Esato Mobile
Sony Ericsson / Sony : Software, Firmware and Drivers : Hybrid Camera Driver for W800i/K750 part 2
> New Topic
> Reply
< Esato Forum Index > Sony Ericsson / Sony > Software, Firmware and Drivers > Hybrid Camera Driver for W800i/K750 part 2 Bookmark topic
Page <  123 ... 636465 ... 919293>

BLKSNAKER Posts: 149

@dennis.l
@sarmadgilani

The pics arent taken with MXE-60...they are taken with a w810 r4ea31. When the light is not excelent...I just turn night mode on...the pics get noiseless...and perfectly sharp. Activate night mode always you think the light isnt the best...and youll get excelent pictures.

And to sarmadgilani...a biggerfile size doesnt improve the quality becasue the file size saves space supresing noise and other artifacts....with 9.0 camdriver I have taken pictures of 570kb...but this only happens when the details shouldnt be supressed by the driver.

@rockygali

same version.

@gxg

If you had seen the first post of the driver...you wouldnt be posting this. I clearly explain how I tunned a lot of drivers to get 9.0...the only credits I deserve are the ones for the hundreds of tests...tweaks...tests...tweaks..., but as I said, it is mainly based on 6.9 camdriver.......and I thanked it on my first post of the driver...sorry if I didnt do it in the text of the driver itself...that never crossed my mind, not because I am not a thankful person,the matter is that I dont think those things are the point, to try to develop or improve a good driver was my point...and I did it...getting what my exhaustive tests revealed me...9.0 camdriver is excelent. Hope dont misunderstood me.
--
Posted: 2007-03-09 19:16:09
Edit : Quote

biasiman Posts: 80

Do you think that adding the zuza trick for filesize would diminish the quality?
--
Posted: 2007-03-09 20:02:53
Edit : Quote

BLKSNAKER Posts: 149


On 2007-03-09 20:02:53, biasiman wrote:
Do you think that adding the zuza trick for filesize would diminish the quality?


No, I dont think so...but it already has the zuza trick added.
--
Posted: 2007-03-09 21:02:51
Edit : Quote

guguly Posts: 120

@BLKSNAKER

I've tried your 9.0 on my w810 running R4E and it's great specially the improved nightmode.

But Is it possible for you to include an enhanced nightmode (like Chengrong 8.53) in your driver? Your driver gives a very good dayshot and an improved nightmode as default. An option for a much better nightmode (as an option) would be a cool addition.

Thanks!!
--
Posted: 2007-03-10 00:17:30
Edit : Quote

mr.v Posts: 18

hi!

i have a CID49 K750 flashed to W800 R1BC002.

Can somebody upload the zuza CID49 drivers for me on rapidshare??
--
Posted: 2007-03-10 22:08:05
Edit : Quote

Magicnet2 Posts: 59


On 2007-03-10 22:08:05, mr.v wrote:
hi!

i have a CID49 K750 flashed to W800 R1BC002.

Can somebody upload the zuza CID49 drivers for me on rapidshare??

As a matter of fact, I have the same configuration as you do
I'm not sure if there is any difference in the ZUZA for 36 and for 49, but here you are ZUZA 2 and ZUZA 3.

http://rapidshare.com/files/20419911/camera_driver_v.ZUZA2.rar
http://rapidshare.com/files/20419986/camera_driver_v.ZUZA3.rar
http://rapidshare.com/files/2[....]53_camera_driver_for_CID49.rar

Personally I like the super 8.53. The enhanced night mode is amazing and macro photos with nightmode on are brilliant. Try that one as well.

//EDIT

I'm gonna try the 9.0 camdriver in night scenes and will give you notice.

[ This Message was edited by: Magicnet2 on 2007-03-10 23:59 ]
--
Posted: 2007-03-11 00:57:36
Edit : Quote

whatsucka Posts: > 500

so wats new with this Camdriver 9.0??
does it work with w800?? currently using version 8.53
can someone list a features list n how to use 9.0??
--
Posted: 2007-03-11 01:59:19
Edit : Quote

sharkcra Posts: 1

@BLKSNAKER

Hi BLKSNARKE and all the rest....

Driver 9.0 seems like it's a great driver.......
(i never liked ZUZA drivers... sorry GxG...always a fan of 7.7)).

I have 2 K750's, one is CID 36 and the other is CID 49 and both of the with R1CA021 firmware ....

In all the tests i 've made with different drivers since the appearence of ZUZA on both phones, i noticed that on a k750 CID36 with R1C021 the use of the ZUZA compresion trick (and so the ZUZA driver itself) is giving bad results on this particular phone , while drivers using a more standard compresion (and not this trick) have better results on a CID36...
I'm sure that this is not only MY imprerssion and it has already been reported by other users when they tested the same driver with different "flavors" (standard "flavour" AND Zuza "flavour"...)
....not to be unfair to the developer of ZUZA :
ZUZA works nice but only on K750 CID 49 or W800....

So, BLKSNARKE can you please make a version of your driver without this Zuza trick, or at least tell me which lines i need to change in order to remove it????
(i don't have problems with a bigger jpg file size.. and so others..!!!)

Thanks


[ This Message was edited by: sharkcra on 2007-03-11 04:14 ]
--
Posted: 2007-03-11 04:53:50
Edit : Quote

mr.v Posts: 18

hi!

thanx magicnet2 for the drivers.

but i have a question. is it true that the first batch of k750s (CID36) had better camera than CID49s??

my experience says so. i have a CID49 and my friend has a CID36. we often compare our images for the same lighting conditions, WB, EV,etc...

look at his CID36 pic...



and my CID49 pic...



his picture gives way 2 real colours than mine. note that my pic has a yellowish tint. how to correct that??
--
Posted: 2007-03-11 07:31:30
Edit : Quote

Magicnet2 Posts: 59

@mr.v

No probs with those drivers.
Well, I really cannot say, if this difference in quality of the pictures between 36 and 49 is allaround present, as I have only my CID49 R1BC002. But you really can see a strong difference on those two posted pictures. Yours is yellowish and a bit overexposed, its too bright. Maybe try press left for -0.3 or -0.7. At least the brightness will be better. When it still was a a k750 I was quite satisfied with my pictures. Now I have flashed it to w800 and use the 8.53 and its working PERFECTLY. Try it, maybe will be better.

@ALL
Actually now I'm comparing the 9.0 and 8.53. The 9.0 is good nice colours, but I think its sometimes a little bit blurry on the edges of the picture, whereas the 8.53 suits me best for now. It makes good sharp pictures and makes impressinve night scenes.

Scene taken with 8.53:


Same scene taken with the 9.0:


I'm waiting for oppinions...

[ This Message was edited by: Magicnet2 on 2007-03-11 13:29 ]
--
Posted: 2007-03-11 13:20:47
Edit : Quote
Page <  123 ... 636465 ... 919293>

New Topic   Reply
Forum Index

Esato home