>
New Topic
>
Topic Locked
Esato Forum Index
>
General discussions >
Rumours
> SONY XPERIA Rumors 2014
Bookmark topic
@XperiaJunkie I agree with @JohnnyNr.5 ( well, except the "go to hell" part
)
As a high-end, it's either a S810 or to delay it, which is my option if 810 isn't ready... no 805 or 808...
--
Posted: 2014-12-06 09:14:25
Edit :
Quote
^+1.
I would rather they take the time until Qualcomm fix it. Little more time to polish the Z4. Release it only when it's ready.
[ This Message was edited by: on 2014-12-06 11:01 ]
--
Posted: 2014-12-06 12:00:10
Edit :
Quote
Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 Clock Frequencies Revealed
While the performance-packing Cortex A57 cores will be clocked close to 2 GHz, the energy-efficient Cortex A53 cores will have a lower 1.6 GHz clock frequency. The clock frequencies are a little disappointing considering that the Snapdragon 801 manages up to 2.5 GHz, and the new Snapdragon 805 has its cores clocked at 2.7 GHz.
http://www.nextpowerup.com/ne[....]lock-frequencies-revealed.html
--
Posted: 2014-12-06 15:11:42
Edit :
Quote
Clock frequencies have shit-all to do with performance in this case. Otherwise Apple's Cyclone cores clocked at like...1.5GHz wouldn't be leading the CPU benchmarks. If the cores are physically larger, then a lower clock speed shouldn't matter for performance, and should be better for heat management.
--
Posted: 2014-12-06 16:22:40
Edit :
Quote
It looks like they are having a lot of troubles with SD810, and i feel it will never be as good as they probably thought it's gonna be. Something is wrong with it and looks like they can't find the solution to fix it.
--
Posted: 2014-12-06 18:01:16
Edit :
Quote
http://www.ibtimes.co.in/sony[....]810-faces-heating-issue-616366
Snap 805?
--
Posted: 2014-12-06 18:23:09
Edit :
Quote
On 2014-12-06 16:22:40, -XYZ wrote:
Clock frequencies have shit-all to do with performance in this case. Otherwise Apple's Cyclone cores clocked at like...1.5GHz wouldn't be leading the CPU benchmarks. If the cores are physically larger, then a lower clock speed shouldn't matter for performance, and should be better for heat management.
It's these tech sites sometimes, some of the guys have not a clue what they are talking about, when I hear that the clocks are lower I immedietly feel happier as it means they have managed to get more power out of lower clocks, it can only be a good thing in terms of efficiency, and if I am not mistaken, with big.LITTLE the low power cores can now can work with the high power cores depending on the power needed, they configure themselves to match the power requirement, meaning they will manage tasks far more efficiently than previous SoCs, someone please correct me if I am wrong, but that is what I understand of this.
It will be sad if the Snapdragon 810 does not make it to early 2015 phones, it will make early 2015 boring for most, for me personally I will be fine as I already have a Snapdragon 805 phone, I plan on getting the Note 5 which should definitely have the 810 OR it will have the successor of the Exynos 7.
The Qualcomm problems for me are an explanation of why Samsung continue to develop Exynos and why LG are also developing their own chip, they do not want to fall behind due to a supplier who is having issues.
--
Posted: 2014-12-06 18:25:37
Edit :
Quote
Read again, at first they say it might get delayed duo to SD810 problems... But at the end they listed the spec. according to PA craps.
--
Posted: 2014-12-06 19:43:00
Edit :
Quote
very good processor
http://www.mediatek.com/en/pr[....]unications/smartphone1/mt6795/
--
Posted: 2014-12-07 12:56:10
Edit :
Quote
That SoC is nice, but it's not high-end.. the cores are not A57...
The only thing that is very good with it is the ( 480fps 1080p Full HD Super-Slow Motion video recording and playback ), I hope Qualcomm will add such ability to their S810...
--
Posted: 2014-12-07 14:05:06
Edit :
Quote
New Topic
Topic Locked
