>
New Topic
>
Topic Locked
Esato Forum Index
>
General discussions >
Rumours
> SE-09-Portfolio
Bookmark topic
Don't think so, G900's screen is only .2 inch larger, so why not a 2.2" touchscreen?
btw, am I the only one who noticed that the codenames swapped?
[ This Message was edited by: domipost on 2009-10-21 19:50 ]
--
Posted: 2009-10-21 20:48:15
Edit :
Quote
No, G900's screen is 2.4 and you have to work with stylus. Now the stylus is outdated. So you can't have touchscreen for fingers in 2.2 inch screen.
--
Posted: 2009-10-21 20:58:41
Edit :
Quote
Ok, that's a good point, but I consider
stupid enough to do something like that now
--
Posted: 2009-10-21 21:03:04
Edit :
Quote
What I find interesting is that there is no menu button just a home button. Uh yeah explination?
--
Posted: 2009-10-21 21:18:56
Edit :
Quote
I've just realised something! Maybe I'm wrong, but the three items at the screen bottom have icons with them, plus the middle one seems to be selected. Doesn't this indicate that this phone is a touchscreen? And a non-touch interface would normally only have words at the bottom corresponding with the softkeys? Correct me if I'm wrong with my observation....
--
Posted: 2009-10-22 00:41:01
Edit :
Quote
Muhammad-Oli Posts: > 500
Quote:
On 2009-10-21 17:46:24, mediar wrote:
It's android, I think it will be G900's successor, but the phone is just ugly. Look like J132's successor.
Yes! Completely agree with this. When I saw it, I thought J132. It is just so plain and ugly looking.
Anyway I think it looks to be android, and doesn't the button with the house icon confirm that?
--
Posted: 2009-10-22 01:03:00
Edit :
Quote
I don't find it ugly at all and I think it runs A300. A UI designer at SE had recently commented about SE wanting a unified user experience in their handsets, no matter what OS is running. THat would explain the similarity between this and Rachael's UI.
--
Posted: 2009-10-22 02:56:12
Edit :
Quote
vulcan FCC tear down.
https://gullfoss2.fcc.gov/pro[....]t_id=1186505&native_or_pdf=pdf
https://gullfoss2.fcc.gov/pro[....]t_id=1186510&native_or_pdf=pdf
https://gullfoss2.fcc.gov/pro[....]t_id=1186509&native_or_pdf=pdf
--
Posted: 2009-10-22 04:17:33
Edit :
Quote
On 2009-10-21 18:32:52, xell wrote:
tranced: Maybe not.
On 2009-10-21 17:07:30, Pop Lover wrote:
I have feeling that the OS of this phone will be symbian...
Pro S60: No touchscreen, Home key
Con S60: No softkeys
Pro Android: Statusbar icons
Con Android: No touchscreen, no menu key
You decide. I think we're d'accord it's not Enea OSE.
Pro S60: Home Key (not normally used by majority of S60 devices: Only E71/E66/E52/E55/and E72 use that Home icon.
Con S60: ALWAYS has soft keys; always will. They're right there, just present when menu is needed.
NON-Pro Android: Those are A200 or UIQ like statusbar icons take a HARD look. Shame on you for not seeing this, and you call yourself an
fan ?
Android LONG abandoned multi-platforms: no qwerty candybar has been released using Android, nor leaked as of yet. It was a prototype from HTC specific to Google's internal testing but never seen light of day. Unsure why to be honest.
--
Posted: 2009-10-22 08:00:14
Edit :
Quote
i don't think sunny will be an android. it may be s60 or A300.
looks like 2" screen. my quetion is whats the need for it to be smart? rather concentrating w995 kind of mobiles to be smart..
[ This Message was edited by: idumbakumar on 2009-10-22 08:26 ]
--
Posted: 2009-10-22 09:25:24
Edit :
Quote
New Topic
Topic Locked
