>
New Topic
>
Reply<
Esato Forum Index
>
Manufacturer Discussion >
Nokia
> Nokia 808 PureView Thread And Discussion
Bookmark topic
Still it's gonna be expensive for the average teenager..
Offtopic..I listened to Deadmau5,Richie Hawtin blahblahblah be4 I moved on Crookers and then I started to listen to Dubstep by accident..never regret it
And ocf I don't like Skrillex very much, mostly like South London Dubstep & East London Grime..
--
Posted: 2013-07-01 23:09:47
Edit :
Quote
^ EDM is the way to go
slimmer hump thanks to:
1. Slightly smaller sensor
2. Single capacitor for the xenon vs. 2 in the 808 (still more range on the 1020, newer tech)
3. Smaller xenon bulb (still better based on paper)
4. No loud speaker inside the camera hump
--
Posted: 2013-07-11 22:25:59
Edit :
Quote
Side by side the two greatest cameraphones history !
[ This Message was edited by: Sonysta on 2013-07-15 02:28 ]
--
Posted: 2013-07-11 22:50:01
Edit :
Quote
To celebrate the 1020, I pumped up the saturation to the max, and managed to get some good grain in the clouds..
Original
--
Posted: 2013-07-13 05:09:51
Edit :
Quote
10... Fantastic... Fantastic... Great Work Man !!!
P.S: Digital Camera Nokia 808 PureView (_____ABYSS_____) Digital Camera Nokia Lumia 1020 Pureview !!!
[ This Message was edited by: Sonysta on 2013-07-15 02:28 ]
--
Posted: 2013-07-13 08:06:17
Edit :
Quote
^ thank you!
--
Posted: 2013-07-13 14:22:00
Edit :
Quote
Side By Side Nokia 808 Pureview (Phase 1) Vs Nokia Lumia 1020 Pureview (Phase 3):
*
Optical Assembly: 808 (Zeiss Vario Tessar Wide Angle 26 mm) Vs 1020 (Zeiss Vario Tessar Wide Angle 25 mm)
*
Construction Lens: 808 (5 Elements, 1 Group. All Lens Surfaces Are Aspherical) Vs 1020 (System Of 6 Lenses, 5 Plastic Molded High Performance Plastic, One High Precision Glass Element)
*
F-Number: 808 (f/2.3984375) Vs 1020 (f/2.2)
*
Focus Range: 808 (15 Cm - Infinity) Vs 1020 (15 Cm - Infinity)
*
Iso Sensitivity: 808 (50 - 1600) Vs 1020 (100 - 4000)
*
Shutter Speed: 808 (Min: (2,7s) / Max: (1/2747s) Vs 1020 (Min: (4s) / Max: (1/16000s)
*
Flash: 808 (Xenon (3rd Generation) And Led (2rd Generation) Vs 1020 (Xenon (3rd Generation) And Led (2rd Generation)
*
Reach In Shooting Of Flash: 808 (Up To 4 Meters) Vs 1020 (Up To 3 Meters)
*
Sensor: 808 (CMOS FSI) Vs 1020 (CMOS BSI)
*
Format: 808 (1/1.2”) Vs 1020 (1/1.5")
*
Surface: 808 (10,67 x 8,00mm) Vs 1020 ( 9,00 X 7,00mm)
*
Image Stabilization: 808 (Digital) Vs 1020 (Optical Barrel Shift)
*
Mechanical Shutter: 808 (Yes) Vs 1020 (Yes)
*
Pixel Size: 808 (38 MP (1.4 Microns) / 8 MP (3.07 Microns) / 5 Megapixels (3.91 Microns) / 3 MP (4.89 Microns) Vs 1020 (38 MP (1.12 Microns) / 5 Megapixels (3.20 Microns)
*
Total Pixel Are Used: 808 (7728 x 5368 - 41.4 MP) Vs 1020 (7712 x 5360 - 41.3 MP)
*
Maximum Effective Resolution: 808 (7728 x 4354 For (16:9) / 7152 x 5368 For (4:3) Vs 1020 (7712 x 4352 For (16:9) / 7136 x 5360 For (4:3)
P.S: Who is Better ? To Me The 808 ! But For You ?
[ This Message was edited by: Sonysta on 2013-07-26 07:02 ]
--
Posted: 2013-07-15 03:31:38
Edit :
Quote
I updated the first post in the 1020 thread .. thanks for the info
So the flash is weaker now ? 3 meters vs 4 ?
--
Posted: 2013-07-15 05:08:28
Edit :
Quote
Yes so even !
I talked with some instructors Nokia here in Brazil and they showed me all the product details and confirmed that the power of the flash is even 3 meters !
This decision was taken in order to make the device thinner and lighter, but they say the image quality is not affected, because the backlit sensor and new processing algorithm, will make the scenes that makes use of the flash may be as well lit as those taken by 808 !
Just missing out who made the sensor 1020... Sony or Toshiba!
Once you know, post here !
[ This Message was edited by: Sonysta on 2013-07-15 05:16 ]
--
Posted: 2013-07-15 06:10:39
Edit :
Quote
Samsung Galaxy S4 Zoom vs Nokia 808 PureView Camera Comparison ->
http://www.fonearena.com/blog/74833/samsung-galaxy-s4-zoom-vs-nokia-808-pureview-camera-comparison.html
--
Posted: 2013-07-15 23:45:21
Edit :
Quote
New Topic
Reply
