>
New Topic
>
Reply<
Esato Forum Index
>
Sony Ericsson / Sony >
General
> Why you chosen SE?
Bookmark topic
I really LIKED the design of the K700i
What just really made me SELL that fone is it's very poor battery life, upgrade or not, I guess the problem will still REMAIN
I guess it MUST be included as one of the candidates in the Best Celfone for 2004 Awards Night in Cancun !
--
Posted: 2004-11-18 01:21:09
Edit :
Quote
Both former posts are angry cos of the batt. It shows, that se forget to focus on the really important and standard fact, so instead of developing batt draining features like multi media, this problem should be solved first imo. Lets merge se with duracell, maybe that would help.
This message was posted from a T68i
--
Posted: 2004-11-18 01:29:19
Edit :
Quote
@bobafett - I guess
merging with ENERGIZER is much better mate! For more experience, a tie-up with Die Hard, Motolite and Oriental batteries would BEST solve the short-life battery performance issue of
here . . .
--
Posted: 2004-11-18 01:36:22
Edit :
Quote
Looks like people hv many different taste some like it some dont... cant blame on design tho... the only thing to blame is the batt life... coz both parties complain baut the batt life... juz hope SE make a new batt for K700 probably that is wat they are gonna do.. its all the the marketing strategy... that is wat they did wth MS DUO... now they hv a 256MB MS DUO.. so people wont complain baut low memory for K700/S700/P800..
Fullscreen videos.. cant blame much tho.. coz even NOkia phones all uses small screen for TAKING picture/video and viewing them... SE is gs enough providing bigger screen to take/view pics/videos....
--
Posted: 2004-11-18 08:11:10
Edit :
Quote
true, as of now, nokia has a bit of an edge over se, like the camera, screen and other what not features but i think what got me into se is that they have solid designs and connectivity. they, se, i think, have a longer age before getting obsolete plus their accssesories more than make up for some of the design flaws (like the mca-series of cameras and hpr-series of radioes). and also the one that attracted me most to se phones is their uniqueness without looking like a cheapskate or a gadget dork in this nokia filled world. i felt like sheep when i had a nokia 7650 because after a while a lot of people had it but when i chnaged to the t68i, ahh! uniqueness!
--
Posted: 2004-11-18 08:22:00
Edit :
Quote
Have something which everyone around you owns? Get real.........Look for practical features, performance and quality at value for money......I guess the answer for most users will be SE......just like me.
No other manufacturer has given better value for money compared to SE, not at least in my opinion.
Currently though SE seems to be getting carried away by competition and not concentrating on practical features, but hopefully they will move ahead.
Three cheers for SE and its users..........
--
Posted: 2004-11-18 08:58:25
Edit :
Quote
It is for SURE SE represents quality phones... the prices are even higher then NOkia latest phones... and it is a SONY product.. u know u hv great design n quality.... I hope to see more of SONY design in SE eg. S700..
--
Posted: 2004-11-18 12:20:32
Edit :
Quote
I went for Ericsson at the time because they stood for different design and technologically ahead.
Nokia was already the main brand then, wanted something different but of a brand one could trust.
A2628s was the best price/feature phone at the time I bought one. Stayed with the brand because original motive still valid and for a lot of reasons any marketeer can explain.
--
Posted: 2004-11-18 12:36:22
Edit :
Quote
My S700 SE has blow out Nokia phones water..Nokia releases lots of cphones but I dont think that all of them is beyond S700...Maybe It will be more fair to compare Nokia s 6630 (1.3mpx-3g) but others of course nope...So for me SE is the one for investing...Nokia s not bad of course it provides well-balanced tools.But it s not enough for me buying Nokia.I think they (NK) play with people really good.And this s their manners in market.Lots of lol phones with same specs with a little bit cheap and a little poor built ups...Anyway SE s the one for me.The worst thing for SE is not to select symbian OS.This sometimes force me...
--
Posted: 2004-11-18 12:42:28
Edit :
Quote
I AGREE that
's DESIGN surely outshines that of Nokia's, as the latter's shells are quite becoming TOO MONOTONOUS, specially with it's latest releases . . .
--
Posted: 2004-11-18 12:57:00
Edit :
Quote
New Topic
Reply
