Esato Mobile
Sony Ericsson / Sony : Software, Firmware and Drivers : Super camera driver for k750/w800/w810
> New Topic
> Reply
< Esato Forum Index > Sony Ericsson / Sony > Software, Firmware and Drivers > Super camera driver for k750/w800/w810 Bookmark topic
Page <  123 ... 642643644 ... 996997998>

heiyei Posts: 39

well just a thought...lpachoung's last driver A4A 7.9 should be called anger 4 all rather than all 4 all....
--
Posted: 2007-09-01 06:39:11
Edit : Quote

VegaR Posts: 16



[ This Message was edited by: VegaR on 2007-09-03 05:47 ]
--
Posted: 2007-09-01 08:30:05
Edit : Quote

JeganathanK Posts: 8


On 2007-08-30 11:19:24, lpachuong wrote:
Ok. This will be my last public release for A4A.
......
http://www.mediafire.com/?cewxl3djmlg

Read the guide to know how to change things/increase-decrease compression to reduce crash...

.......
_________________


@lpachuong
Thanks for your great work...
Take care of ur studies and ur helth....

One question:
In this 7.9 Version i'm not finding driver for CID36(W800i)..
But Guide.txt says there are 3 drivers in the rar file.
Can u upload it for us(W800i Users..)..?



--
Posted: 2007-09-01 08:35:13
Edit : Quote

Raiderski Posts: > 500

all K750/W800 owners
can you please make small test for me? i want to close compression topic once for ever in 6.5

1. download original sarmad 5.8 driver
2. upload to phone
3. find scene on which snapshot in (~100%) cases = camera crash
4. find scenes on which snapshot in (~50%) cases = camera crash
5. try 10-20 attempts to every scene (count good/crashed pictures)
6. replace in code only one thing: cam_ss_jpeg_buf_size_8=927C0; to 96650
7. upload to phone
8. repeat point 5 on scenes from point 3 and 4

report me results, opinions, etc.
thanks


_________________
W800 CID36 R1BD001
www.flickr.com/photos/8469432@N06/

[ This Message was edited by: Raiderski on 2007-09-01 09:16 ]
--
Posted: 2007-09-01 10:15:44
Edit : Quote

Tuner Posts: 20

Raiderski:
Well, I donīt think, that the difference between vf and taken picture is because of compression because vf with filtering on seems to be the same as taken picture. And picture on vf cannot be compressed. I tried to make a video with filtering off and sharp edges are visible everywhere! And 3gp compression is very high. So the true bill be somewhere else.
I think that filtering on or off must be visible much more on pictures.

--
Posted: 2007-09-01 10:57:11
Edit : Quote

EduX Posts: 92


On 2007-09-01 08:30:05, VegaR wrote:
Result of some camdriver test to shoot a poster in my bedroom, object distance 3.5 m from camera. The picture was crop in photoshop without changing quality.

My camera k750-w800 R1BC002 CID49, Camera setting: Fine mode, macro on, no flash light, focus infinity.

A4A_7.8


...
...
Sarmad 5.8


SUPER_Modmix by Strong 1.1


Maybe this result is not absolute, so I don’t compare and have no comment.

[ This Message was edited by: VegaR on 2007-09-01 07:32 ]


I don't know what are you talking abot. A4A sharpness is good

Distance 3.5 m, focus to infinity, all auto

Sarmad 5.8


Strong Mix 1.1


A4A 7.9


A4A 8.0 (compression like as in 7.9) - sharp, but more yellowish then 7.9


All pics are cropped from original without any change
My phone D750 modded to W800i R1BC002 CID36

[ This Message was edited by: EduX on 2007-09-01 10:15 ]
--
Posted: 2007-09-01 11:10:48
Edit : Quote

VegaR Posts: 16

My english is bad,
I will try A4A_8.0 to change A4A_7.8 in that post.
--
Posted: 2007-09-01 11:17:52
Edit : Quote

Raiderski Posts: > 500


On 2007-09-01 10:57:11, Tuner wrote:
Well, I donīt think, that the difference between vf and taken picture is because of compression because vf with filtering on seems to be the same as taken picture. And picture on vf cannot be compressed. I tried to make a video with filtering off and sharp edges are visible everywhere! And 3gp compression is very high. So the true bill be somewhere else.
I think that filtering on or off must be visible much more on pictures.


believe or not but it's compression filtering is working fine because i've posted proof (2 cropped images). answer for your observation is somewhere else, you must pay attention on resolutions:

- picture (1632x1224)
- video (176x144)

if you look into code of macro CORRECTION_SET you can find:

$z0 $c0 08 ...

it's

$get_current_image_buffer_size $if_size_is_1632x1224_then ...

as you can see i didn't disabled filtering (neither SPU which one discovered filtering register) for 640x480, 160x120 and video. the reason is simple...

640x480



on low resolutions unfiltered edges are totally distorted

--
Posted: 2007-09-01 11:28:28
Edit : Quote

salambaba Posts: 119

@raider

when your mod software bee rady to use ?
--
Posted: 2007-09-01 12:28:34
Edit : Quote

strong Posts: > 500

@Raiderski
No crash in my phone before and after change the bufer
shots in ful green
k750@w800 r1bc002

EDIT: I added in my supermodmix v1.2 beta the jpeg compress and quality(min max) in enchanced mode from sarmad 5.8 and bufer 96650 my phone works well
no crash after many shots green, night ,full light

EDIT2: why increase bufer size seems to get more quality?
I think must exisst safe border in this case.

@vegar
@edux
if you want to make fair tests get a tripode





[ This Message was edited by: strong on 2007-09-01 13:03 ]
--
Posted: 2007-09-01 12:45:59
Edit : Quote
Page <  123 ... 642643644 ... 996997998>

New Topic   Reply
Forum Index

Esato home