>
New Topic
>
Topic Locked
Esato Forum Index
>
General discussions >
Rumours
> Huge Sony Ericsson Portfolio for 2007
Bookmark topic
@PeterKay
Yeah, SE should do background checks on all their employees.
@boba
The K650 seems to be the K610 successor:
Quote:
Could be named K650? Next low end Cybershot. 2 megapixel camera with auto-focus, two LEDs for flash. Same specs as K800 with different camera, but may only have a 176x220 screen. Competitor to the 6233. Does not have 3G, although there could be two variants (i.e. K790/K800) and there is mixed information.
--
Posted: 2006-12-14 13:24:01
Edit :
Quote
Sack all staff with Nokia phones, come on
we shouldn't be telling you this. This should be rule No.1
Hope we get some more pics!
staff we love you really
--
Posted: 2006-12-14 13:26:07
Edit :
Quote
Quote:
On 2006-12-14 13:24:01, shaliron wrote:
@boba
The K650 seems to be the K610 successor:
Quote:
Could be named K650? Next low end Cybershot. 2 megapixel camera with auto-focus, two LEDs for flash. Same specs as K800 with different camera, but may only have a 176x220 screen. Competitor to the 6233. Does not have 3G, although there could be two variants (i.e. K790/K800) and there is mixed information.
I wouldn't put these two in the same bracket. The K610i was a slim business class 3G phone. Good cam specs weren't a priority. Whereas the K650 is imaging based and 2.5G. Though I do think there will be a K610i replacement.
Where did the K620i rumours come from?
_________________
I
my W900i
[ This Message was edited by: goldenface on 2006-12-14 12:36 ]
--
Posted: 2006-12-14 13:34:47
Edit :
Quote
i saw somewhere a pic of a blue fone, imo the successor of k610, but i cannot find it...
--
Posted: 2006-12-14 13:38:06
Edit :
Quote
@goldenface
I never found the exact place from where they began, which leads me to believe that the K620 was not a real phone. Well at least not the one in which that they've described, which was almost an exact replica of the K800 with a tad more memory.
The K620 may exist, but maybe just not with those specs (which are probably made up IMO).
If the Li is not going to be called the K650, what would it be called? Not K550, because that would confuse the Na which is the
version, and that would have to be called the W650, making the Li the K650. Very confusing
But a new thought. Maybe the Li is the K770, and the Na is the W770 that we've been hearing about. Now that I think of it, it actually works.
--
Posted: 2006-12-14 13:45:20
Edit :
Quote
Quote:
On 2006-12-14 13:45:20, shaliron wrote:
But a new thought.
Maybe the Li is the K770, and the Na is the W770 that we've been hearing about. Now that I think of it, it actually works.
I agree. Its's more plausible as
don't have any K / V6XX's that aren't 3G.
K600i, V600i, K610, V630i... So that blue K620i pic was just a random photoshop it would seem.
_________________
I
my W900i
[ This Message was edited by: goldenface on 2006-12-14 12:54 ]
--
Posted: 2006-12-14 13:53:54
Edit :
Quote
@boba
Yeah, that blue K620 was just a photoshop of the K610. Nothing much at all.
EDIT: And that would make the generic version of the Ai (the phone known originally as the K770) the K650? Seems much more logical, and that would make the generic Ai, the successor of the K610. All solved.
_________________
A wooden spoon is a spoon made from wood.
Source: Wikipedia
SE's Upcoming Phones[ This Message was edited by: shaliron on 2006-12-14 13:09 ]
--
Posted: 2006-12-14 13:58:50
Edit :
Quote
I was fooling around with the pics in photoshop and then i tried to measure the Ai's screen.. I marked it using a tool and copied it. U know what the dimensions were? 242 x 179 pixels. If u size it up, it's like QVGA - 320 x 237 pixels!
i might have measured a few pixels off, but i think u can see what i mean
[ This Message was edited by: thecoolsha on 2006-12-14 13:23 ]
--
Posted: 2006-12-14 14:21:17
Edit :
Quote
@thecoolsha
Very right indeed. When I did it earlier, I must have been doing something wrong.
Well, it did look like a QVGA anyway. The icons down the bottom look very tiny, and a 176x220 screen would never have rendered them well.
Looks like my original source was right.
--
Posted: 2006-12-14 14:26:56
Edit :
Quote
Quote:
On 2006-12-14 14:26:56, shaliron wrote:
@thecoolsha
Very right indeed. When I did it earlier, I must have been doing something wrong.
Well, it did look like a QVGA anyway. The icons down the bottom look very tiny, and a 176x220 screen would never have rendered them well.
Looks like my original source was right.
Yes, i think so too...
Hmm check this out. Is this the off/on-button on Ai? Its very small, dont you think?
--
Posted: 2006-12-14 14:32:06
Edit :
Quote
New Topic
Topic Locked
