>
New Topic
>
Topic Locked
Esato Forum Index
>
General discussions >
Rumours
> Sony Xperia Rumours 2016
Bookmark topic
On 2016-01-04 14:22:23, Jamzy wrote:
I just hope sony gets their front and back cameras nailed this time...
I really dont think they should've jumped to 23/25MP but instead made a larger sensor that performs better in low light
+1. Full manual mode would also be appreciated.
--
Posted: 2016-01-04 14:53:13
Edit :
Quote
any news about android M update?
--
Posted: 2016-01-04 14:53:45
Edit :
Quote
On 2016-01-04 14:22:23, Jamzy wrote:
I really dont think they should've jumped to 23/25MP but instead made a larger sensor that performs better in low light
IMX300 is a pretty big sensor, the one in new Nexuses is exactly the same size and they perform great in low light even without OIS.
--
Posted: 2016-01-04 18:10:17
Edit :
Quote
i wonder what sony will do about camera they use the same sensor z1 to z4 i doubt they will change the sensor , but if rumors are true about lg and samsung they will use 1/2 and 1/1.7 inch sensors.they can obliterate sony with ois,better software ,wider aperture and a lot bigger sensor pixels...
future is 8k maybe they use 1.0 um pixels and 33 mpx sensor to record 8k video but sd820 hasnt 8k support so it's impossible for now i guess maybe @2017...
--
Posted: 2016-01-04 18:50:56
Edit :
Quote
On 2016-01-04 14:53:13, ascariss wrote:
On 2016-01-04 14:22:23, Jamzy wrote:
I just hope sony gets their front and back cameras nailed this time...
I really dont think they should've jumped to 23/25MP but instead made a larger sensor that performs better in low light
+1. Full manual mode would also be appreciated.
The Nexus sensor has a larger pixel size from what i understand.
And on another note Samsung are said to be fabricating their own customer 1/2" sensor at 12MP which should in theory do even better in low light. Providing rumours are true.
--
Posted: 2016-01-04 19:05:39
Edit :
Quote
^
If the recent leaked specs (by evleaks) of the S7(edge) are true then Sony has to deliver an outstanding and designed from the scratch Z6 to compete with Samsung. I really hope for Sony they don't make the mistake to present an "updated" Z5 as Z6.
--
Posted: 2016-01-04 22:59:09
Edit :
Quote
@Ricky D,
Please update main post ... it's now 2016 - time to get on that coffee to wakeup from partying!
--
Posted: 2016-01-05 02:16:40
Edit :
Quote
I want to start a new rating system that is more representative of the rumour and the source. The object being to remove the subjectiveness of the XR system.
Tell me what you guys think.
Esato Rating (ER#)
Rating = Source Reliability + Rumour Credibility
Source Reliability
+0 - The source has never leaked info or has only ever leaked false info
+1 - The source has a patchy record of leaks, some hits but mostly misses
+2 - The sources has mostly correct info but sometimes get it wrong
+3 - The source is never wrong. The metaphorical horses mouth.
Rumour Credibility
+0 - Is absolutely ridiculous eg. "Sony to release a handset for felines with large paw shaped buttons and a loose thread of wool in the lanyard loop.
+1 - Is plausible but unlikely or the rumour has been floating for a looong time but never come yet eg. The true Ultra successor
+2 - Is probable and/or likely and generally believed to be existence. This could be leaks from different sources on different sites stating roughly the same info.
The total score would still be out of 5, but has more clarity and definition.
--
Posted: 2016-01-05 08:10:11
Edit :
Quote
But a ER1 could be either plausible or patchy. What about modeling it on the IP format. e.g ER12 = Patchy but Probable ER32 = Reliable and Plausible.
--
Posted: 2016-01-05 08:42:22
Edit :
Quote
ER1 could be a plausible idea from a pathological liar or patchy source, silly idea.
--
Posted: 2016-01-05 09:34:26
Edit :
Quote
New Topic
Topic Locked
