Sony Ericsson / Sony : Software, Firmware and Drivers : Hybrid Camera Driver for W800i/K750 part 2
>
New Topic
>
Reply<
Esato Forum Index
>
Sony Ericsson / Sony >
Software, Firmware and Drivers
> Hybrid Camera Driver for W800i/K750 part 2
Bookmark topic
And one more thing. Find out what kinda FW does he have and what do you have. Cause FW can have influence on the picture quality aswell. I wouldn't be surprised if he had a newer or a well known as "better" FW than you have.
--
Posted: 2007-03-11 14:55:10
Edit :
Quote
can someone list the features n how to use camdriver 9.0??
what did it improve from 8.53??
--
Posted: 2007-03-11 19:27:30
Edit :
Quote
On 2007-03-11 07:31:30, mr.v wrote:
hi!
thanx magicnet2 for the drivers.
but i have a question. is it true that the first batch of k750s (CID36) had better camera than CID49s??
my experience says so. i have a CID49 and my friend has a CID36. we often compare our images for the same lighting conditions, WB, EV,etc...
look at his CID36 pic...
and my CID49 pic...
his picture gives way 2 real colours than mine. note that my pic has a yellowish tint. how to correct that??
try using the new zuza49 by gxg as i know he modded that driver for cid49 phones
--
Posted: 2007-03-11 22:05:24
Edit :
Quote
These are 3 subversions of 8.8 version SUPER CAMERA DRIVER...
Each version is based on yours, like you said, favorite drivers...but..with SUPER MODE functions, which i won`t explain, because i belive that`s all clear...
Only i must wrote is that in 1.0 scene, you have default settings of based driver which is implemented...
And these drivers are tested on k750i cid49, with w800 r1bc002 fw...worked fine, without unknown behaving... Probably worked on cid36 platforms...
Scences are:
1.0 Default (v9.0 or v7.7final or 7.7edited)
1.1 Enhanced mode
1.2 Document
1.3 Portrait
1.4 Beach/snow
1.5 Nightscene
1.6 Sports
1.7 Landscape
NOTE: Enhanced mode for night shots works in next way...
If you want to shot some photo in low light conditions, you just do it with 1.1 scene, but with 0.0 EV, it gives ISO100 value, but 2s of exposure...
But if you just change EV value to -0.3, exposure is 1s, but little higher ISO value, no lower picture quality...
On -0.7 EV value, exposure is 0.6s, and that`s is good and optimal way to make a enhanced photo without blur points...Ofcourse, that result of higher ISO value, but it`s no something drastic...
Links for download:
Super camera driver version v8.8(based on version v9.0 of BLKSnaker)
http://www.rogepost.com/n/9750779153 or
http://www.filefactory.com/file/74da43/
Super camera driver version v8.8(based on version v7.7final of andeo)
http://www.rogepost.com/n/8307388381 or
http://www.filefactory.com/file/e9c53c/
Super camera driver version v8.8(based on version v7.7fedited of neotracer)
http://www.rogepost.com/n/9062260738 or
http://www.filefactory.com/file/8ff828/
Enjoy...
Best regards
Mladen
[ This Message was edited by: mladen750i on 2007-03-12 13:08 ]
--
Posted: 2007-03-12 02:50:05
Edit :
Quote
how to use it and how can i see the difference? i wanted to improve my camera. thanks.
--
Posted: 2007-03-12 05:50:50
Edit :
Quote
On 2007-03-12 05:50:50, jkadg wrote:
how to use it and how can i see the difference? i wanted to improve my camera. thanks.
you have to install it on your phone and try to take shots, preferably of the same subject/s.The one that gives you the "best" picture is the one you should keep.
OR you could wait until someone else makes a review of the different versions with shots posted in this forum
--
Posted: 2007-03-12 06:22:24
Edit :
Quote
@BLKSNAKER:
Here's two sample shots to show you how the 9.0driver is working for me.. I have a w810 with R4EA031 and am getting lots of noise in my pictures.
This is indoor but with lots of light:
http://img169.imageshack.us/my.php?image=dsc00613an8.jpg
This is the same scene but with nightmode on, almost no difference at all:
http://img174.imageshack.us/img174/954/dsc00614fl7.jpg
Your pics are wayyyy better than this.. any idea what's going on?
--
Posted: 2007-03-12 15:22:06
Edit :
Quote
On 2007-03-11 14:55:10, Magicnet2 wrote:
And one more thing. Find out what kinda FW does he have and what do you have. Cause FW can have influence on the picture quality aswell. I wouldn't be surprised if he had a newer or a well known as "better" FW than you have.
we both have K750 fones flashed to W800 R1BC002, MAIN and FS. we used the same camera drivers, original k750 R1CA021 (5.3). we have tested on many drivers... his results are always better... but lemme try the CID49 zuza drivers...
note that in the images that iv posted, his camera clearly captured the purple lightin on the cieling but mine did not.
--
Posted: 2007-03-12 15:43:23
Edit :
Quote
Hello to all, a simple question creed for you: which to be the better one camdriver for cid 36 and cid 49 in firmware of k750 the R1CA021? I must modding 2 k750, one cid 36 and the other cid 49, thanks of the support.
--
Posted: 2007-03-12 17:09:13
Edit :
Quote
@sharkcra
I will post waht you asked tomorrow.
@whatsucka
the main difference is that 9.0 camdriver gets sharper pics than 8.53 in low light conditions, and colors and contrast are real. Besides this, 9.0 has smaller filesizes without loosing quality, and MXE-60 always on...controlling the power of the flash with the ev control (I dont know if this is normal in other drivers but 9.0 has this posibility)...but both drivers are great..I just prefer 9.0 becasue 8.53 gets a bigger amount of blurry night mode on pics.
@sarmadgilani
Really dont know why the pics you take look like that, I hope not be a low qualitiy camera sensor that produces tha "noised" pics.....tomorrow I am posting a new version of the driver implenting bigger filesizes...try that...or the 9.0 with super mode posted in the page before.
--
Posted: 2007-03-12 18:22:23
Edit :
Quote
New Topic
Reply
