cloudy nuance on this pictures ???
(c902 pics looks white/natural...and c905 looks taken with cloudy wb = yellow thicker colors)
c902
c905
c902
c905
_________________
I

C902,

W810 &

T29
cellphone pics:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/21179102@N07/
(t610, t630, k700, k750, k800, k810, k850)
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2008-11-12 21:57 ]
--
Posted: 2008-11-12 22:53:01
Edit :
Quote
On 2008-11-12 22:53:01, plankgatan wrote:
no, absolutely not...i can easily say when someone elses pics is good..whitout any doubt.
its not one single c902 picture who have some kind of cloudy WB nuance.......thats my oppinion.
This is not a question of opinion, is it? Either I am lying or you're wrong since the fact is I used cloudy in WB. I will take a couple shots tomorrow on auto and on cloudy with the c902 tomorrow so you can compare. I
--
Posted: 2008-11-12 22:56:51
Edit :
Quote
naveedaziz83 Posts: > 500
bialynia is right plank .. by you saying that the pics are fake means that we is lying .. even though he said he used cloudy WB ...
u dnt always have to b right plank ...
--
Posted: 2008-11-12 22:59:23
Edit :
Quote
New Topic
Reply