News Forum Phone database

> New Topic
> Reply
< Esato Forum Index > Sony Ericsson / Sony > Windows Mobile > Sony Ericsson XPERIA X1 discussion Bookmark topic

I'm wondering about WM6 and battery life. Although I realize it's a samsung I had a Blackjack 2 for all of two days, and while the battery life was supposedly increased over the older blackjack model, with moderate use it required recharging daily. Checking emails a lot and surfing the web twice a day.
--
Posted: 2008-02-12 19:54:21
Edit : Quote




It'll probably work like a lot of other HTC devices with a light sensor on the front of the phone so if the ambient light is low, the keypad lights come on.

Battery life should be fine unless SE brand it with rubbish. I flash custom Windows Mobile images to Operator-branded devices all the time. The Orange version of the XDA Exec (SPV M5000) has pitiful battery life, but when flashed with a cooked ROM, the difference is unbelievable.

Most battery issues in Windows Mobile are down to what the operator installs either in the ROM or the extended ROM.
--
Posted: 2008-02-12 19:58:51
Edit : Quote


The best i've seen of battery life..for a smartphone with similar features is the HTC Touch Cruise with Talk time upto 7h and stand-by 450h..hopefully this beats it..

Usually SE are good on this front but again this is WM6 WM6 WM6...
--
Posted: 2008-02-12 20:03:50
Edit : Quote




you mean the panels? here are some, courtesy of Mizzle i don't think SE has shown more than this,
http://blog.se-nse.net/2008/02/12/a-look-at-xperia/

@all
please stop comparing the x1 with the iphone or the n95 it makes no sense since those are already in the market for months and the x1 will not hit the market until late this year. so we should be looking more at HTC new devices, n96, iphone2 , etc... those would be the real competitors.

Ppl let's not be blind about the X1, I understand the fuzz about it but we should try to provide more objective opinions.
As i have said before there are already a few devices in the market with similar or better specs than the x1, imagine what the market would be like by the end of this year and try to picture our x1 there would he have a chance?



[ This Message was edited by: tonchy on 2008-02-12 19:11 ]
--
Posted: 2008-02-12 20:10:10
Edit : Quote


that's what i was thinking but wasn't fo sure. thanks. only disappointing thing now is the wait.
--
Posted: 2008-02-12 20:11:02
Edit : Quote


My main problem with this phone is that SE are going to make the same mistake as all the other WM manufacturers trying to create a finger based UI. That is too much finger unfriendly WM UI is left in there.

SE needs to create its own interface for contacts, calender, media player, IE, messaging, file browser, Phone app, Programs folder and especially Settings menu.

The Settings menu in WM is the worst imo, having to tick 'beam' on and off etc. X1 should look nothing like WM except for msn messenger, ms office, the homescreen and being able to run wm apps. Thats it.

To be honest, I dont think they'll manage it.
--
Posted: 2008-02-12 20:59:15
Edit : Quote


It seems SE dont have any chance if true:

http://pdadb.net/index.php?m=specs&id=1117


according to this link X1 use Nexperia PNX4008 and this is exactly the same CPU that use in P1\W960\P990\M600\W950 and X1 with this cpu is only baby toy ...


--
Posted: 2008-02-12 21:51:09
Edit : Quote


our supplier says 12.000 sek, read somewhere 7.000 sek

anyone having a clue?
--
Posted: 2008-02-12 22:06:49
Edit : Quote




No pb, it's like for AMD or Intel processor, there is one family name (or more), and also different speed ! it's not because you have a Core 2 Duo that all have same frequency, so, it's not sufficient to say it's same speed...
--
Posted: 2008-02-12 22:35:19
Edit : Quote


You guys seen this?

Sony Ericsson Xperia X1
Release Date: May, 2008

http://pdadb.net/index.php?m=pdamaster&posted=1&os=p520c

--
Posted: 2008-02-12 23:20:53
Edit : Quote

---

New Topic   Reply

Forum Index