>
New Topic
>
Reply<
Esato Forum Index
>
Sony Ericsson / Sony >
Symbian phones
> Satio vs Nokia N8
Bookmark topic
i am really disappointed in these low light shots from N8.. i hoped for much better
[ This Message was edited by: jake20 on 2010-09-17 15:03 ]
--
Posted: 2010-09-17 15:56:28
Edit :
Quote
Maybe it about time and software optimization, just my optimistic side!
--
Posted: 2010-09-17 17:08:46
Edit :
Quote
On 2010-09-17 17:08:46, HxH wrote:
Maybe it about time and software optimization, just my optimistic side!
i really hope so.. as I really want to try this phone out, but if the camera isn't
MUCH better than my C905, its just not worth it right now for the price they are asking.
Low light shots from the N86 were amazing.. so I am surprise that these are so dark being that the sensor is so much bigger.
--
Posted: 2010-09-17 18:20:24
Edit :
Quote
Yeah I am thinking about getting the Nokia N8... was a long time since I had a Nokia phone.
--
Posted: 2010-09-17 19:12:05
Edit :
Quote
Max_wedge said the satio is way better than the C905, and i can tell you the N8 is way better than the satio... More details in shots.. But wait and see.
--
Posted: 2010-09-17 22:08:39
Edit :
Quote
On 2010-09-17 22:08:39, norbi_nw wrote:
Max_wedge said the satio is way better than the C905, and i can tell you the N8 is way better than the satio... More details in shots.. But wait and see.
who is Max_wedge?
Satio way better than C905?.. that is the first time I have heard this..
In fact, i have always heard the opposite.. C905 with Witchking CBE driver blows away Satio Is what I have been hearing..
--
Posted: 2010-09-17 22:26:06
Edit :
Quote
On 2010-09-17 15:56:28, jake20 wrote:
i am really disappointed in these low light shots from N8.. i hoped for much better
You don't like the dark photos? Read the explanation given by the guy at Flickr who shot the photos:
This is darker than the original because I manually set the ISO which resulted in underexposure as I had reached the slowest shutter speed. This was taken hand held at night. I liked the end result hence why I am sharing it. But technically correct is not always best or according to personal preferences
Higher ISO will definitely result in more noise and loss of detail. The EXIF data shows the first photo to be shot with ISO 100 with shutter speed 1/17s. Disappointing if the N8 doesn't allow slower shutter speeds than this
Looks like it's not time yet to throw away my three year old
i-mobile 902 with its 4 second low light shutter (10 seconds with EV +2.0!)...
[ This Message was edited by: AbuBasim on 2010-09-18 07:22 ]
--
Posted: 2010-09-18 08:17:48
Edit :
Quote
There's a problem with the N8 if it doesn't allow advanced camera settings to be set, such as shutter speed and ISO.
--
Posted: 2010-09-18 10:06:52
Edit :
Quote
@ Tsepz_GP - yes they do, but my desktop pc is slow and will not play Youtube videos in HD and like jake20 said they also compress them.
@ jake20 - that panoramic function is an app, so it wont come with it out of the box. Unfortunately. I wouldnt worry about a small delay, if the phone was meant to be released on 30th September, that site suggests only a weeks delay which isnt much considering how long some people have waited for this phone. Oh and i like those low light shots, they're better than what i get currently with any cameraphone. Heres hoping.
--
Posted: 2010-09-18 14:00:03
Edit :
Quote
i was waiting to be absolutely blown away by the still shots of the N8, and honestly right now with the exception of one photo.. i am not that impressed.
I honestly do not think these still shots are
much better than what my C905 can do.
Maybe my expectations are too high?
[ This Message was edited by: jake20 on 2010-09-18 16:19 ]
--
Posted: 2010-09-18 17:17:24
Edit :
Quote
New Topic
Reply
